Ski lost the privaledge of being treated with civility the moment he dropped any attempt to maintain intellectual honesty and started resorting to lies. Refusing to acknowledge the validity of one's argument because of foul language is a terrible excuse to maintain and support ignorance. Ethical debating went out the window here long before I started becoming hostile, and frankly, since that seems to be the only way you can attack my argument I'd say it reflects quite poorly on your own critical thinking skills.
First off, its "privilege". I know that the Internet is hard to use and it doesn't provide you with all kinds of online dictionaries, but if you could make the effort, it'd really be appreciated by those of us who have to sort through your inanity.
The only "lie" I saw was him conjuring up a faked image of the ISS and lying about the source in an attempt to demonstrate how easy it is to do. A ruse, by the way, that you bought into wholeheartedly and immediately started passing off as genuine. You became abusive primarily after he revealed his ruse and demonstrated you to have been fooled. The fact that you fell for his ruse demonstrated his point if he can be convincing with 5 minutes' effort, that a larger organization such as NASA, with an axe to grind and a large budget, could easily be much more convincing. In that, he made his point excellently and everyone had a good chuckle at your expense. The fact that you continue to throw a hissy fit about it just shows that you're incapable of intelligent, mature discourse.