Moon Landings

  • 11 Replies
  • 3000 Views
?

Riles

  • 315
  • +0/-0
Moon Landings
« on: January 10, 2008, 02:10:16 PM »
If I was raking billions in on faking Moon landings etc I certainly would not have stopped "manned space flight " missions going to the Moon.
Why do you think NASA decided to stop giving us material to support the RE deception , at the same time cutting back the supposed budget to funnel into their nefarious pockets?

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2008, 02:13:41 PM »
Quote
Why do you think NASA decided to stop giving us material to support the RE deception , at the same time cutting back the supposed budget to funnel into their nefarious pockets?

NASA doesn't decide their budget. Congress does.

?

Riles

  • 315
  • +0/-0
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2008, 02:16:28 PM »

NASA doesn't decide their budget. Congress does.

So your saying NASA has influence on schools, Engineers , Airlines etc etc but none on Congress of one country?

?

fshy94

  • 1560
  • +0/-0
  • ^^^ This is the Earth ...die alien invaders!!
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #3 on: January 10, 2008, 02:20:30 PM »
Don't you know? Congress is the least corrupt institution in our country. All the schools and astronomers, and test pilots, and so on, are far more corrupt.  ;D
Proof the Earth is round!
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=19341.0

Quote from: Althalus
The conspiracy has made it impossible to adequately explain FE theory in English.
^^LOL!

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2008, 10:40:10 PM »

NASA doesn't decide their budget. Congress does.

So your saying NASA has influence on schools, Engineers , Airlines etc etc...

No, we're not saying that at all.

Sorry, try again.


~D-Draw

*

Optimus Prime

  • 1147
  • +0/-0
  • Autobot Leader: Keeper of the Matrix of Leadership
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #5 on: January 10, 2008, 10:52:39 PM »
Now hold on a second. Yes you are. In fact you're reversing the whole argument here...

Previously you've stated that NASA and the other space agencies, run by the governments are what run the world (in a nutshell) and have even gone so far to say that some branches of government (including Congress) would not even be aware that they are part of a conspiracy. This is not just to protect them from anything in particular, but to further plausible deniability.

Gotta do better than that.

Dyslexics are teople poo!

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #6 on: January 10, 2008, 11:34:34 PM »
There is a misconception with the stretch of the conspiracy, mostly due to a disagreement within the FEer community. Granted, I find it most logical that NASA does not control the government of any country (they are only given money by the government), and has minimal control over things not concerned with their immediate responsibilities. Obviously, there are exceptions, but most things (education, airlines, et cetera) autonomously run under the assumption that the Earth is round, without NASA having to pop their head in all the time and go, "DON'T FORGET THAT THE EARTH IS ROUND!!" Logically, the conspiracy should only encompass what is necessary. It has its roots in some science, and a few minor things, but mostly the conspiracy doesn't extend beyond what it needs to. And the congress isn't a place that it needs to.

And sure, the extra budget would be nice, but what a scandal it would be if NASA was found to be manipulating/bribing/coercing politicans into giving them the extra budget. I just don't see why they would take the risk.

~D-Draw

?

ash bash

  • 278
  • +0/-0
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2008, 05:14:49 AM »
surely NASA could blackmail the governments of the world for, pretty much anything?
i believe the world is an oblate spheroid. anything i say that contradicts this is purely for the sake of argument.

?

RAM Files

  • 17
  • +0/-0
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2008, 12:25:43 AM »
who says we stopped going to the moon? it's just as likely they found something valuable, and stopped telling us they were going.

?

ash bash

  • 278
  • +0/-0
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2008, 02:56:27 AM »
what could be more valuble than the nasa space budget, even though a lot of it is spent on developing computer imaging software..
i believe the world is an oblate spheroid. anything i say that contradicts this is purely for the sake of argument.

?

JamesNannen

  • 144
  • +0/-0
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #10 on: January 13, 2008, 03:31:05 AM »
Quote
Why do you think NASA decided to stop giving us material to support the RE deception , at the same time cutting back the supposed budget to funnel into their nefarious pockets?

NASA doesn't decide their budget. Congress does.

Thats part of the conspiracy. You just think Congress does but it is another lie.

?

Veritas

  • 5
  • +0/-0
Re: Moon Landings
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2008, 09:53:23 PM »
If I was raking billions in on faking Moon landings etc I certainly would not have stopped "manned space flight " missions going to the Moon.
Why do you think NASA decided to stop giving us material to support the RE deception , at the same time cutting back the supposed budget to funnel into their nefarious pockets?
NASA, nor any space agency, has EVER put a man into space because that would be IMPOSSIBLE.  NASA does not stand for what you think it does.  It really stands for "Non American Secret Agency".  It was an agency created by Russian spies that sought to drain America's finances in order to win the Cold War.  In order to do this, they pretended to be Americans and made up a pack of lies about being able to put men in space.  They lobbied Congress for money (at the time most members of Congress really believed the world was round), and used that money to create a bunch of fake "evidence" of space travel and images of a round Earth in order to fool Congress into giving them MORE money. Their original intention was to nickel and dime America until we were bled dry.  Kennedy was one of the first members of American government to realize that NASA was spending all that money on high tech cameras and computer software to make fake images.  Look where that got him.  Over the years, a few more members of government began to figure it out, and before long, they all knew it.  By then, there was no way to "take out" the entire Congress!  But this was not the end of NASA as many people might think.  The government could not come forward and tell the American people about all the money they wasted, so they swept it the whole thing under the rug.  The government would have cut the NASA program altogether, except they would have no way of explaining the reason why to the people.  Plus, NASA threatened to come out and expose the conspiracy if Congress canceled them.  This is why the government still gives them money.

There is so much UNDENIABLE PROOF that the EARTH IS FLAT!!!!  The FAQ's do a good job explaining most of it, except they didn't explain the NASA conspiracy well enough.  I know this conspiracy is true because my next door neighbors ex-wife's new husband's Uncle was one of the members of Ground Control on the Apollo 12 "mission".  He was telling me about it at a barbecue last summer.  At first I didn't believe him, but he was able to answer every question without batting an eyelash.  Plus he is of Russian descent.  I work in Loss Prevention for a major retailer and I am trained in the art of lie detection, and my training did not indicate that he was lying whatsoever.

You Round Earth people really need to open your eyes and stop talking crazy.  The truth is out there.