The conspiracy at work?

  • 38 Replies
  • 9126 Views
*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
The conspiracy at work?
« on: November 24, 2007, 04:18:12 AM »
The M/S Explorer, Antarctic tourism vessel was struck down in the Antarctic seas. http://www.falklandnews.com/public/story.cfm?get=4760&source=3 could this be evidence of the conspiracy at work?


*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2007, 04:20:27 AM »
PROOF!!!!
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

tommo

  • 505
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2007, 04:24:08 AM »
i don't see any proof
Quote from: jack
I'm special.

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #3 on: November 24, 2007, 04:26:34 AM »
i don't see any proof

you gotta look with your other eyes. Conspiracy eyes.

And it's a little suspicious that they didn't find any reason for the passengers to be evactuated
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

tommo

  • 505
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2007, 04:31:53 AM »
you gotta look with your other eyes. Conspiracy eyes.
And it's a little suspicious that they didn't find any reason for the passengers to be evactuated

hahah conspiracy eyes !! , give me 5 mins ill right back after my conspiracy eyes have given it a look over.
Quote from: jack
I'm special.

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2007, 04:39:39 AM »
Good boy
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #6 on: November 24, 2007, 04:42:27 AM »
PROOF!!!!

I CONCUR! T3H 3ARTH 1S FLATXXORS!!!111!!
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness

?

eric bloedow

Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #7 on: November 24, 2007, 08:33:58 AM »
well, let's see: this ship has been making the same trip to and from antarctica for how long? 10 YEARS?
and in all that time, this is the FIRST real problem it's had?

let me put it this way: if i was part of the conspiracy, i would DOS this website, or arrange an "accident" for Tom Bishop!

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #8 on: November 24, 2007, 10:17:54 AM »
A small torpedo is all it would take.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #9 on: November 24, 2007, 10:49:43 AM »
A small torpedo is all it would take.
I think we'd notice a hole blown in the side of the ship.

there is no conspiracy here. it's called "shit happens".

that or suicide bombers are leaving england and heading for antarctica

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #10 on: November 24, 2007, 11:04:57 AM »
I think we'd notice a hole blown in the side of the ship.

"Wow, look at that hole!  You must have hit an iceberg."


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #11 on: November 24, 2007, 11:44:32 AM »
Surely no one considers that as actual evidence for a conspiracy?  I mean, with so many other plausible explanations and such...

Wait.  Never mind.
The Earth rests on an Infinite stack of Turtles...
Stop raping the llamas!
I'm a platypus gynecologist, damn it!
"I once taught a rabbit to fly with only a string..." -Now

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2007, 11:46:05 AM »
I think we'd notice a hole blown in the side of the ship.

"Wow, look at that hole!  You must have hit an iceberg."
Torpedo damage would show scorch damage and explosive. an iceburg would tear a hole.

*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #13 on: November 24, 2007, 01:10:29 PM »
a kinetic, non-warheaded torpedo might recreate an iceberg strike?

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #14 on: November 24, 2007, 01:15:41 PM »
a kinetic, non-warheaded torpedo might recreate an iceberg strike?

That would create a hole rather than a tear.

an example would be this. a bullet leaves a clean hole in the skin (if you disregard the exit wound) whereas taking serrated knife to the skin leaves it torn and uneven. am i making any sense with this?

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #15 on: November 24, 2007, 01:43:03 PM »
a kinetic, non-warheaded torpedo might recreate an iceberg strike?

That would create a hole rather than a tear.

an example would be this. a bullet leaves a clean hole in the skin (if you disregard the exit wound) whereas taking serrated knife to the skin leaves it torn and uneven. am i making any sense with this?

I'm sure its really hard for some of the brightest engineers in the world to create a device that would create an iceberg like tear.
If you can't arge both sitdes, you undrstad neeither

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #16 on: November 24, 2007, 02:11:06 PM »
Torpedo damage would show scorch damage and explosive. an iceburg would tear a hole.

a kinetic, non-warheaded torpedo might recreate an iceberg strike?

That would create a hole rather than a tear.

LOL


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Chris Spaghetti

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 12631
  • +0/-4
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #17 on: November 24, 2007, 03:15:05 PM »
Apparently the hole in the Explorer was 5cm, don't know how true that is, though

?

eric bloedow

Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #18 on: November 25, 2007, 09:07:46 AM »
so "the conspiracy" supposedly has soldiers stationed around the edge or "ice wall" keeping people away. so have you ever heard stories like these:

"antarctic expedition vanishes without a trace! families are stunned by government's refusal to send rescue mission!"

"antarctic expedition forced to return by mysterious sniper shooting at them from the top of a glacier!"

but we NEVER hear anything like that, do we? instead we hear TV interviews with people living peacefully at the south pole for months at a time.

oh, right; FErs think "the conspiracy" has total control of the media too!
i've said this before, but i'll say it again: just HOW would this conspiracy TAKE control without anyone NOTICING in the FIRST PLACE?!?!

?

SparteX

  • 411
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #19 on: November 25, 2007, 10:12:52 AM »
a kinetic, non-warheaded torpedo might recreate an iceberg strike?

That would create a hole rather than a tear.

an example would be this. a bullet leaves a clean hole in the skin (if you disregard the exit wound) whereas taking serrated knife to the skin leaves it torn and uneven. am i making any sense with this?

I'm sure its really hard for some of the brightest engineers in the world to create a device that would create an iceberg like tear.
Yes actually since for a torpedo to immitate an iceburg it would have to be just as large and unmovable

*

Gabe

  • 485
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #20 on: November 25, 2007, 01:54:37 PM »
The world's brightest engineers designed the ultimate iceberg effect like weapon: Giant bolder flinging machiiiine! (Boulder is made of ice; batteries not included)
Quote from: Tom Bishop
There is no evidence for an infinite Earth.
Quote from: Tom Bishop
The Earth is infinite.
Warning, you have just lowered your IQ by reading my sig.

*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #21 on: November 25, 2007, 02:52:57 PM »
Point taken
If you can't arge both sitdes, you undrstad neeither

*

Jack

  • Administrator
  • 5180
  • +2/-6
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #22 on: November 25, 2007, 09:08:39 PM »
Sweet, finally a thread debating about weapons.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #23 on: November 25, 2007, 09:14:18 PM »
Quote
so "the conspiracy" supposedly has soldiers stationed around the edge or "ice wall" keeping people away. so have you ever heard stories like these:

"antarctic expedition vanishes without a trace! families are stunned by government's refusal to send rescue mission!"

Actually, since the turn of the 20th century, it wasn't uncommon for Antarctic explorers to turn up dead or missing.

Robert F. Scott, for example, was murdered while exploring Antarctica.

Evidence suggests that the heroic Scott of the Antarctic reached the Ice Wall and was subsequently murdered before returning to civilization.
« Last Edit: November 25, 2007, 09:24:15 PM by Tom Bishop »

?

Cacophony

  • 12
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #24 on: November 25, 2007, 10:19:07 PM »
man, you guys are so full of shit with this conspiracy nonsense. get a goddamn life and quit all of this blabbering on about conspiracies and shit. since the earth has been proven to not be flat, and since never have all of the governments of the world agree with eachother on anything, drag your asses out of the goddamn dark ages and welcome yourselves to the goddamn twenty-first century. fuck you all and do something mother fuckin productive with your goddamn time.

*

Optimus Prime

  • 1147
  • +0/-0
  • Autobot Leader: Keeper of the Matrix of Leadership
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #25 on: November 25, 2007, 11:46:40 PM »
Wow! Although I applaud your enthusiasm, that was still a rather blatant display of poor form in debate. A little fun-poking or name calling is all in fun to be sure, but there's no need to go ballistic over a discussion.

Not to mention, that was an awful lot of energy wasted in trying to prove your point. Makes it easier to brush your views aside if you keep up that sort of image of yourself.

I am what everyone would consider a "Round Earther" myself, but I can't think of any reason to go slamming people for their beliefs. I can argue my beliefs over theirs based on my own experiences and other data I have deemed as having proven results, but going so far beyond that is a bit much!

Dyslexics are teople poo!

*

ﮎingulaЯiτy

  • Arbitrator
  • 9054
  • +0/-0
  • Resident atheist.
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #26 on: November 26, 2007, 04:41:19 AM »
Quote
so "the conspiracy" supposedly has soldiers stationed around the edge or "ice wall" keeping people away. so have you ever heard stories like these:

"antarctic expedition vanishes without a trace! families are stunned by government's refusal to send rescue mission!"

Actually, since the turn of the 20th century, it wasn't uncommon for Antarctic explorers to turn up dead or missing.

Robert F. Scott, for example, was murdered while exploring Antarctica.

Evidence suggests that the heroic Scott of the Antarctic reached the Ice Wall and was subsequently murdered before returning to civilization.

What evidence was that?
How many people exploring antartica weren't 'murdered'?  ::)
If I was asked to imagine a perfect deity, I would never invent one that suffers from a multiple personality disorder. Christians get points for originality there.

?

Ladon

  • 128
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #27 on: November 26, 2007, 05:04:42 AM »
Yes. This is proof that anything named MS Explorer sucks at doing anything. It didn't even tip over properly...

?

Spec138

  • 109
  • +0/-0
  • To FE or not to FE...
Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #28 on: November 26, 2007, 06:14:49 AM »
Yes. This is proof that anything named MS Explorer sucks at doing anything. It didn't even tip over properly...

It obviously stopped Responding :P

?

eric bloedow

Re: The conspiracy at work?
« Reply #29 on: November 26, 2007, 02:35:48 PM »
exactly what evidence? or is that just another rumor you claim MUST be fact JUST because you think it "proves" your argument?