Yes, I am going through all this because you were off by 20MHz or more.
I think you are going through all this for one of two reasons.
1) You saw a discussion that you knew something about: radio. You figured you would take advantage of my statement of 10MHz and below to show the forum what you knew about the topic. I assume you are a ham enthusiast since you referenced it numerous times, so I am sure you know something about radio.
The one I find more likely:
2) You saw the discussion about radio and given your ham experience you thought you knew all about EM theory. So when you saw my post about the ionosphere not reflecting back all frequencies of radio, you thought, "What nonsense!" Now you start to argue about radio like I don't know what it is, and proceed to tell me how wrong I am. Then I post supporting evidence for my claim, which was slightly off, and you realize you had no idea that I was right.
Why do I believe this to be so? Let's review your posts:
TheEngineer, obviously radio theory is not your strong suit. I respect a lot of what you are saying but you should leave radio theory alone.
Such a strong statement to make just because I was off by 20MHz on the range...Or could it be because you thought I was totally wrong?
Frequencies below 100 MHz are frequently bounced.
Hmm...you just admitted that the threshold was 30MHz.
Again, Engineer, radio is not your stong suit, stay away from it.
Not my strong suit because of a 20MHz error? Even though everything else I stated about the nuances of EM radiation was right - all throughout this entire thread? Or not my strong suit because you thought you were right?