These "answers" you FErs are throwing around fail to adequately explain simple natural phenomena that the standard model of cosmology explains and predicts. The fact that you people feel like you can even call yourselves "scientific" without even knowing what the simple, logic driven, pursuit of science is, is disturbing. You don't get to pick and choose what science you "believe" in just because it agrees/disagrees with what you "believe" in. Yes and NO are not testable, and observable explanations for your "idea" (no, it's not a scientific theory).
Please explain why an eclipse is elliptical no matter what time of day it occurs.
Please explain why if I change my latitude, I see a different set of stars at night.
Please explain why if I increase my altitude, I can see the horizon grow further and further away from me.
I am familiar with your "theory". My questions are things that can be EASILY explained using the most basic high school science that don't require that you butcher the living hell out of Special Relativity and Newtonian Physics (both elegant and beautiful insights into our universe's fundamental truths with testable, empirical evidence to back them up. The challenge isn't on anyone who doesn't "believe" in your "theory" to prove it wrong, it's up to you to subjugate your HYPOTHESIS to objective, scientific scrutiny and show us that it is a testable THEORY. If any of you had actually done that, you wouldn't be sitting there fuming and seething with hatred for me as you read this. So please, before the flames, feel free to explain my questions.
lrn2scienceright
inb4theearthisspecialandshit