« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?

  • 110 Replies
  • 25647 Views
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #30 on: October 22, 2007, 04:09:28 AM »
Quote from: divito the fascist on October 20, 2007, 03:48:52 AM
I'm assuming the OP is asking about variations of g at different altitudes?

If so, it's not known right now. Tom speculates that the celestial bodies have gravitation that causes g to be less when higher up.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #31 on: October 22, 2007, 04:13:24 AM »
But The Engineer saiys that celestial bodies are affected by the UA.

So you now have countering theories.
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
?

Riles

  • 315
  • +0/-0
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #32 on: October 22, 2007, 04:19:55 AM »
Quote from: Riles on October 21, 2007, 03:15:35 PM
Quote from: divito the fascist on October 21, 2007, 09:56:35 AM

"I'm assuming the OP is asking about variations of g at different altitudes?

If so, it's not known right now. Tom speculates that the celestial bodies have gravitation that causes g to be less when higher up."

Trouble is Divito there are several problems with that speculation.
a) If the variance was due to celestial bodies the variance would be localized to their position above us not directly proportional to altitude from Center of gravity of the Earth.
b) A UA  is influencing the celestial bodies also, if they have a gravitational attraction to  the Earth they would be experiencing an "unbalanced force" and so their displacement from Earth would be reducing.
c) The path objects free fall in has been shown to converge to the COG of the Earth, in FE theory they should be parallel.Celestial being position specific would not have that net effect.
Logged
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #33 on: October 22, 2007, 04:24:57 AM »
Quote from: Z-To-Impress on October 22, 2007, 04:13:24 AM
But The Engineer saiys that celestial bodies are affected by the UA.

So you now have countering theories.

There are many little variations in regards to certain things.

Quote from: Riles on October 22, 2007, 04:19:55 AM
Trouble is Divito there are several problems with that speculation.

I read it. I don't necessarily support Tom's position, was just giving them an idea.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

Riles

  • 315
  • +0/-0
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #34 on: October 22, 2007, 04:26:11 AM »
Oh, I see
Logged
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #35 on: October 22, 2007, 04:56:47 AM »
Quote from: divito the fascist on October 22, 2007, 04:24:57 AM
Quote from: Z-To-Impress on October 22, 2007, 04:13:24 AM
But The Engineer saiys that celestial bodies are affected by the UA.

So you now have countering theories.

There are many little variations in regards to certain things.

Quote from: Riles on October 22, 2007, 04:19:55 AM
Trouble is Divito there are several problems with that speculation.

I read it. I don't necessarily support Tom's position, was just giving them an idea.

Am i take it to mean that there is no "official" view on this particular problem then?
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #36 on: October 22, 2007, 05:00:03 AM »
Quote from: Z-To-Impress on October 22, 2007, 04:56:47 AM
Am i take it to mean that there is no "official" view on this particular problem then?

Dogplatter may have a view of his own like Tom, but I don't think I've seen anything that's been coined as actually plausible just yet.
Logged
Quote from: Proleg on April 22, 2009, 08:50:08 AM
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #37 on: October 22, 2007, 05:09:14 AM »
OK then.
Maybe I'll come up with a good theory.
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?
« Reply #38 on: October 22, 2007, 06:58:49 AM »
The "Firmament" is in fact the event horizon of an inverted black hole, inside which our local universe exists. The light of stars is in fact molecules caught at the event horizon, which have been superheated and is giving off light. The singularity exists outside the event horizon, and us inside it. As you increase in altitude, you get closer to the event horizon so it's gravity increases, countering the UA.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65235
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?
« Reply #39 on: October 22, 2007, 07:03:39 AM »
I agree
Logged
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?
« Reply #40 on: October 22, 2007, 07:06:15 AM »
Then it is settled, another win for FE!
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?
« Reply #41 on: October 22, 2007, 07:10:43 AM »
The inverted black hole is also why NASA never went into space, they did not know how far away it is, and if a spaceship were to get too close it would be pulled in and never seen again.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65235
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?
« Reply #42 on: October 22, 2007, 07:12:48 AM »
Quote from: Hypnobishop on October 22, 2007, 07:06:15 AM
Then it is settled, another win for FE!

;D
Logged
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?
?

afiq980

  • 37
  • +0/-0
  • Earth is round.
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #43 on: October 25, 2007, 12:03:22 AM »
Quote from: Monsieur Bishope on October 22, 2007, 06:58:49 AM
The "Firmament" is in fact the event horizon of an inverted black hole, inside which our local universe exists. The light of stars is in fact molecules caught at the event horizon, which have been superheated and is giving off light. The singularity exists outside the event horizon, and us inside it. As you increase in altitude, you get closer to the event horizon so it's gravity increases, countering the UA.


Alright, then how would you explain why different places on Earth have different Gravitational Acceleration, or what you FE call, "UA", even though they have the same altitude? This is called "local gravitational acceleration".

We RE-ers know that the Gravitational acceleration fluctuates depending on where you are standing, this is because factors such as the density of rocks causes the gravitational pull on that area to weaken and this is already proven. Eg. Chicago have "GA" or "UA" of 9.803 m/sē while Singapore have "GA" or "UA" of    9.781 m/sē.

If the Universal Acceleration theory is put into place, this will not be true, since in UA, it doesnt matter on the topography or the geology of the area, because the "Dark Matter" will still accelerate them "upwards" at about 9.8 m/sē.
Logged
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #44 on: October 25, 2007, 05:42:33 AM »
The stars have a slight gravitational pull.
Logged
If yu can't argue both siiddes, yyou understand neither
*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
  • +1/-0
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #45 on: October 25, 2007, 05:08:28 PM »
Gravity doesn't exist. The stars do not exert ANY gravitational pull.

SWEFES testing has so far confirmed that Universal Acceleration is invariable by location and by altitude, though continual investigation is still going on.
Logged
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901
?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #46 on: October 25, 2007, 05:37:00 PM »
Quote from: Dogplatter on October 25, 2007, 05:08:28 PM
Gravity doesn't exist. The stars do not exert ANY gravitational pull.

SWEFES testing has so far confirmed that Universal Acceleration is invariable by location and by altitude, though continual investigation is still going on.
Well, gravity apparently is variable. It is lower at high altitudes and near the equator. Got an explanation?
Logged
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18033
  • +6/-9
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #47 on: October 25, 2007, 08:46:05 PM »
Quote from: Captain Alitus on October 25, 2007, 05:37:00 PM
Quote from: Dogplatter on October 25, 2007, 05:08:28 PM
Gravity doesn't exist. The stars do not exert ANY gravitational pull.

SWEFES testing has so far confirmed that Universal Acceleration is invariable by location and by altitude, though continual investigation is still going on.
Well, gravity apparently is variable. It is lower at high altitudes and near the equator. Got an explanation?

Dogplatter's sect of the Flat Earth Society attributes those readings to experimental error.
Logged
?

Loard Z

  • 4680
  • +0/-0
  • Insert witty intellectual phrase here...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #48 on: October 25, 2007, 09:12:49 PM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on October 25, 2007, 08:46:05 PM
Quote from: Captain Alitus on October 25, 2007, 05:37:00 PM
Quote from: Dogplatter on October 25, 2007, 05:08:28 PM
Gravity doesn't exist. The stars do not exert ANY gravitational pull.

SWEFES testing has so far confirmed that Universal Acceleration is invariable by location and by altitude, though continual investigation is still going on.
Well, gravity apparently is variable. It is lower at high altitudes and near the equator. Got an explanation?

Dogplatter's sect of the Flat Earth Society attributes those readings to experimental error.

you're such a troll....
Logged
Quote from: eric bloedow on January 08, 2008, 04:03:12 PM
if i remember, austria is an old, dis-used name for what is now Germany.
See My Greatness
?

Riles

  • 315
  • +0/-0
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #49 on: October 26, 2007, 01:30:37 AM »
Quote from: Dogplatter on October 25, 2007, 05:08:28 PM
Gravity doesn't exist. The stars do not exert ANY gravitational pull.

SWEFES testing has so far confirmed that Universal Acceleration is invariable by location and by altitude, though continual investigation is still going on.

Who is SWEFES  Dogplatter?
Logged
?

Riles

  • 315
  • +0/-0
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #50 on: October 26, 2007, 01:54:36 AM »
Quote from: Dogplatter on October 25, 2007, 05:08:28 PM
Gravity doesn't exist. The stars do not exert ANY gravitational pull.

SWEFES testing has so far confirmed that Universal Acceleration is invariable by location and by altitude, though continual investigation is still going on.

Gravity variation has been accurately mapped across the whole globe for over 20 years
Logged
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?
« Reply #51 on: October 26, 2007, 04:01:45 AM »
Those maps were faked by the conpsiracy. You have been fooled. Do not allow it, rise up and destroy the authority!
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

afiq980

  • 37
  • +0/-0
  • Earth is round.
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #52 on: October 26, 2007, 05:06:28 AM »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on October 25, 2007, 08:46:05 PM
Quote from: Captain Alitus on October 25, 2007, 05:37:00 PM
Quote from: Dogplatter on October 25, 2007, 05:08:28 PM
Gravity doesn't exist. The stars do not exert ANY gravitational pull.

SWEFES testing has so far confirmed that Universal Acceleration is invariable by location and by altitude, though continual investigation is still going on.
Well, gravity apparently is variable. It is lower at high altitudes and near the equator. Got an explanation?

Dogplatter's sect of the Flat Earth Society attributes those readings to experimental error.

Dipshit, give the reasons why. Dont just say "experimental error".

You FE's always uses such lousy excuses when you lose a battle.

Examples:

"It is a conspiracy"
"It is fake"
"It is experimental error"
Logged
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?
« Reply #53 on: October 26, 2007, 05:07:37 AM »
Yep. Beautiful system, ain't it?
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
*

Username

  • President of The Flat Earth Society
  • Administrator
  • 18223
  • +41/-82
  • Most Accurate Scientist Ever
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #54 on: October 26, 2007, 11:49:31 AM »
As I said, the heavens have a slight gravitational pull.
Logged
If yu can't argue both siiddes, yyou understand neither
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?
« Reply #55 on: October 26, 2007, 12:33:52 PM »
Quote from: Username on October 26, 2007, 11:49:31 AM
As I said, the heavens have a slight gravitational pull.

Problem solved.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

ChiefConspirator

  • 102
  • +0/-0
  • Tom Bishop - A Life
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #56 on: October 26, 2007, 03:48:22 PM »
Quote from: Username on October 26, 2007, 11:49:31 AM
As I said, the heavens have a slight gravitational pull.

That's interesting. So the UA must then affect the Earth and the heavens differently. Since the heavens are being pulled slightly toward the Earth, the UA must be stronger on them to counter act that. Or am I wrong?

Edit: I am wrong. The UA doesn't need to be stronger, it needs to accelerate slightly faster to counteract that force.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2007, 03:49:53 PM by ChiefConspirator »
Logged
Quote from: Tom Bishop on October 18, 2007, 11:25:02 AM
I've never seen any round earth. Why should I believe in something I've never seen?
?

Conspiracy Mastermind

  • 1836
  • +0/-0
  • There is no conspiracy...
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be same?
« Reply #57 on: October 26, 2007, 03:51:17 PM »
Err, you're wrong because, err, erm, because the firmament, er, is attatched, err, by unknown, er, means to the plane of the earth, err, so the UA pushes on the earth, which pushes on the firmament, err, which stops the stars' gravitation, err, doing whatever you said. Yeah, that'll do.
Logged
Quote from: Tomcooper84
there is no optical light, there is just light and theres no other type of light unless you start talkling about energy saving lightbulbs compared to other types of light bulbs
ENaG: Evidence Not a Guarantee.
?

Riles

  • 315
  • +0/-0
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #58 on: October 26, 2007, 04:30:58 PM »
Quote from: Username on October 26, 2007, 11:49:31 AM
As I said, the heavens have a slight gravitational pull.

No chance of research details, peer reviewing, predictive results, compliance with observations or specific formulas I suppose?
Logged
?

Captain Alitus

  • 151
  • +0/-0
  • Lord of the Lizard People
Re: Why are the "UA" of different places different, when theyre supposed to be s
« Reply #59 on: October 26, 2007, 06:38:10 PM »
Quote from: Username on October 26, 2007, 11:49:31 AM
As I said, the heavens have a slight gravitational pull.
Gravity doesn't exist :D
Logged
Quote from: McDonalds Fan
Why is it when I throw a delicious McNugget up in the air it always comes back down into my eagerly awaiting mouth?
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »