If that is the case, then why did his limits stop at Jupiter? I thought RE'ers claim that we can see much farther than Jupiter?
We can. The human eye can perceive things millions of kilometres distant from earth. Did you not know that?
Why do you regurgitate fallacies when I asked a simple question? Straw-man much?
Are you now claiming that with your unaided eye, you cannot see the moon or the sun or Jupiter? You should see an ophthalmologist post haste my friend if that's truly the case.
lol, you do realize that the sun and moon are closer than Jupiter, right? I asked why Jupiter was the limit. If you don't have an answer, then don't try to move the goal posts, please.
First off, Newton Man said Pluto not Jupiter. Second he never used the word limit, nor implied it. So why are you assuming that Jupiter [sic] is being proposed as a limit rather than an arbitrary range used to illustrate his point, that there is a preponderance of photographic evidence of distant celestial bodies?