The earth and moon are both approximately 6,000 years old. What was there before, we do not know, as RET does not know.
Read the FAQ and lurk more.
The earth and moon are both approximately 6,000 years old.
If you say that the earth is flat, you are destroying centuries of evolution.
Quote from: Kathleen Wilcox on September 17, 2009, 03:02:53 PMThe earth and moon are both approximately 6,000 years old. What was there before, we do not know, as RET does not know.Kathleen is right.
Better bring a better augment, something not so stupid.
Why should we?People already have...by digging into the deeper layers rock, examining the rock, and concluding the age, whether it is thousands, millions or billions of years old.
Quote from: Laser Mittens on September 17, 2009, 05:06:23 PMWhy should we?People already have...by digging into the deeper layers rock, examining the rock, and concluding the age, whether it is thousands, millions or billions of years old.Who did this digging, and what gives them the arrogance to think they can tell the age of a rock simply by "examining" it?
Oh, for God's sake... Look out your window.
http://i33.tinypic.com/350t5s8.jpgIs this supposed to prove something here?
Looks pretty flat to me.
Well actually yes, just agreeing with someone with no reason given or backup evidence displayed by either party, is just babble.
Moon ? Date of Birth: 16 September, 1908According to http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0713979/bio
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
Quote from: W on September 17, 2009, 04:33:31 PMQuote from: Kathleen Wilcox on September 17, 2009, 03:02:53 PMThe earth and moon are both approximately 6,000 years old. What was there before, we do not know, as RET does not know.Kathleen is right.Of course she is. Obviously the conspiracy is faking all of the geological evidence too.
Quote from: markjo on September 17, 2009, 07:17:31 PMQuote from: W on September 17, 2009, 04:33:31 PMQuote from: Kathleen Wilcox on September 17, 2009, 03:02:53 PMThe earth and moon are both approximately 6,000 years old. What was there before, we do not know, as RET does not know.Kathleen is right.Of course she is. Obviously the conspiracy is faking all of the geological evidence too.Sorry Mark, but I am not interested in radiometric dating. We do not know the initial abundance amounts of the elements found on earth. There is no scientific basis for this massive guess of the earth's age.
Radiometric dating--the process of determining the age of rocks from the decay of their radioactive elements--has been in widespread use for over half a century. There are over forty such techniques, each using a different radioactive element or a different way of measuring them. It has become increasingly clear that these radiometric dating techniques agree with each other and as a whole, present a coherent picture in which the Earth was created a very long time ago. Further evidence comes from the complete agreement between radiometric dates and other dating methods such as counting tree rings or glacier ice core layers. Many Christians have been led to distrust radiometric dating and are completely unaware of the great number of laboratory measurements that have shown these methods to be consistent. Many are also unaware that Bible-believing Christians are among those actively involved in radiometric dating.
Quote from: Kathleen Wilcox on September 17, 2009, 08:51:41 PMQuote from: markjo on September 17, 2009, 07:17:31 PMQuote from: W on September 17, 2009, 04:33:31 PMQuote from: Kathleen Wilcox on September 17, 2009, 03:02:53 PMThe earth and moon are both approximately 6,000 years old. What was there before, we do not know, as RET does not know.Kathleen is right.Of course she is. Obviously the conspiracy is faking all of the geological evidence too.Sorry Mark, but I am not interested in radiometric dating. We do not know the initial abundance amounts of the elements found on earth. There is no scientific basis for this massive guess of the earth's age.Quote from: http://www.asa3.org/ASA/RESOURCES/WIENS.htmlRadiometric dating--the process of determining the age of rocks from the decay of their radioactive elements--has been in widespread use for over half a century. There are over forty such techniques, each using a different radioactive element or a different way of measuring them. It has become increasingly clear that these radiometric dating techniques agree with each other and as a whole, present a coherent picture in which the Earth was created a very long time ago. Further evidence comes from the complete agreement between radiometric dates and other dating methods such as counting tree rings or glacier ice core layers. Many Christians have been led to distrust radiometric dating and are completely unaware of the great number of laboratory measurements that have shown these methods to be consistent. Many are also unaware that Bible-believing Christians are among those actively involved in radiometric dating.
Prove to me all these unstable nuclei originate from earth.
Sorry Mark, but I am not interested in radiometric dating. We do not know the initial abundance amounts of the elements found on earth. There is no scientific basis for this massive guess of the earth's age.
Quote from: Kathleen Wilcox on September 17, 2009, 08:51:41 PMSorry Mark, but I am not interested in radiometric dating. We do not know the initial abundance amounts of the elements found on earth. There is no scientific basis for this massive guess of the earth's age.Is there any scientific basis for your 'guess at the earth's age?
Quote from: Kathleen Wilcox on September 17, 2009, 09:29:44 PMProve to me all these unstable nuclei originate from earth. Where do igneous rocks come from?
Quote from: markjo on September 17, 2009, 09:42:03 PMQuote from: Kathleen Wilcox on September 17, 2009, 09:29:44 PMProve to me all these unstable nuclei originate from earth. Where do igneous rocks come from?Do you have any proof a specific element originated on earth or not?
No, but there is no scientific basis for RET's claim, so in the tie, I will trust my philosophical beliefs.