Radar range

  • 16 Replies
  • 2894 Views
*

ForgedInStone

  • 34
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Radar range
« on: May 25, 2009, 03:11:41 AM »
If the earth was flat as you claim, any ship radar should have unlimited range.

Anyone can go see a radar demonstration. They have different range, according to the ship model and the ship's function. (Civilian/Military)


Air does not influence radio waves in any way, except for slowing them down.
Glory to God alone.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Radar range
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2009, 09:51:56 AM »
Air does not influence radio waves in any way, except for slowing them down.

Air also absorbs photons.

*

ForgedInStone

  • 34
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: Radar range
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2009, 10:39:39 AM »
Radars do not use photons.
Glory to God alone.

?

grogberries

  • 3468
  • +0/-0
  • I am large! I contain multitudes!
Re: Radar range
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2009, 10:43:26 AM »
Radar uses electromagnetic radiation. It does use photons.
Think hard. Think Flat.

*

WardoggKC130FE

  • 11833
  • +0/-0
  • What website is that? MadeUpMonkeyShit.com?
Re: Radar range
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2009, 01:14:23 PM »
Radars do not use photons.


Oops, you failed there a little on yourself.  Might want to get that cleaned up before it stains.  Ohhhhh too late. 

?

Wulphy

  • 10
  • +0/-0
Re: Radar range
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2009, 04:39:35 PM »
Air's absorption rate of photons is minuscule, and is not nearly high enough to effect the range of radars to the extent that you are suggesting. Learn some basic chemistry and physics.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Radar range
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2009, 04:54:49 PM »
Air's absorption rate of photons is minuscule

Actually, it isn't.

?

Wulphy

  • 10
  • +0/-0
Re: Radar range
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2009, 04:55:39 PM »
Air's absorption rate of photons is minuscule

Actually, it isn't.

Actually, it is.

?

grogberries

  • 3468
  • +0/-0
  • I am large! I contain multitudes!
Re: Radar range
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2009, 05:06:10 PM »
At a large distance it would.
Think hard. Think Flat.

?

Wulphy

  • 10
  • +0/-0
Re: Radar range
« Reply #9 on: May 25, 2009, 05:08:54 PM »
At a MUCH larger distance than what you idiots are implying.

?

Mr Tea

  • 55
  • +0/-0
Re: Radar range
« Reply #10 on: May 25, 2009, 05:55:46 PM »
Fighting over radar...

good times.
"Earl Gray, hot"- Capt.Picard.

*

FET4EVER

  • 12
  • +0/-0
Re: Radar range
« Reply #11 on: May 25, 2009, 07:07:00 PM »
If the earth was flat as you claim, any ship radar should have unlimited range.

Anyone can go see a radar demonstration. They have different range, according to the ship model and the ship's function. (Civilian/Military)
Hang on, say that again....

Quote
Anyone can go see a radar demonstration. They have different range, according to the ship model and the ship's function. (Civilian/Military)
Hm, well that just blows your entire premise right out of the water.  Thank you for destroying your own argument for us.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45121
  • +90/-131
Re: Radar range
« Reply #12 on: May 25, 2009, 07:23:22 PM »
Air's absorption rate of photons is minuscule

Actually, it isn't.

Actually, it depends on the wavelength of the photon.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

grogberries

  • 3468
  • +0/-0
  • I am large! I contain multitudes!
Re: Radar range
« Reply #13 on: May 25, 2009, 07:55:51 PM »
Would wind have anything to do with it, too? In the open see it is bound to be more windy? And also temperature?
Think hard. Think Flat.

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45121
  • +90/-131
Re: Radar range
« Reply #14 on: May 25, 2009, 08:06:11 PM »
Would wind have anything to do with it, too? In the open see it is bound to be more windy? And also temperature?

Why would wind affect EM propagation?  ???  Temperature can affect EM waves by causing refraction due to density variations (e.g. mirages, etc.).
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

?

grogberries

  • 3468
  • +0/-0
  • I am large! I contain multitudes!
Re: Radar range
« Reply #15 on: May 25, 2009, 08:09:43 PM »
Because the wind would cause the air particles to bump into radar waves more often? I was just thinking out loud.
Think hard. Think Flat.

*

ForgedInStone

  • 34
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earther
Re: Radar range
« Reply #16 on: May 26, 2009, 11:02:32 AM »
If the earth was flat as you claim, any ship radar should have unlimited range.

Anyone can go see a radar demonstration. They have different range, according to the ship model and the ship's function. (Civilian/Military)
Hang on, say that again....

Quote
Anyone can go see a radar demonstration. They have different range, according to the ship model and the ship's function. (Civilian/Military)
Hm, well that just blows your entire premise right out of the water.  Thank you for destroying your own argument for us.

You can bounce off different wavelengths from the ionosphere.

Also, range is limited by the output power of the transmitter/receiver.
Glory to God alone.