Can you ask them why we see disappearing Sun when the night comes? They say because it's getting too far away but what the hell, we don't see it getting smaller and smaller, we see it disappearing by parts as it goes down the horizont!
And the sun actually appears to be largest when it is rising or setting (same with the moon).
True, true. I could have registered there myself but endless discussions is my weakness I've no wish to spend there hours and hours and even more hours
The conspiracy has made it impossible to adequately explain FE theory in English.
Please Read Chapter 10 of Earth Not a Globe.http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za28.htm
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?
I haven't performed it and I've never claimed to. I've have trouble being in two places at the same time.
Right, I have presented the FE theory to members of a community I am part of, and they (having, I assume, read the FAQ) have a few more questions:Quote from: rus|mike @ my siteCan you ask them why we see disappearing Sun when the night comes? They say because it's getting too far away but what the hell, we don't see it getting smaller and smaller, we see it disappearing by parts as it goes down the horizont!Quote from: stewsburntmonkey @ my siteAnd the sun actually appears to be largest when it is rising or setting (same with the moon).Quote from: rus|mike @ my siteTrue, true. I could have registered there myself but endless discussions is my weakness I've no wish to spend there hours and hours and even more hours So, can someone clarify? I'm not sure of the actual theory.
It's no slur if it's fact.
Quote from: stewsburntmonkey @ my siteAnd the sun actually appears to be largest when it is rising or setting (same with the moon).Quote from: rus|mike @ my siteTrue, true.
True, true.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
Read the FAQ and lurk more.
Quote from: rus|mike @ my siteCan you ask them why we see disappearing Sun when the night comes? They say because it's getting too far away but what the hell, we don't see it getting smaller and smaller, we see it disappearing by parts as it goes down the horizont!Light "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.
Quote from: stewsburntmonkey @ my siteAnd the sun actually appears to be largest when it is rising or setting (same with the moon).Thats an optical illusion in RE theory too, look it up. Its just because its near the ground.
Quote from: Username on February 12, 2008, 09:07:43 PMLight "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.You have no evidence to support your claim.
Light "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.
Quote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:51:26 PMQuote from: Username on February 12, 2008, 09:07:43 PMLight "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.You have no evidence to support your claim. Sure I do, go to any dock on a clear day and watch the ships as they sail away.
Quote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 01:54:53 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:51:26 PMQuote from: Username on February 12, 2008, 09:07:43 PMLight "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.You have no evidence to support your claim. Sure I do, go to any dock on a clear day and watch the ships as they sail away.Thats not proof as a globe would have the exact same effect. Although it really wouldn't because on a flat earth the ship would just shrink. The "bending light theory" started on this site was also owned long ago.
Quote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:57:35 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 01:54:53 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:51:26 PMQuote from: Username on February 12, 2008, 09:07:43 PMLight "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.You have no evidence to support your claim. Sure I do, go to any dock on a clear day and watch the ships as they sail away.Thats not proof as a globe would have the exact same effect. Although it really wouldn't because on a flat earth the ship would just shrink. The "bending light theory" started on this site was also owned long ago. There is a difference between proof and evidence. I can see your english hasn't improved.
Also would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site.
Quote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 07:01:41 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:57:35 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 01:54:53 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:51:26 PMQuote from: Username on February 12, 2008, 09:07:43 PMLight "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.You have no evidence to support your claim. Sure I do, go to any dock on a clear day and watch the ships as they sail away.Thats not proof as a globe would have the exact same effect. Although it really wouldn't because on a flat earth the ship would just shrink. The "bending light theory" started on this site was also owned long ago. There is a difference between proof and evidence. I can see your english hasn't improved.I see your physics haven't changed.QuoteAlso would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site. I never said there was a force. I said someone else tried to say there was and it was owned. Gravitation does bend light but its not a force.
Quote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 09:45:01 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 07:01:41 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:57:35 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 01:54:53 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:51:26 PMQuote from: Username on February 12, 2008, 09:07:43 PMLight "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.You have no evidence to support your claim. Sure I do, go to any dock on a clear day and watch the ships as they sail away.Thats not proof as a globe would have the exact same effect. Although it really wouldn't because on a flat earth the ship would just shrink. The "bending light theory" started on this site was also owned long ago. There is a difference between proof and evidence. I can see your english hasn't improved.I see your physics haven't changed.QuoteAlso would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site. I never said there was a force. I said someone else tried to say there was and it was owned. Gravitation does bend light but its not a force. I never said you said there was a force... And so again:QuoteAlso would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site.
Quote from: Username on February 14, 2008, 02:12:49 AMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 09:45:01 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 07:01:41 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:57:35 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 01:54:53 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:51:26 PMQuote from: Username on February 12, 2008, 09:07:43 PMLight "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.You have no evidence to support your claim. Sure I do, go to any dock on a clear day and watch the ships as they sail away.Thats not proof as a globe would have the exact same effect. Although it really wouldn't because on a flat earth the ship would just shrink. The "bending light theory" started on this site was also owned long ago. There is a difference between proof and evidence. I can see your english hasn't improved.I see your physics haven't changed.QuoteAlso would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site. I never said there was a force. I said someone else tried to say there was and it was owned. Gravitation does bend light but its not a force. I never said you said there was a force... And so again:QuoteAlso would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site. I never said there was a force so why would I show you one? I have no idea what you are trying to get at. YOU said "Light "falls" faster towards the earth" and no you want me to find evidence for you. Well you mad eup the BS so yo u deal with it. Light does not fall faster towards earth. The speed of light never changes. Gravitaiton only bends light and change its frequency.
Quote from: sokarul on February 14, 2008, 11:51:31 AMQuote from: Username on February 14, 2008, 02:12:49 AMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 09:45:01 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 07:01:41 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:57:35 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 01:54:53 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:51:26 PMQuote from: Username on February 12, 2008, 09:07:43 PMLight "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.You have no evidence to support your claim. Sure I do, go to any dock on a clear day and watch the ships as they sail away.Thats not proof as a globe would have the exact same effect. Although it really wouldn't because on a flat earth the ship would just shrink. The "bending light theory" started on this site was also owned long ago. There is a difference between proof and evidence. I can see your english hasn't improved.I see your physics haven't changed.QuoteAlso would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site. I never said there was a force. I said someone else tried to say there was and it was owned. Gravitation does bend light but its not a force. I never said you said there was a force... And so again:QuoteAlso would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site. I never said there was a force so why would I show you one? I have no idea what you are trying to get at. YOU said "Light "falls" faster towards the earth" and no you want me to find evidence for you. Well you mad eup the BS so yo u deal with it. Light does not fall faster towards earth. The speed of light never changes. Gravitaiton only bends light and change its frequency. No the speed doesn't. You are right. I never said the speed changed, I said it falls faster. There is a difference.And the theory is that light falls faster over long distances due to a fifth force. You said this was shown before on these forums to be false. I would like to see where. If you would just like to show me the thread where it shows light doesn't 'fall faster', that will work also.
Quote from: Username on February 14, 2008, 12:08:38 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 14, 2008, 11:51:31 AMQuote from: Username on February 14, 2008, 02:12:49 AMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 09:45:01 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 07:01:41 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:57:35 PMQuote from: Username on February 13, 2008, 01:54:53 PMQuote from: sokarul on February 13, 2008, 01:51:26 PMQuote from: Username on February 12, 2008, 09:07:43 PMLight "falls" faster towards the earth; it has light attracting properties over "longer" distances. This is the mechanism behind Rowbotham's perspective laws.You have no evidence to support your claim. Sure I do, go to any dock on a clear day and watch the ships as they sail away.Thats not proof as a globe would have the exact same effect. Although it really wouldn't because on a flat earth the ship would just shrink. The "bending light theory" started on this site was also owned long ago. There is a difference between proof and evidence. I can see your english hasn't improved.I see your physics haven't changed.QuoteAlso would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site. I never said there was a force. I said someone else tried to say there was and it was owned. Gravitation does bend light but its not a force. I never said you said there was a force... And so again:QuoteAlso would you mind showing me where a fifth force was postulated to bend light towards earth? I haven't seen that before on this site. I never said there was a force so why would I show you one? I have no idea what you are trying to get at. YOU said "Light "falls" faster towards the earth" and no you want me to find evidence for you. Well you mad eup the BS so yo u deal with it. Light does not fall faster towards earth. The speed of light never changes. Gravitaiton only bends light and change its frequency. No the speed doesn't. You are right. I never said the speed changed, I said it falls faster. There is a difference.And the theory is that light falls faster over long distances due to a fifth force. You said this was shown before on these forums to be false. I would like to see where. If you would just like to show me the thread where it shows light doesn't 'fall faster', that will work also.Its around. I will just tell you, light does not bend due to some "fifth force". That was easy.
wow you are officially narcberry stupid.
epic quote chain.Light is bent by gravity, which acts as a lens. All object with mass exhibit gravity, so yes, light bends around stars and planets in space.What's more, the speed of light is constant IN A VACCUM. When light enters any fluid, it is reduced in speed. This causes refraction. It's about .5 % in the earth's atmosphere, you can see it clearly if you put a pencil in a cup of water. The pencil bends because light travels faster in air than in water, and so bends when it leaves water at an angle.
Quote from: Ltar on February 14, 2008, 03:08:45 PMepic quote chain.Light is bent by gravity, which acts as a lens. All object with mass exhibit gravity, so yes, light bends around stars and planets in space.What's more, the speed of light is constant IN A VACCUM. When light enters any fluid, it is reduced in speed. This causes refraction. It's about .5 % in the earth's atmosphere, you can see it clearly if you put a pencil in a cup of water. The pencil bends because light travels faster in air than in water, and so bends when it leaves water at an angle.There I just quoted you.Now stop saying gravity. Its gravitation.
I will just tell you, light does not bend due to some "fifth force".