About that "150 foot wall of ice"...

  • 96 Replies
  • 30428 Views
?

Skeptek

  • 207
  • +0/-0
  • White Hats for Whirled Peas
About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« on: June 12, 2009, 09:05:59 AM »
I'm sure you have "perfect" explanations for this, but here's some questions.  I'm really hoping that "conspiracy" isn't the only response.

Why hasn't anyone ever climbed over this little wall and viewed the edge?

Has anyone ever fallen off?  Who?  When?  Why not?  How do we know?

Wouldn't some debris (rocks, snow, ice, animals, etc.) inevitably fall off the edge and be caught in the "dark matter" so that we would see this debris "standing next to the Earth?"

Is there atmosphere past the edge?

Why hasn't anyone ever flown a space ship over the edge and "under" the Earth to document it's shape?

Why hasn't anyone ever built a tower taller than 150' near the edge to see over it and "out of the enclosure?"

Even without the "false data" we get from GPS and other modern navigational tools, it IS possible to fly over the South Pole to the opposite side of the Earth, and that distance is SHORTER than a route taken laterally.  How can this be?

I tried to read the FAQ, but this stuff gets so tiresome to read with the long explanations...
When do we all drink the Kool-Aid?
Enjoy my posts?  Learn more here:
Not just another Flat Earth website... All are welcome.

(Thanks, Daniel.

*

3 Tesla

  • 808
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth double agent
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2009, 09:30:49 AM »
Why hasn't anyone ever climbed over this little wall and viewed the edge?

Little?

I think that the mountains have to be about 200m km tall in order to stop the atmo-plane from diffusing away into space over the edges of The Earth.
"E pur si muove" ("And yet it moves"); Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

?

Skeptek

  • 207
  • +0/-0
  • White Hats for Whirled Peas
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2009, 11:13:32 AM »
Oh, right!  I forgot about the "change the theory to match the current discussion" rule.  Oops.

But... at the risk of bringing wrath... wouldn't a 200km high wall of ice be... I dunno... NOTICED?

Ok, ok.  Is "Nobody has bothered to go check it out." the only argument to this one?  Come on, ya'all.  You can do better than just increasing the height, can't you?

How about... never mind.
When do we all drink the Kool-Aid?
Enjoy my posts?  Learn more here:
Not just another Flat Earth website... All are welcome.

(Thanks, Daniel.

*

Johannes

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 2734
  • +0/-0
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #3 on: June 12, 2009, 04:25:58 PM »
Have you ever climbed a 150 wall in sub-zero conditions while being sniped?

?

Brock1563

  • 8
  • +0/-0
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #4 on: June 12, 2009, 05:45:03 PM »
Have you ever climbed a 150 wall in sub-zero conditions while being sniped?
What evidence do you have of there being snipers at this "ice wall?"

*

3 Tesla

  • 808
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth double agent
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2009, 03:26:04 AM »
Have you ever climbed a 150 wall in sub-zero conditions while being sniped?
What evidence do you have of there being snipers at this "ice wall?"

Because nobody has come back alive with any proof?

They must have been all killed by the killer Nazi penguin sentries!
"E pur si muove" ("And yet it moves"); Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

?

Skeptek

  • 207
  • +0/-0
  • White Hats for Whirled Peas
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #6 on: June 13, 2009, 10:15:34 AM »
REALLY?!  Not permitted?  You must be joking.
When do we all drink the Kool-Aid?
Enjoy my posts?  Learn more here:
Not just another Flat Earth website... All are welcome.

(Thanks, Daniel.

*

3 Tesla

  • 808
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth double agent
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2009, 10:28:15 AM »
REALLY?!  Not permitted?  You must be joking.

Er he's being serious for once, actually ...

NASA faked the Moon landing photos and all of their other photos are also fake as per "The Great Round Earth Conspiracy Theory".

And in retalliation we tend to draw into question the validity of all Flat Earth photos.
"E pur si muove" ("And yet it moves"); Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

*

3 Tesla

  • 808
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth double agent
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2009, 11:22:50 AM »
They must have been all killed by the killer Nazi penguin sentries!

Just to justify my satire, look up "Nazi UFO Antarctica" on the WWW sometime.

See, for example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_ufos

The New Schwabia thing has been referenced at least once by a Flat Earther to my recolection.

Edit: here is the link for that reference (actually on the .net site) =

http://theflatearthsociety.net/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=50baccb19e8f002dd230774453ea5918&topic=829.0
« Last Edit: June 13, 2009, 11:29:13 AM by 3 Tesla »
"E pur si muove" ("And yet it moves"); Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

?

Abysmal

  • 168
  • +0/-0
  • now with more tentacles
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2009, 12:54:28 PM »
even if someone had a picture of themselves with an ice wall sniper on the top of the "gigantic wall of ice no one has noticed yet", the Fe'ers wouldn't accept it.

Acutually, neither would I, because the earth is round.
Former Satanic Conspirator-now i've seen the bendy light.

*

3 Tesla

  • 808
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth double agent
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #10 on: June 13, 2009, 01:23:15 PM »
even if someone had a picture of themselves with an ice wall sniper on the top of the "gigantic wall of ice no one has noticed yet", the Fe'ers wouldn't accept it.

Acutually, neither would I, because the earth is round.

Antarctica is a huge 'red herring' when it comes to Flat/Round Earth debate, I think, because it is so isolated whichever model you adhere to.

For a looooong time I and a few other Round Earthers tried to use the Antactic "midnight sun" as an argument (over on the .net site) why Antarctica *had* to be at the bottom of a global Earth (*) ...

(If Antactica is a ring of ice around a big Flat earth then The Sun has to disappear over to the other side for at least half of every day.)

But the Flat Earthers just either:

Dimissed out of hand our 'proof' - always second hand at best - as lies perpetrated by 'The Great Round Earth Conspiracy'

Or made up arguments about The Sun's image reflecting off ice crystals from one side of the disc to other.

Whilst the latter is patently ludicrous to most people. we couldn't prove it because we could not go to Antarctica.

Edit 2: and no Flat Earther would want to mount an expedition to Antactica to gather their own data because they don't want to be killed by the guards that The Conspiracy place there. (That's a *lot* of Antactic coastline and a *lot* of guards - but it's still true, apparently.)

Any proof of a Round Earth has to be based on what we can see or do where we are because Flat Earthers tend to dismiss second or third hand accounts as lies.

But even then a sufficiently zealous Flat Earther is never going to admit defeat ... but it's fun trying!

(*) Edit - here is a link to one of the later "midnight sun" threads which links to previous ones:

http://theflatearthsociety.net/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=50baccb19e8f002dd230774453ea5918&topic=526.0

The debate could be described as a draw at best ...
« Last Edit: June 13, 2009, 01:31:21 PM by 3 Tesla »
"E pur si muove" ("And yet it moves"); Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

?

Pope Zera

  • 329
  • +0/-0
  • A Firm Believer in NOTHING
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2009, 02:49:06 AM »
Don't climb me, baby.  Take it slow.  Real slow.  Then real fast.

?

Skeptek

  • 207
  • +0/-0
  • White Hats for Whirled Peas
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #12 on: June 14, 2009, 05:41:30 PM »
Ok.  So, one post from an FE'er in this entire thread, and the only answer once again is to invoke the TGC ("Talisman of the Grand Conspiracy") by way of the "snipers" on the ice wall.

Is the ice wall a difficult one or just not a favorite?  The quiet here is a far cry from some other topics I've created.  I must admit, I'm quite surprised this topic has not been hijacked completely yet.  That is something.

What do you say, folks?  I've asked some interesting questions, I think.  I'm wondering if there is any scientific explanation for anything I've asked.
When do we all drink the Kool-Aid?
Enjoy my posts?  Learn more here:
Not just another Flat Earth website... All are welcome.

(Thanks, Daniel.

*

3 Tesla

  • 808
  • +0/-0
  • Flat Earth double agent
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #13 on: June 15, 2009, 03:14:20 AM »
Ok.  So, one post from an FE'er in this entire thread, and the only answer once again is to invoke the TGC ("Talisman of the Grand Conspiracy") by way of the "snipers" on the ice wall.

Hundreds of Round Earth scientists say that Antarctica is a huge continent sitting at the "bottom" of a Global Earth.

And to back this up they have published evidence such as mutiple aircraft crossings of the continent in order to map the below-ice terrain with radar (as done by my old Vice Chancellor who led the British Antarctic Survey for a number of years).

A handful of Flat Earth proponents say that Antarctica is a huge continent which encircles the "edge" of a Flat Earth.

And to back this up they have ...

Done bugger all.

So who are you going to believe, eh?

Editted for effect.
« Last Edit: June 15, 2009, 03:16:03 AM by 3 Tesla »
"E pur si muove" ("And yet it moves"); Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #14 on: June 15, 2009, 03:58:29 AM »
A handful of Flat Earth proponents say that Antarctica is a huge continent which encircles the "edge" of a Flat Earth.

And to back this up they have ...

Done bugger all.

So who are you going to believe, eh?

Editted for effect.

When James Clark Ross sailed along the coast of the Ice Wall he reported sailing a distance of over 60,000 miles. You can read all about it in Earth Not a Globe, Zetetic Cosmogony, and 100 Proofs, all of which are linked and available in my signature link.

Here's a quote from an article in Modern Mechanics:

    "Voliva maintains that there is no South Pole, and that it is 60,000 miles around the southern ice wall. Captain Gunnar Isachsen, the Norwegian explorer, last winter circumnavigated the Antarctic continent in a voyage of about 14,000 miles. Zion says Isachsen may have circumnavigated something, possibly an island of that size, but did not go around the antarctic ice rim, and points to the 60,000 mile journey of Ross in 1848 and the following two years, when he circumnavigated the ice rim."

*

Moon squirter

  • 1405
  • +0/-0
  • Ding dong!
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #15 on: June 15, 2009, 04:45:57 AM »
All your sources are flat earth related.

Modern accounts contract this one-off, unrepeated claim.  For example on  http://www.antarcticacup.com/x_HOME.CFM: "Russian solo circumnavigator Fedor Konyukhov returned to Albany, Western Australia, a hero today, throwing down the gauntlet to yachtsmen around the world to break his 102 day record around the Antarctica Cup Racetrack."
« Last Edit: June 15, 2009, 05:20:09 AM by Moon squirter »
I haven't performed it and I've never claimed to. I've have trouble being in two places at the same time.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #16 on: June 15, 2009, 05:03:46 AM »
All your sources are flat earth related.

Modern accounts contract this one-off, unrepeated claim.  For example on  http://www.antarcticacup.com/x_HOME.CFM: "Russian solo circumnavigator Fedor Konyukhov returned to Albany, Western Australia, a hero today, throwing down the gauntlet to yachtsmen around the world to break his 102 day record around the Antarctica Cup Racetrack."

Any evidence that Fedor Konyukhov went around the Ice Rim and not an icy island like Gunnar Isachsen did?

*

Moon squirter

  • 1405
  • +0/-0
  • Ding dong!
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #17 on: June 15, 2009, 05:19:02 AM »
Any evidence that Fedor Konyukhov went around the Ice Rim and not an icy island like Gunnar Isachsen did?

His log can be downloaded.   The course he took was tracked as follows:



Come to think of it, why not book yourself on to a Condor Journeys and Adventures "Full Circumnavigation of Antarctica".  Here is the course:



The 66 days (13,000 miles) trip was established back in 1997 and is rated as "easy".
Surely the FES could raise $18,000 ?
I haven't performed it and I've never claimed to. I've have trouble being in two places at the same time.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2009, 05:23:19 AM »
His log can be downloaded.   The course he took was tracked as follows:



Come to think of it, why not book yourself on to a Condor Journeys and Adventures "Full Circumnavigation of Antarctica".  Here is the course:



The 66 days (13,000 miles) trip was established back in 1997 and is rated as "easy".
Surely the FES could raise $18,000 ?

How do we know that Konyukhov was circumnavigating the Ice Rim and not an icy island off the coast of Australia, Africa, and South America, as illustrated here: http://theflatearthsociety.net/forum/index.php?topic=544.0

*

Moon squirter

  • 1405
  • +0/-0
  • Ding dong!
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #19 on: June 15, 2009, 05:41:41 AM »
How do we know that Konyukhov was circumnavigating the Ice Rim and not an icy island off the coast of Australia, Africa, and South America, as illustrated here: http://theflatearthsociety.net/forum/index.php?topic=544.0

Have you any evidence that he did fake it?

Saying "It could have been faked" is worthless (a plea something we don't know) unless you have some evidence to back it up. 

I am saying that this is much stronger evidence for a RE than your ancient FE heresy.  I also urge you to consider the Full Circumnavigation of Antarctica cruise.

I haven't performed it and I've never claimed to. I've have trouble being in two places at the same time.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #20 on: June 15, 2009, 05:43:04 AM »
Quote
Have you any evidence that he did fake it?

I didn't say that he faked it. I'm asking you to demonstrate that he went around the Ice Rim and not anything else.

Quote
I am saying that this is much stronger evidence for a RE than your ancient FE heresy.  I also urge you to consider the Full Circumnavigation of Antarctica cruise.

How do we know that that ship is going around the Ice Rim and not anything else?

?

cdenley

  • 296
  • +0/-0
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #21 on: June 15, 2009, 07:18:04 AM »
How do we know that that ship is going around the Ice Rim and not anything else?

Well, it appears it stops in Argentina and New Zealand. You can book yourself a trip and bring a compass. Are there any flat earth fantasies to explain compass readings contradicting a flat earth?

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #22 on: June 15, 2009, 07:24:52 AM »
How do we know that that ship is going around the Ice Rim and not anything else?

Well, it appears it stops in Argentina and New Zealand. You can book yourself a trip and bring a compass. Are there any flat earth fantasies to explain compass readings contradicting a flat earth?

Please see the above link. It's perfectly possible for a ship circumnavigating a landmass off the coast of Australia to visit two or more of the southern countries.

http://i44.tinypic.com/i50zns.png
« Last Edit: June 15, 2009, 07:26:29 AM by Tom Bishop »

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #23 on: June 15, 2009, 07:39:06 AM »
Ignorance is worthless Tom.

The ship is going around antarctica because thats what they say happens. Hundreds of people have travelled with this company taking the much shorter journey time than the FE model predicts.

How do you account for this fact?


Please see the above link. It's perfectly possible for a ship circumnavigating a landmass off the coast of Australia to visit two or more of the southern countries.

http://i44.tinypic.com/i50zns.png

?

cdenley

  • 296
  • +0/-0
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #24 on: June 15, 2009, 09:00:57 AM »
Please see the above link. It's perfectly possible for a ship circumnavigating a landmass off the coast of Australia to visit two or more of the southern countries.

http://i44.tinypic.com/i50zns.png

So now you explain contradictions in FET by inventing a new continent? That's not extraordinary at all. If someone aboard the ship happened to have a compass, what would you expect it to show during the trip?

?

Skeptek

  • 207
  • +0/-0
  • White Hats for Whirled Peas
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2009, 09:26:16 AM »
Hundreds of Round Earth scientists say that Antarctica is a huge continent sitting at the "bottom" of a Global Earth.

And to back this up they have published evidence such as mutiple aircraft crossings of the continent in order to map the below-ice terrain with radar (as done by my old Vice Chancellor who led the British Antarctic Survey for a number of years).

A handful of Flat Earth proponents say that Antarctica is a huge continent which encircles the "edge" of a Flat Earth.

And to back this up they have ...

Done bugger all.

So who are you going to believe, eh?

Editted for effect.

When James Clark Ross sailed along the coast of the Ice Wall he reported sailing a distance of over 60,000 miles. You can read all about it in Earth Not a Globe, Zetetic Cosmogony, and 100 Proofs, all of which are linked and available in my signature link.

Here's a quote from an article in Modern Mechanics:

    "Voliva maintains that there is no South Pole, and that it is 60,000 miles around the southern ice wall. Captain Gunnar Isachsen, the Norwegian explorer, last winter circumnavigated the Antarctic continent in a voyage of about 14,000 miles. Zion says Isachsen may have circumnavigated something, possibly an island of that size, but did not go around the antarctic ice rim, and points to the 60,000 mile journey of Ross in 1848 and the following two years, when he circumnavigated the ice rim."
Ok, so the answer to "hundreds of scientists" is the unverified story of one man/crew and a quote from a famous FE'er?  I fail to see any argument here, and yet everyone is just discussing these two, very insignificant items as though they have meaning.  Nothing can come of this.

Where is the actual scientific evidence (acquired using The Scientific Method and already accepted by both sides)?
When do we all drink the Kool-Aid?
Enjoy my posts?  Learn more here:
Not just another Flat Earth website... All are welcome.

(Thanks, Daniel.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2009, 09:34:16 AM »
Quote
So now you explain contradictions in FET by inventing a new continent? That's not extraordinary at all.

It's not extraordinary if it was there the whole time.

Quote
If someone aboard the ship happened to have a compass, what would you expect it to show during the trip?

The compass would align with the magnetic field lines.

Quote
Ok, so the answer to "hundreds of scientists" is the unverified story of one man/crew and a quote from a famous FE'er?  I fail to see any argument here, and yet everyone is just discussing these two, very insignificant items as though they have meaning.  Nothing can come of this.

Where is the actual scientific evidence (acquired using The Scientific Method and already accepted by both sides)?

Sir James Clark Ross' trip is exploratory evidence.

*

Moon squirter

  • 1405
  • +0/-0
  • Ding dong!
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2009, 09:40:48 AM »
Quote
Have you any evidence that he did fake it?

I didn't say that he faked it. I'm asking you to demonstrate that he went around the Ice Rim and not anything else.

Quote
I am saying that this is much stronger evidence for a RE than your ancient FE heresy.  I also urge you to consider the Full Circumnavigation of Antarctica cruise.

How do we know that that ship is going around the Ice Rim and not anything else?

Your evidence - Second-hand FE hearsay.
My evidence  -  Current, with the Log from the person who made the voyage.

I wonder which one most people would choose ?
I haven't performed it and I've never claimed to. I've have trouble being in two places at the same time.

*

lexotan

  • 159
  • +0/-0
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2009, 09:42:23 AM »

Sir James Clark Ross' trip is exploratory evidence.

and hundreds of RE exploratory trips aren't evidence?

?

cdenley

  • 296
  • +0/-0
Re: About that "150 foot wall of ice"...
« Reply #29 on: June 15, 2009, 09:56:50 AM »
It's not extraordinary if it was there the whole time.
It is extraordinary to think the RET model of earth can be so inaccurate, yet nobody seems to have trouble using it for navigation.

The compass would align with the magnetic field lines.
And where are these magnetic field lines on your flat earth? Would the compass always point away from this continent the conspiring cruise line tells us is Antarctica?