equivalence of orbit.

  • 1 Replies
  • 1897 Views
?

RESOCR

  • 416
  • +0/-0
  • I argue for stress relief!
equivalence of orbit.
« on: March 11, 2007, 01:33:12 PM »
Why cant NASA just put a space station above the earth, and send refueling flights under the guise of 'Maintenance Missions'? For all FE knows of their own theory, that could be what they do.Keep shipping up more fuel to keep it above the earth.


And if the earth is accelerating, and the sun and moon above it, what is stopping acceleration from catching a space station?
Quote from: ice wall gard 469320
Quote from: Tom Bishop
Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude
And so does your theory

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: equivalence of orbit.
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2007, 01:01:41 PM »
Why cant NASA just put a space station above the earth, and send refueling flights under the guise of 'Maintenance Missions'? For all FE knows of their own theory, that could be what they do.Keep shipping up more fuel to keep it above the earth.
So you're saying a government that wants to keep the idea of a flat earth a secret, would spend millions of dollars daily in order to keep a chunk of metal accelerating upwards for no purpose other than to risk compromising their conspiracy?

And if the earth is accelerating, and the sun and moon above it, what is stopping acceleration from catching a space station?
The international space station (which is actually a Boeing 747) is not a celestial body or earth.