« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 16   Go Down

Solar Size

  • 471 Replies
  • 73715 Views
*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #120 on: March 19, 2008, 07:15:35 PM »
Quote from: Username on March 19, 2008, 01:32:24 PM
Quote from: fshy94 on March 19, 2008, 12:36:16 PM
I'm pretty sure a vector can be divided by a scalar, Username... It just refers to change in velocity per time, so meh...again, not to split hairs.
Its multiplied by the reciprocal of the scalar, not divided
dividing is multiplying by the reciprocal. 1 divided by 1/2 is, 1 times 2/1.
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #121 on: March 19, 2008, 07:23:07 PM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 19, 2008, 12:38:42 PM
That quote is old. I also mixed up what is the first derivative and what is the second. 
Mixing up the first and second derivative would, in no way, lead to your ridiculous claim.  You need to do a lot better to 'stand by your statement'.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #122 on: March 19, 2008, 09:25:12 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 19, 2008, 07:23:07 PM
Quote from: sokarul on March 19, 2008, 12:38:42 PM
That quote is old. I also mixed up what is the first derivative and what is the second. 
Mixing up the first and second derivative would, in no way, lead to your ridiculous claim.  You need to do a lot better to 'stand by your statement'.
It was to show I was wrong another time.  Try and keep up. 
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #123 on: March 19, 2008, 09:29:08 PM »
So, how about backing up your statement?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #124 on: March 19, 2008, 09:36:36 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 19, 2008, 09:29:08 PM
So, how about backing up your statement?

Which one?  I already admitted the one listed above was indeed wrong.  And also the derivative statement. 

Now where's you backing up gravitation=acceleration?
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17679
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #125 on: March 19, 2008, 09:49:03 PM »
Quote from: Saint Raist on March 19, 2008, 07:15:35 PM
Quote from: Username on March 19, 2008, 01:32:24 PM
Quote from: fshy94 on March 19, 2008, 12:36:16 PM
I'm pretty sure a vector can be divided by a scalar, Username... It just refers to change in velocity per time, so meh...again, not to split hairs.
Its multiplied by the reciprocal of the scalar, not divided
dividing is multiplying by the reciprocal. 1 divided by 1/2 is, 1 times 2/1.
No.  Division is the inverse operation of multiplication.  You don't divide vectors, you scalar multiply by the reciprocal.  Vector division is not defined. 
Logged
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.
*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #126 on: March 19, 2008, 09:52:12 PM »
Quote from: Username on March 19, 2008, 09:49:03 PM
Quote from: Saint Raist on March 19, 2008, 07:15:35 PM
Quote from: Username on March 19, 2008, 01:32:24 PM
Quote from: fshy94 on March 19, 2008, 12:36:16 PM
I'm pretty sure a vector can be divided by a scalar, Username... It just refers to change in velocity per time, so meh...again, not to split hairs.
Its multiplied by the reciprocal of the scalar, not divided
dividing is multiplying by the reciprocal. 1 divided by 1/2 is, 1 times 2/1.
No.  Division is the inverse operation of multiplication.  You don't divide vectors, you scalar multiply by the reciprocal.  Vector division is not defined. 
Multiplying by the reciprocal is exactly the same as dividing. sorry. different terms for doing the exact same operation.
Logged
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17679
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #127 on: March 19, 2008, 10:08:05 PM »
I was wrong. Sorry.  I must have read it wrong somewhere.
« Last Edit: March 19, 2008, 10:09:38 PM by Username »
Logged
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #128 on: March 19, 2008, 10:36:22 PM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 18, 2008, 09:12:01 PM
You little kids know I still stand by my claim that I can back up anything I post. 

Now do this one:
Quote from: sokarul on February 27, 2007, 03:22:13 PM
they beieve the Earth is going up at 9.8m/s/s.  The Earth is going like 20 times the speed of light now according to them. 
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #129 on: March 19, 2008, 10:41:18 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 19, 2008, 10:36:22 PM
Quote from: sokarul on March 18, 2008, 09:12:01 PM
You little kids know I still stand by my claim that I can back up anything I post. 

Now do this one:
Quote from: sokarul on February 27, 2007, 03:22:13 PM
they beieve the Earth is going up at 9.8m/s/s.  The Earth is going like 20 times the speed of light now according to them. 

lol man you sure have to dig old.
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #130 on: March 19, 2008, 10:42:41 PM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 19, 2008, 10:41:18 PM
lol man you sure have to dig old.
No, I'm just starting from the beginning.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #131 on: March 19, 2008, 10:49:07 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 19, 2008, 10:42:41 PM
Quote from: sokarul on March 19, 2008, 10:41:18 PM
lol man you sure have to dig old.
No, I'm just starting from the beginning.
Well keep them coming.
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #132 on: March 19, 2008, 11:24:15 PM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 18, 2008, 09:12:01 PM
You little kids know I still stand by my claim that I can back up anything I post. 
Get to it.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

Flatchest

  • 11
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #133 on: March 20, 2008, 12:49:49 AM »
Why did tom bishop create another account?
Logged
*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65192
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #134 on: March 20, 2008, 01:58:00 AM »
Why are you here?
Logged
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #135 on: March 20, 2008, 07:49:32 AM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 19, 2008, 11:24:15 PM
Quote from: sokarul on March 18, 2008, 09:12:01 PM
You little kids know I still stand by my claim that I can back up anything I post. 
Get to it.
I will once you post one up thats not blatantly obvious that its wrong, posted one day after I joined.
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17679
  • President of The Flat Earth Society
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #136 on: March 20, 2008, 08:23:03 AM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 20, 2008, 07:49:32 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 19, 2008, 11:24:15 PM
Quote from: sokarul on March 18, 2008, 09:12:01 PM
You little kids know I still stand by my claim that I can back up anything I post. 
Get to it.
I will once you post one up thats not blatantly obvious that its wrong, posted one day after I joined.
Anything you post, I believe is what you said.
Logged
The illusion is shattered if we ask what goes on behind the scenes.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #137 on: March 20, 2008, 10:06:29 AM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 20, 2008, 07:49:32 AM
I will once you post one up thats not blatantly obvious that its wrong, posted one day after I joined.
You said you could back up anything you post. 

Supposedly, you took modern physics.  Explain your statement despite your 'education'.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

Gabe

  • 485
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #138 on: March 20, 2008, 10:34:09 AM »
Wow, I was so excited to log on and see that my thread got pages and pages of replies in my absence. Skimming through them was horribly disappointing. Did anyone come up with a rebuttal to the freaking sun and not over who said what now?  :'(
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.
*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5179
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #139 on: March 20, 2008, 10:52:19 AM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 18, 2008, 09:12:01 PM
You little kids know I still stand by my claim that I can back up anything I post. 
Cry cry cry.
Logged
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #140 on: March 20, 2008, 12:10:09 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 20, 2008, 10:06:29 AM
Quote from: sokarul on March 20, 2008, 07:49:32 AM
I will once you post one up thats not blatantly obvious that its wrong, posted one day after I joined.
You said you could back up anything you post. 

Supposedly, you took modern physics.  Explain your statement despite your 'education'.
That was easy, my very next post.
Quote from: sokarul on February 27, 2007, 04:23:27 PM
Quote from: Mental on February 27, 2007, 04:14:21 PM
Quote from: sokarul on February 27, 2007, 03:22:13 PM
Quote from: bassmole on February 27, 2007, 03:16:20 PM
I'm interested as to how two orbs when hung side by side will pull towards each other if there is no such thang as gravity in the FE theory.

Also, if the earth is moving upwards at 9.81ms, and you believe in Newtons laws of physics, why when i throw a ball upwards at a greater velocity than 9.81ms does it not appear to "float" in mid-air?
lol they beieve the Earth is going up at 9.8m/s/s.  The Earth is going like 20 times the speed of light now according to them. 

Lol, you don't know nothing about relativistic physics.

Lol you mean the term gamma?  1 over the square root of 1-v^2/c^2.  I know all about relativistic physics.  FEers don't. The relativistic Energy equation E=gamma m c^2 leads to the Earth requiring huge amounts for energy that comes from where?
« Last Edit: March 20, 2008, 01:58:38 PM by sokarul »
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #141 on: March 20, 2008, 01:39:11 PM »
Quote from: Username on March 19, 2008, 10:08:05 PM
I was wrong. Sorry.  I must have read it wrong somewhere.
It's cool.
Logged
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #142 on: March 20, 2008, 06:00:01 PM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 20, 2008, 12:10:09 PM
That was easy, my very next post.
Quote from: sokarul on February 27, 2007, 04:23:27 PM
Lol you mean the term gamma?  1 over the square root of 1-v^2/c^2.  I know all about relativistic physics.  FEers don't. The relativistic Energy equation E=gamma m c^2 leads to the Earth requiring huge amounts for energy that comes from where?
So gamma allows for an object to travel at 20 times the speed of light?  Since when? 

By the way, the irony in the 3rd and 5th sentences is deafening.
« Last Edit: March 20, 2008, 07:38:19 PM by TheEngineer »
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #143 on: March 20, 2008, 09:39:58 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 20, 2008, 06:00:01 PM
Quote from: sokarul on March 20, 2008, 12:10:09 PM
That was easy, my very next post.
Quote from: sokarul on February 27, 2007, 04:23:27 PM
Lol you mean the term gamma?  1 over the square root of 1-v^2/c^2.  I know all about relativistic physics.  FEers don't. The relativistic Energy equation E=gamma m c^2 leads to the Earth requiring huge amounts for energy that comes from where?
So gamma allows for an object to travel at 20 times the speed of light?  Since when? 

By the way, the irony in the 3rd and 5th sentences is deafening.
Where did I say gamma allows for travel at 20 times the speed of light?  Please learn to read. 
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #144 on: March 21, 2008, 03:20:57 AM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 20, 2008, 09:39:58 PM
Where did I say gamma allows for travel at 20 times the speed of light?  Please learn to read. 
You said your very next post explained your prior statement.  The prior statement was that the FE would be traveling at 20 times the speed of light.  The next post was about gamma.  So how does gamma allow for FTL travel?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #145 on: March 21, 2008, 08:34:51 AM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 21, 2008, 03:20:57 AM
Quote from: sokarul on March 20, 2008, 09:39:58 PM
Where did I say gamma allows for travel at 20 times the speed of light?  Please learn to read. 
You said your very next post explained your prior statement.  The prior statement was that the FE would be traveling at 20 times the speed of light.  The next post was about gamma.  So how does gamma allow for FTL travel?
So once again you made something up.

I said I believe in gamma but fe'ers don't.  Thats why they think the earth is going 20 timws the speed of light.  I never once said gamma allows for FTL travel.

When you try to find posts where I am wrong, do not take them out of context.  That it shitty debating and you will be caught. 

Now continue.     
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #146 on: March 21, 2008, 10:03:33 AM »
Quote from: sokarul on March 21, 2008, 08:34:51 AM
I said I believe in gamma but fe'ers don't. 
Since when do FE'ers not believe in gamma?  That's news to me.

It sure does not look like you said that FE'ers don't believe in gamma here:
Quote from: sokarul on February 27, 2007, 03:22:13 PM
lol they beieve the Earth is going up at 9.8m/s/s.  The Earth is going like 20 times the speed of light now according to them. 

Oh, wait, you're making shit up again in order to try to dig your way out of this hole of ignorance you find yourself in...

Quote
Thats why they think the earth is going 20 timws the speed of light.
Since when do FE'ers think that the Earth is going 20 times the speed of light? 

Quote
When you try to find posts where I am wrong, do not take them out of context.
Let me know when I do that.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2008, 10:07:11 AM by TheEngineer »
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #147 on: March 21, 2008, 01:58:32 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on March 21, 2008, 10:03:33 AM
Quote from: sokarul on March 21, 2008, 08:34:51 AM
I said I believe in gamma but fe'ers don't. 
Since when do FE'ers not believe in gamma?  That's news to me.

It sure does not look like you said that FE'ers don't believe in gamma here:
Quote from: sokarul on February 27, 2007, 03:22:13 PM
lol they beieve the Earth is going up at 9.8m/s/s.  The Earth is going like 20 times the speed of light now according to them.  
Try right here.  Do I need to speak slowers so you can understand? 

Quote
Oh, wait, you're making shit up again in order to try to dig your way out of this hole of ignorance you find yourself in...

Nope. The FET does not like physics in general. 
Quote
Since when do FE'ers think that the Earth is going 20 times the speed of light? 
I just picked a number.  Consider 20 to be X. 

Quote
Let me know when I do that.
Ok this one for one. 
You: "Look at sokarul" he doesn't know what general and special relativity is."
Me: "Look at the next post."
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #148 on: March 21, 2008, 02:57:03 PM »
FE'ers don't believe the earth is going past the speed of light. lurk moar.
Logged
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Solar Size
« Reply #149 on: March 21, 2008, 03:43:53 PM »
Quote from: Saint Raist on March 21, 2008, 02:57:03 PM
FE'ers don't believe the earth is going past the speed of light. lurk moar.

It was my second day one the forum. 
Read more. 
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 6 7 ... 16   Go Up
« previous next »