Hybrid Solar Eclipses...

How does FET explain away hybrid solar eclipses? I'm interested, because it seems difficult.

For those who don't know, a hybrid solar eclipse occurs when in some areas, there is a total solar eclipse, where the moon completely covers the sun, whereas in another area, the moon does not completely cover the sun, its concentric within the Sun. In RET, its due to the extra distance, but what is it in FET?

EDIT: Before anyone states the obvious, remember that the circles are concentric, not shifted over in one direction or another.

Bump

I think this is like your Southern Hemisphere flight times. Bullet Proof.

Thanks. I'd like to see what the others think, though

I think this is like your Southern Hemisphere flight times. Bullet Proof.

But not FE'er proof. It's explained by magic and pixies. Now that's bulletproof.

That's what irks me the most. That "Because the Earth is special" bs.

Well it is Special. Tom Bishop exists there, and since he is the center of the entire Bishopverse, that makes us special.

Bishops idiocy is infinite. Just like the Earth 

Bishops idiocy is infinite. Just like the Earth 

And his power source, although he seems to have been hacked by the conspiracy, he's now nearly denying it!

Bump

How does FET explain away hybrid solar eclipses? I'm interested, because it seems difficult.

For those who don't know, a hybrid solar eclipse occurs when in some areas, there is a total solar eclipse, where the moon completely covers the sun, whereas in another area, the moon does not completely cover the sun, its concentric within the Sun. In RET, its due to the extra distance, but what is it in FET?

EDIT: Before anyone states the obvious, remember that the circles are concentric, not shifted over in one direction or another.

Obviously you haven't read the FAQ.

Maybe someone hit Tom's casing with a crowbar...

The FAQ states (or doesn't, but we just say it does) that the hybrid solar eclipse is an effect of the shadow object. Which we can't prove. Or see.

So, if we can't prove it, it's down to you to disprove it!

Maybe someone hit Tom's casing with a crowbar...

The FAQ states (or doesn't, but we just say it does) that the hybrid solar eclipse is an effect of the shadow object. Which we can't prove. Or see.

So, if we can't prove it, it's down to you to disprove it!

But that can't be, because the circles are concentric, not shifted, on different sides of the planet!

Quote from: Conspiracy Agent on February 01, 2008, 02:59:24 AM

Maybe someone hit Tom's casing with a crowbar...

The FAQ states (or doesn't, but we just say it does) that the hybrid solar eclipse is an effect of the shadow object. Which we can't prove. Or see.

So, if we can't prove it, it's down to you to disprove it!

But that can't be, because the circles are concentric, not shifted, on different sides of the planet!

That's what they want you to think.

bump

How does FET explain away hybrid solar eclipses? I'm interested, because it seems difficult.

For those who don't know, a hybrid solar eclipse occurs when in some areas, there is a total solar eclipse, where the moon completely covers the sun, whereas in another area, the moon does not completely cover the sun, its concentric within the Sun. In RET, its due to the extra distance, but what is it in FET?

EDIT: Before anyone states the obvious, remember that the circles are concentric, not shifted over in one direction or another.

Holographic side effect of the stars.

Quote from: fshy94 on January 31, 2008, 10:57:10 AM

How does FET explain away hybrid solar eclipses? I'm interested, because it seems difficult.

For those who don't know, a hybrid solar eclipse occurs when in some areas, there is a total solar eclipse, where the moon completely covers the sun, whereas in another area, the moon does not completely cover the sun, its concentric within the Sun. In RET, its due to the extra distance, but what is it in FET?

EDIT: Before anyone states the obvious, remember that the circles are concentric, not shifted over in one direction or another.

Holographic side effect of the stars.

ROFLMAO. Now, any FE'ers, not pranksters?

Sigh. Bump?

Quote from: Viscount Dead Kangaroo on February 05, 2008, 09:23:36 AM

Quote from: fshy94 on January 31, 2008, 10:57:10 AM

How does FET explain away hybrid solar eclipses? I'm interested, because it seems difficult.

For those who don't know, a hybrid solar eclipse occurs when in some areas, there is a total solar eclipse, where the moon completely covers the sun, whereas in another area, the moon does not completely cover the sun, its concentric within the Sun. In RET, its due to the extra distance, but what is it in FET?

EDIT: Before anyone states the obvious, remember that the circles are concentric, not shifted over in one direction or another.

Holographic side effect of the stars.

ROFLMAO. Now, any FE'ers, not pranksters?

Magic shadow object.

Is the only explanation you guys have to this a "mystical shadow object" or a "strange optical illusion," neither of which is ever actually explained? RE's can explain the moons passage in front of the sun, but you guys can't seem to explain it.

There was a lot of joking going on here, but I'd like some real answers from people being serious...

I didn't resurrect this to have people ignore it, c'mon, FE'ers! Show your theories!

Is this a point for RE for which FE has no answer?

I'm just calling this right now: if Tom ever posts in this thread it will be a very large post quoting ENaG excessively. That's usually how these threads go.

There have been tons of topics like this with completely valid points left unexplained by FEers. In the end they are always forgotten - and so FEers continue to not see the mountain of contrary evidence directly in front of them.

How does FET explain away hybrid solar eclipses? I'm interested, because it seems difficult.

For those who don't know, a hybrid solar eclipse occurs when in some areas, there is a total solar eclipse, where the moon completely covers the sun, whereas in another area, the moon does not completely cover the sun, its concentric within the Sun. In RET, its due to the extra distance, but what is it in FET?

EDIT: Before anyone states the obvious, remember that the circles are concentric, not shifted over in one direction or another.

Well yes, during a Solar Eclipse when the moon passes in from of the sun, some people will have a better view of it than others. People right beneath the sun will be able to see a full eclipse, while people a few thousand miles away may see a partial eclipse. This is because people not in the area directly beneath the sun are looking at the eclipse at a different angle.

I don't see what you're getting at.

I think he was getting at the fact that:

the circles are concentric, not shifted over in one direction or another.

In RET, this is due to the fact that the moon is many times closer than the Sun to the Earth. As the distance the observer is from the eclipse grows, the angular diameter of the Moon drops faster than that of the sun, so the Moon appears smaller than the Sun.

In a FE model, this wouldn't happen. The moon and the sun are about the same size and are very close to each other, so an observer moving away from them would not see one of them shrink faster than the other. In fact, due to the fact that the moon would have to move a distance towards the observer to block the sun for a distant observer than for a observer directly underneath, there's a chance that the Moon should grow larger than the Sun as the distance the observer is from the eclipsing objects grows.