For Gulliver

  • 37 Replies
  • 6556 Views
*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
For Gulliver
« on: August 13, 2007, 05:37:56 PM »
http://feeds.wired.com/~r/wired/topheadlines/~3/143697248/DARK_MATTER_HUNT

Might want to tell them that you already have pictures of it.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2007, 05:42:39 PM »
Maybe they will even give him a Nobel Prize!


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2007, 05:45:58 PM »
rofl!  :D
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2007, 05:50:48 PM »
I wouldn't mind a Nobel Prize. Do they make one for being really, really, ridiculously good-looking??
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2007, 05:59:40 PM »
How would that get you one?







 :D


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2007, 06:05:40 PM »
How would that get you one?







 :D

Well played, but that may affect your rating.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

Marinade

  • 406
  • +0/-0
  • FE is for laughing at... not with.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #6 on: August 13, 2007, 10:16:03 PM »
I wouldn't mind a Nobel Prize. Do they make one for being really, really, ridiculously good-looking??

But only Derek Zoolander can get that one then.  :(
Haha Tom is so funny. He can't be serious, no one is that stubborn or dumb.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #7 on: August 13, 2007, 10:45:31 PM »
Well, TomG?  Why are you holding up scientific progress?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #8 on: August 14, 2007, 12:07:56 AM »
Well, TomG?  Why are you holding up scientific progress?

I think he might be preparing his acceptance speech.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #9 on: August 14, 2007, 12:10:24 AM »
Right.  ::)
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #10 on: August 14, 2007, 03:36:08 AM »
Brilliant ;D
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #11 on: August 14, 2007, 01:52:37 PM »
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #12 on: August 14, 2007, 02:49:32 PM »
Might want to tell them that you already have pictures of it.

I'd say, that's some huge bucks they're spending.

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #13 on: August 16, 2007, 10:03:29 AM »
Dark matter was mentioned, and I thought of how Gulliver hasn't visited this thread, yet.  So, come Gulliver, we (or at least I) await your response.

Dam, I feel like one of those annoying bump-something-400-times-waiting-for-a-response-from-Tom kids.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #14 on: August 16, 2007, 10:06:16 AM »
TomB regularly lies. Please ignore any representations he makes without complete evidence. We've challenged him, for example, to document his "derived experiment", replete with a monetary incentive.
I'm going to use TomG's own words against him.  Just change TomB to TomG, derived experiment to pictures of dark matter, and monetary to Nobel Prize.

How ironic for him.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2007, 08:07:32 AM »
This brings joy to my heart ;D
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #16 on: August 18, 2007, 11:20:12 AM »
* divito begins playing final Jeopardy music.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

Marinade

  • 406
  • +0/-0
  • FE is for laughing at... not with.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #17 on: August 18, 2007, 11:35:37 AM »
*Marinade hums along.
Haha Tom is so funny. He can't be serious, no one is that stubborn or dumb.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #18 on: August 18, 2007, 11:47:18 AM »
Raist drunkenly yells what he thinks are the words.

"I don't wanna wait for my lifes to be over. It tastes good on a bun.....g.....mumble cheese"

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #19 on: August 20, 2007, 07:36:59 AM »
Is Gully really not gonna respond to this thread? I'm disappointed
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

The Communist

  • 1217
  • +0/-0
  • Paranoid Intellectual & Pedantic Twat
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #20 on: August 20, 2007, 09:32:15 AM »
I should share the Nobel Prize as well since I posted some pictures of dark matter too.
On FES, you attack a strawman. In Soviet Russia, the strawman attacks you
-JackASCII

Do you have any outlandish claims to back up your evidence?
-Raist

Quote from: GeneralGayer date=1190908626
Yeah I love gay porn.

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #21 on: August 20, 2007, 09:35:49 AM »
I should share the Nobel Prize as well since I posted some pictures of dark matter too.

Then this is that time where you go on about your scientific finds, to show up, or get shot down.

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #22 on: August 20, 2007, 06:06:31 PM »
I wonder why Gulliver will not read this thread and reply? Well, we all KNOW he reads it, but still...
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

?

Ferdinand Magellen

  • 651
  • +0/-0
  • REALLY now....
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #23 on: August 20, 2007, 06:16:11 PM »
He doesn't reply because the thread is pointless. You make an attack against him, not against RE. It doesn't deserve a reply.
Ignoring the truth does not make it go away, it just makes you ignorant and disempowered.

Can you change reality by inventing new names for ordinary things?

*

divito the truthist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 6901
  • +0/-0
  • Relativist, Existentialist, Nihilist
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #24 on: August 20, 2007, 06:36:21 PM »
He doesn't reply because the thread is pointless. You make an attack against him, not against RE. It doesn't deserve a reply.

It's not pointless. I posted it so he could admit he was wrong, just like how he does it to everyone else. I'm very worried that he can't admit such an obvious thing, and I'm surprised you support this evasiveness. Everyone one of us here, except maybe TE or sokarul has admitted when they've been mistaken or incorrect at one point or another. He should be able to do the same.
Our existentialist, relativist, nihilist, determinist, fascist, eugenicist moderator hath returned.
Quote from: Fortuna
objectively good

?

Ferdinand Magellen

  • 651
  • +0/-0
  • REALLY now....
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #25 on: August 20, 2007, 06:37:26 PM »
I wasn't here for the infamous post; I had thought he had already admitted his error.
Ignoring the truth does not make it go away, it just makes you ignorant and disempowered.

Can you change reality by inventing new names for ordinary things?

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #26 on: August 20, 2007, 06:41:13 PM »
He doesn't reply because the thread is pointless. You make an attack against him, not against RE. It doesn't deserve a reply.

I have attacked no one, genius. I simply pointed out his refusal to acknowledge a sound rebuttal that has no holes in it.

Your defense of a nonperson (in my eyes, Gulliver is just another Tom Bishop) has nothing to do with me, and everything to do with derailing from the sad fact that when push comes to shove, the boy cannot back up his statements with a response.
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

?

Ferdinand Magellen

  • 651
  • +0/-0
  • REALLY now....
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #27 on: August 21, 2007, 05:34:46 AM »
I wasn't here for the infamous post; I had thought he had already admitted his error.

I already apologized and adimited my error, midnight.
Ignoring the truth does not make it go away, it just makes you ignorant and disempowered.

Can you change reality by inventing new names for ordinary things?

?

The Communist

  • 1217
  • +0/-0
  • Paranoid Intellectual & Pedantic Twat
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #28 on: August 21, 2007, 07:27:07 AM »
He doesn't reply because the thread is pointless. You make an attack against him, not against RE. It doesn't deserve a reply.

It's not pointless. I posted it so he could admit he was wrong, just like how he does it to everyone else. I'm very worried that he can't admit such an obvious thing, and I'm surprised you support this evasiveness. Everyone one of us here, except maybe TE or sokarul has admitted when they've been mistaken or incorrect at one point or another. He should be able to do the same.

HIs pictures might show dark matter.  Just because its not detected now or seen doesn't mean its there.
On FES, you attack a strawman. In Soviet Russia, the strawman attacks you
-JackASCII

Do you have any outlandish claims to back up your evidence?
-Raist

Quote from: GeneralGayer date=1190908626
Yeah I love gay porn.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30499
  • +0/-0
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: For Gulliver
« Reply #29 on: August 21, 2007, 07:30:16 AM »
When people referred to him saying he had pics of dark matter, i assumed he was being sarcastic. Like that he had pics, and there was dark matter in them, you just were unable to see it yourself.