There is no ice wall security and no ice wall (proof here)

People post their opinions on the internet, if you do not like these ideas and opinions, than I think you should leave.

By the way, having an IQ that is too high makes you fuctionally retarded, and is heavily recorded in Austism studies.  

I said it in the other popular thread but why not here too... I'm going to sleep, please dont slander too much

Quote from: "AdayTripper"

Wrong, it is a belief or attitude of placing a certain group higher than others, or any field.

Yes, it would seem that that falls nicely within my description of elitism (I don't know why you used the word "wrong" here, since it's pretty obvious that all examples of elitism are what I described them to be) -- as opposed to CrimsonKing's behavior, which in no way establishes a group that is seen as superior to any other.

Uhh, again are you blind? By him questioning if he was worthy enough, that would imply there is a group that is. Hence elitism.

Quote from: "AdayTripper"

Wrong, it is a belief or attitude of placing a certain group higher than others, or any field.

Yes, it would seem that that falls nicely within my description of elitism (I don't know why you used the word "wrong" here, since it's pretty obvious that all examples of elitism are what I described them to be) -- as opposed to CrimsonKing's behavior, which in no way establishes a group that is seen as superior to any other.

What the hell man???  :lol:  He said I was not worthy, ELITISM!!  :roll:

Uhh, again are you blind? By him questioning if he was worthy enough, that would imply there is a group that is. Hence elitism.

Not necessarily.  He could be asserting that no group is worthy to demand my thoughts of me -- a sentiment with which I wholly agree.

Quote from: "Funkbass796"

Uhh, again are you blind? By him questioning if he was worthy enough, that would imply there is a group that is. Hence elitism.

Not necessarily.  He could be asserting that no group is worthy to demand my thoughts of me -- a sentiment with which I wholly agree.

There would still be a group(however no one is in it, but it is still a group none the less) that woudl be able to demand answers of you.

There would still be a group(however no one is in it, but it is still a group none the less) that woudl be able to demand answers of you.

Incredible.  You must be a mathematician -- but wait, no.  A group cannot be empty: it must contain an identity element.

Quote from: "Funkbass796"

There would still be a group(however no one is in it, but it is still a group none the less) that woudl be able to demand answers of you.

Incredible.  You must be a mathematician -- but wait, no.  A group cannot be empty: it must contain an identity element.

Give further description of this ''identity element''

Give further description of this ''identity element''

A group is a set G, along with an operation * under which G is closed.  Every group contains a unique identity element e such that for every element x in G, e*x = x*e = x.

That is the defining property of a group's identity element... more description cannot be made unless a specific group is being discussed.

Well it's simple. The group is nothing but an idea right now. However it is still able to be entered or exiled from. but that's besides the point. He still implied the existence of a group of people that are able to demand your answers, which shows the elitism.

He still implied the existence of a group of people that are able to demand your answers, which shows the elitism.

This is a sufficiently ridiculous claim that I am terminating my participation in this line of discussion.

Quote from: "Funkbass796"

He still implied the existence of a group of people that are able to demand your answers, which shows the elitism.

This is a sufficiently ridiculous claim that I am terminating my participation in this line of discussion.

Translation :

I give up

Translation :

I give up

If you are happy with your utterly idiotic translation skills, then I am too.

Quote from: "TehErrthIsRownt"

Translation :

I give up

If you are happy with your utterly idiotic translation skills, then I am too.

I thought you gave up?

You strive to frustrate others who attempt to make an argument. You say clarity is required, yet you try your best to sidestep or avoid the issue. Say what you will, but slander it is not!

I have a great deal of patience myself, however I find you to be particularly troublesome. I came here to debate, but it seems there's very little of that. Whatever proof is provided to you, is immediately dismissed as conspiracy. Do you really think NASA faked those photos from the '60's? I do not, I live in the real world, the round one!

Any moderator with permissions please remove my account, I won't be needing it anymore. I'm going to try to find another board where scientific reasoning is used, not abused.

The whole point of the argument is seeing if you can prove without anyone telling you that the Earth is round. It is obvious you can: lunar eclipses, travel the world, climb a mountain, look at the ocean from a plane (if no clouds obscure your view).

OK. I disbelievd the whole icewall thing until I took a trip to Antarctica. I saw an icewall about 110 feet high. We followed it for 5 miles and it was still going off into the distance. We climbed it and it was 1 mile or so thick. We walked to the edge and there was a sheer drop on the other side of about 1/2 a mile down. I belive this is where the "edge of the world" theory came from.