« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

moon gravity

  • 25 Replies
  • 4756 Views
*

Sexual Harassment Panda

  • 7071
  • +0/-0
  • Now more sophisticated
moon gravity
« on: September 14, 2008, 07:59:30 AM »
so i was trolling and then i was thinking is there *gravity* on the moon in the FE model
Logged
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||_____          
|     STFU          |||""'|"""\___            O
| ______________|||___|__|__|)          -|- 
  (@)@)""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)          / \

New Flat Earth FAQ: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30512.0
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2008, 09:30:50 AM »
Please use "gravitation" next time. And yes, quite possibly, if it could explain the effects of gravitational differentiation on FE.
Logged
*

Sexual Harassment Panda

  • 7071
  • +0/-0
  • Now more sophisticated
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2008, 07:16:11 PM »
Quote from: E.Jack on September 14, 2008, 09:30:50 AM
Please use "gravitation" next time. And yes, quite possibly, if it could explain the effects of gravitational differentiation on FE.
oh ok so the gravitation of the moon causes pls weight to be smaller like on mt everest   does it cause tides like in the re model
Logged
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||_____          
|     STFU          |||""'|"""\___            O
| ______________|||___|__|__|)          -|- 
  (@)@)""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)          / \

New Flat Earth FAQ: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30512.0
?

REmyth

  • 35
  • +0/-0
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2008, 04:02:50 AM »
they're marely the byproduct of the earth tilting.
Logged
*

MadDogX

  • 735
  • +0/-0
  • Resistor is fubar!
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2008, 04:24:15 AM »
Quote from: REmyth on September 15, 2008, 04:02:50 AM
If the theory of Flat Earth in its current form turns out to be correct, then the tides can be assumed to be a byproduct of the Earth tilting.

There, fixed that for you.
Logged
Quote from: Professor Gaypenguin
I want an Orion slave woman :(
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 05, 2008, 12:45:49 PM
Okay, I admit it.  The earth isn't flat.
*

Sexual Harassment Panda

  • 7071
  • +0/-0
  • Now more sophisticated
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2008, 01:14:37 PM »
Quote from: MadDogX on September 15, 2008, 04:24:15 AM
Quote from: REmyth on September 15, 2008, 04:02:50 AM
If the theory of Flat Earth in its current form turns out to be correct, then the tides can be assumed to be a byproduct of the Earth tilting.

There, fixed that for you.
wow thank you for making that really clear
Logged
|^^^^^^^^^^^\||_____          
|     STFU          |||""'|"""\___            O
| ______________|||___|__|__|)          -|- 
  (@)@)""""""**|(@)(@)**|(@)          / \

New Flat Earth FAQ: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30512.0
*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2008, 02:07:00 PM »
What is making the earth tilt? If gravity as explained by RE theory doesn't exist in FE, then the moon or sun would be exempt as the cause, so tell me how it's possible...
Logged
?

REmyth

  • 35
  • +0/-0
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #7 on: September 16, 2008, 12:41:02 AM »
This was recently discussed at one of our FE meatings.

basically the most compelling theory put forth (in my opinion) were that earthquakes gradually overtime cause very minor fluctuations (although still significant) in the earths acceleration of (1g, 9.8m/s^2). with a significant amount of water being favored to one side of the world the result would be the earth tilting even greater.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2008, 12:46:48 AM by REmyth »
Logged
*

MadDogX

  • 735
  • +0/-0
  • Resistor is fubar!
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #8 on: September 16, 2008, 12:46:53 AM »
Quote from: REmyth on September 16, 2008, 12:41:02 AM
This was recently discussed at one of our FE meatings.

basically the most compelling theory put forth (in my opinion) were that earthquakes gradually overtime cause very minor fluctuations (although still significant) in the earths acceleration of (1g, 9.8m/s^2). with a significant amount of water being more forced to one side of the world the result would be the earth tilting even greater.


Where do your FE meatings [sic] occur? I would really love to attend one.
Logged
Quote from: Professor Gaypenguin
I want an Orion slave woman :(
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 05, 2008, 12:45:49 PM
Okay, I admit it.  The earth isn't flat.
?

REmyth

  • 35
  • +0/-0
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #9 on: September 16, 2008, 12:52:42 AM »
FE believers only sorry.
Logged
*

MadDogX

  • 735
  • +0/-0
  • Resistor is fubar!
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #10 on: September 16, 2008, 12:58:00 AM »
Quote from: REmyth on September 16, 2008, 12:52:42 AM
FE believers only sorry.


Why, are your discussions secret or are you scared of inviting people with contradicting opinions?
Logged
Quote from: Professor Gaypenguin
I want an Orion slave woman :(
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 05, 2008, 12:45:49 PM
Okay, I admit it.  The earth isn't flat.
?

REmyth

  • 35
  • +0/-0
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #11 on: September 16, 2008, 01:23:35 AM »
we only have 2 hours a week to share our current knowledge/ideas about FE not RE.

we come to places like these to hear the voice of other opinions

No other reason i assure you.
Logged
?

spacemanjones

  • 281
  • +0/-0
  • Magic pushes earth
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #12 on: September 16, 2008, 03:23:44 AM »
Quote from: REmyth on September 16, 2008, 01:23:35 AM
we only have 2 hours a week to share our current knowledge/ideas about FE not RE.

we come to places like these to hear the voice of other opinions

No other reason i assure you.

I bet Tom brings the weed.
Logged
*

MadDogX

  • 735
  • +0/-0
  • Resistor is fubar!
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2008, 03:27:03 AM »
Quote from: spacemanjones on September 16, 2008, 03:23:44 AM
Quote from: REmyth on September 16, 2008, 01:23:35 AM
we only have 2 hours a week to share our current knowledge/ideas about FE not RE.

we come to places like these to hear the voice of other opinions

No other reason i assure you.

I bet Tom brings the weed.


Who needs weed when you've got Tom? I feel a little bit of my brain die every time he posts.
Logged
Quote from: Professor Gaypenguin
I want an Orion slave woman :(
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on April 05, 2008, 12:45:49 PM
Okay, I admit it.  The earth isn't flat.
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45131
  • +90/-135
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #14 on: September 16, 2008, 05:10:04 AM »
Quote from: REmyth on September 16, 2008, 01:23:35 AM
we only have 2 hours a week to share our current knowledge/ideas about FE not RE.

we come to places like these to hear the voice of other opinions

No other reason i assure you.

How much time do you guys spend on spelling and grammar?
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
?

Robbyj

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 5455
  • +0/-0
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #15 on: September 16, 2008, 05:11:11 AM »
Much less than they spend on recess apparently.
Logged
Quote from: Raist on January 22, 2009, 09:27:08 PM
Why justify an illegitimate attack with a legitimate response?
?

Munky Fidget

  • 117
  • +0/-0
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #16 on: September 18, 2008, 01:31:54 AM »
More importantly, why has no-one tried to measure this tilting effect with a very accurate spirit level? Surely if you made one big enough you should be able to see the bubble move back and forth each day, even if just a millimeter or two

The sad thing is, I'm really not sure if I'm being serious or not on this one  :-\
« Last Edit: September 18, 2008, 01:33:54 AM by Munky Fidget »
Logged
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #17 on: September 18, 2008, 11:08:40 AM »
Quote from: goldstein on September 16, 2008, 07:46:09 AM
If Tom didn't bring the weed, he wouldn't get invited.

Puuleeeeeze can I come to your next meeting. I promise not to snigger too loud.

OK Joking over.

How come there's two high tides at "opposite" ends of the earth? Does this fit the tilting model? If not why not? (<unreasonable time limit>)

I don't believe in the tilting model.  It's been proposed that there's another moon-like body underneath the earth influencing the tides as well, called the antimoon.  That seems like the most reasonable explanation to me.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
?

C-Ray

  • 706
  • +0/-0
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #18 on: September 18, 2008, 11:33:50 AM »
Quote from: Roundy the Truthinessist on September 18, 2008, 11:08:40 AM
Quote from: goldstein on September 16, 2008, 07:46:09 AM
If Tom didn't bring the weed, he wouldn't get invited.

Puuleeeeeze can I come to your next meeting. I promise not to snigger too loud.

OK Joking over.

How come there's two high tides at "opposite" ends of the earth? Does this fit the tilting model? If not why not? (<unreasonable time limit>)

I don't believe in the tilting model.  It's been proposed that there's another moon-like body underneath the earth influencing the tides as well, called the antimoon.  That seems like the most reasonable explanation to me.

until the Dark Energy force Propelling us through the universe slams the antimoon into the bottom of us.  I would like to place my bets on December 21st, 2012.
Logged
The Earth is Round.
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #19 on: September 18, 2008, 02:58:03 PM »
Quote from: C-Ray on September 18, 2008, 11:33:50 AM
until the Dark Energy force Propelling us through the universe slams the antimoon into the bottom of us.  I would like to place my bets on December 21st, 2012.

Why would the antimoon be accelerating faster than we are?
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #20 on: September 18, 2008, 03:03:54 PM »
I admit, I haven't quite reconciled the DEF with the antimoon theory.  They seem to contradict each other, yet they're both clearly true!  In fact, the DEF is easily the most successful theory ever as its existence has been confirmed repeatedly through observation and experimentation!  And the antimoon theory, while largely speculative, explains our observations so well that it's tough to imagine it could be wrong.  It's definitely a quandary, but I believe with further research and experimentation we should be able to come up with a model that easily incorporates both.  That's the spirit of scientific inquiry.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45131
  • +90/-135
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #21 on: September 18, 2008, 06:38:28 PM »
Quote from: Osama  bin Laden on September 18, 2008, 02:58:03 PM
Quote from: C-Ray on September 18, 2008, 11:33:50 AM
until the Dark Energy force Propelling us through the universe slams the antimoon into the bottom of us.  I would like to place my bets on December 21st, 2012.

Why would the antimoon be accelerating faster than we are?

UA + gravitational attraction - anything to keep the anti-moon from smashing into the bottom of the FE = no more anti-moon
Logged
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #22 on: September 18, 2008, 09:03:42 PM »
The DEF is one of the most genius ideas of FE. I love it and I'm unifying one of my theories with it.
Logged
*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36019
  • +0/-0
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #23 on: September 18, 2008, 10:33:05 PM »
Quote from: markjo on September 18, 2008, 06:38:28 PM
UA + gravitational attraction - anything to keep the anti-moon from smashing into the bottom of the FE = no more anti-moon

See response in other thread.
Logged
Quote from: Ævan on August 11, 2013, 01:18:20 PM
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.
*

Iamnotanastronaut

  • 6
  • +0/-0
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #24 on: September 19, 2008, 05:50:38 PM »
Quote from: E.Jack on September 18, 2008, 09:03:42 PM
The DEF is one of the most genius ideas of FE. I love it and I'm unifying one of my theories with it.

Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: moon gravity
« Reply #25 on: September 19, 2008, 07:38:27 PM »
Def Leppard is good.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »