So, how does Apollo 13 fit into all this FE stuff?

Quote from: "troubadour"

Quote from: "cadmium_blimp"

I didn't say there was an anti-gravity machine.

Quote from: "cadmium_blimp"

I'm sure they have the money. If they wanted to they could do it. It all comes down to how paranoid you are. Will you believe something simply because it seems plausible?

Are you suggesting that nasa created some kind of anti-gravity machine to create videos of weightless astronauts to simulate space or not? It seems to me that you are. And that if one threw money at any problem or issue, one could solve it. Which is not the case in physics.

Did I say that I thought they created an anti-grav machine?

You don't have to say anything inheirtenly sexually harrasing to be charged and found guilty of sexual harrasment, you only have to suggest it. And I think that is the case here. You are suggesting it.

First you have to find someone stupid enough to actually use the nuke.

EDIT:  I guess we're going back to the serious part of the discussion.  I also presented an alternative.  That alternative was the illusion of the absence of gravity.

You don't just use nuclear arms to destroy one unit, that's just silly. That be like launching long range cruise missiles at jeeps and such.

Also the Gundam pictured, GP02A, can launch nuclear warheads from its cannon.

First you have to find someone stupid enough to actually use the nuke.

Tactical Nuclear Warheads aren't the big-booms you have seen in videos from test blasts. They create localized nuclear reactions that only take out smaller targets. They are precise enough to navigate through buildings and down hallways, even at high speeds.

Quote from: "cadmium_blimp"

First you have to find someone stupid enough to actually use the nuke.

Tactical Nuclear Warheads aren't the big-booms you have seen in videos from test blasts. They create localized nuclear reactions that only take out smaller targets. They are precise enough to navigate through buildings and down hallways, even at high speeds.

Just like Unreal Tournament right?!

You don't just use nuclear arms to destroy one unit, that's just silly. That be like launching long range cruise missiles at jeeps and such.

Also the Gundam pictured, GP02A, can launch nuclear warheads from its cannon.

Gundam was probably one of the crappiest animes I ever saw TBH. I never understood the allure.

Quote from: "troubadour"

Quote from: "cadmium_blimp"

First you have to find someone stupid enough to actually use the nuke.

Tactical Nuclear Warheads aren't the big-booms you have seen in videos from test blasts. They create localized nuclear reactions that only take out smaller targets. They are precise enough to navigate through buildings and down hallways, even at high speeds.

Just like Unreal Tournament right?!

You think unreal tournament invented the TV guided missle?

Quote from: "cadmium_blimp"

First you have to find someone stupid enough to actually use the nuke.

Tactical Nuclear Warheads aren't the big-booms you have seen in videos from test blasts. They create localized nuclear reactions that only take out smaller targets. They are precise enough to navigate through buildings and down hallways, even at high speeds.

The ramifications are more than just that.  Politics and all sorts of things come into play just with the mention of nukes, even if it is just a little one.

Quote from: "Desu"

You don't just use nuclear arms to destroy one unit, that's just silly. That be like launching long range cruise missiles at jeeps and such.

Also the Gundam pictured, GP02A, can launch nuclear warheads from its cannon.

Gundam was probably one of the crappiest animes I ever saw TBH.

Which one are you talking about? the original?

You think unreal tournament invented the TV guided missle?

no, but I do think you missed the joke

Quote from: "troubadour"

Quote from: "cadmium_blimp"

First you have to find someone stupid enough to actually use the nuke.

Tactical Nuclear Warheads aren't the big-booms you have seen in videos from test blasts. They create localized nuclear reactions that only take out smaller targets. They are precise enough to navigate through buildings and down hallways, even at high speeds.

The ramifications are more than just that.  Politics and all sorts of things come into play just with the mention of nukes, even if it is just a little one.

Politics and people (ignorant ones albeit) understand nukes as the monsters of yesteryear, this is true.

Quote from: "troubadour"

You think unreal tournament invented the TV guided missle?

no, but I do think you missed the joke

I've played the game, i get it.

Quote from: "Desu"

Quote from: "troubadour"

You think unreal tournament invented the TV guided missle?

no, but I do think you missed the joke

I've played the game, i get it.

Apparently you didn't since you actually thought he was serious.

Quote from: "Desu"

You don't just use nuclear arms to destroy one unit, that's just silly. That be like launching long range cruise missiles at jeeps and such.

Also the Gundam pictured, GP02A, can launch nuclear warheads from its cannon.

Gundam was probably one of the crappiest animes I ever saw TBH. I never understood the allure.

Eh I guess not everyone likes to see things blow up. I didn't like some of them either, though. Gundam Wing was pretty stupid and so was G-gundam. I liked the ones where it was a bit more 'realistic' and they tried to explain the purpose of 50 foot robots with pseudo-science and such.

ok, first off, nukes are more of a status symbol than a weapon anymore, it's like the scene in the crappy action movie where the big standoff happens and the crazy guy shows up with the trigger to the warehouse of gunpowder below them in his hand, only in this metaphor when that guys makes his entrance everyone flocks to get their own trigger made, it's not about who can blow up who, it's more of an international game of chicken.
     as far as apollo 13 and the space program in general, how do you explain the shuttle launches at cape canaveral? NASA spends millions if not billions to build these huge things and launch them up into the air all in the name if making the hoax look authentic?
     what about the shuttle that blew up on re-entry and debris was found all over north america? or that you can see the shuttles re-entering the earth's atmosphere if you know what nights to go and look on and live in the american southwest or elsewhere on the shuttle's re-entry path

What about the shuttle?  It goes up and it comes down.

ok, first off, nukes are more of a status symbol than a weapon anymore, it's like the scene in the crappy action movie where the big standoff happens and the crazy guy shows up with the trigger to the warehouse of gunpowder below them in his hand, only in this metaphor when that guys makes his entrance everyone flocks to get their own trigger made, it's not about who can blow up who, it's more of an international game of chicken.
     as far as apollo 13 and the space program in general, how do you explain the shuttle launches at cape canaveral? NASA spends millions if not billions to build these huge things and launch them up into the air all in the name if making the hoax look authentic?
     what about the shuttle that blew up on re-entry and debris was found all over north america? or that you can see the shuttles re-entering the earth's atmosphere if you know what nights to go and look on and live in the american southwest or elsewhere on the shuttle's re-entry path

The answer is easy, it's all a conspiracy, read the FAQ, all there answers are there. didn't you see them?



p.s. i didn't either.