alignment of megalithic sites across the world

Hey guys,

I just watched a great documentary called "Revelation of the Pyramids". In this documentary they show how the following megalithic sites around the globe line up.  When you plot it in the globe earth (googlemaps) it comes up as an arc.

I was wondering how these sites would line up on the flat earth map?  I have a feeling they would align perfectly on the flat earth map.
the documentary states that you can draw a line starting from easter island, travel through all of these sites and then end up back at easter island.

Easter Island
Paracas Peru
Nasca (famous Nasca Lines of Peru)
Machu Picchu
Ollantaytambo
Cusco Peru
Paratori Pyramids
Tasili N'ajier
Siwa
Great Pyramid of GIza
Ur (Iraq where Abraham was born)
Persepolis Iran
Mohenjo Daro Pakistan
Khajuraho India
Pyay Burma
Sukhothai Thailand
Angkor Wat Cambodia
Prevhiear
Back to Easter Island

Cherry picking sites will let any sensationalist doc film maker who wants to make a couple of dishonest bucks construct any pattern and hence theory they wish. I live in Scotland do you know how many prehistoric sites there are here on what is a pretty small country......hundreds. The problem is people love to believe any old crap as long as it has a good/ mediocre story hook.

It's only 9 seconds . . .


" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I cannot figure out how, on any one map, these various "holy sites" would end up on one straight line or even on a few straight lines. 

The talk about the line-up of these sites is nonsense.

I cannot figure out how, on any one map, these various "holy sites" would end up on one straight line or even on a few straight lines. 

The talk about the line-up of these sites is nonsense.

Hello.....I don't think you are listening.....there are thousand and thousands of 'religious' and pre history sites dotted across the globe. Where I live for example there are over 1500 prehistoric hill fort sites alone within a radius of 175miles. I could draw any number of straight lines through a whole bunch of these hill forts that would prove nothing!

https://hillforts.arch.ox.ac.uk

I can't believe no one has posted this yet:

I can't believe no one has posted this yet:

Nor can I as it's pretty funny!

That's a random sample of sites built at completely different times, some as recent as 500 years ago. I could pick a different random sample of old monuments to form a triangle.

So why is that even a thing?

A triangle consisting of as many waypoints, covering as large an area?

Go on then........

Hey guys,

I just watched a great documentary called "Revelation of the Pyramids". In this documentary they show how the following megalithic sites around the globe line up.  When you plot it in the globe earth (googlemaps) it comes up as an arc.

I was wondering how these sites would line up on the flat earth map?  I have a feeling they would align perfectly on the flat earth map.
the documentary states that you can draw a line starting from easter island, travel through all of these sites and then end up back at easter island.

Easter Island
Paracas Peru
Nasca (famous Nasca Lines of Peru)
Machu Picchu
Ollantaytambo
Cusco Peru
Paratori Pyramids
Tasili N'ajier
Siwa
Great Pyramid of GIza
Ur (Iraq where Abraham was born)
Persepolis Iran
Mohenjo Daro Pakistan
Khajuraho India
Pyay Burma
Sukhothai Thailand
Angkor Wat Cambodia
Prevhiear
Back to Easter Island

Thanks for this post, i´ve been serching for this, and it seems you are the only one to mix both theories: flat earth and this alignment

Do you have any further conclusions about this? have you tried to make them in alignment using the flat earth map? or it would be impossible?

in any case, i strongly believe this constructions were made by the same people, the atlanteans.

If you want to research it together, please contact me in facebook: erik von behr - from brasilia, brasil.

cheers

It might be kind of like the Bermuda Triangle. There are actually just as many missing craft concentrated outside the triangle as inside the triangle. I
 seriously doubt any of the makers of the monuments even knew the others existed. Although each of those cultures were very aware of the solstices, rising and setting of the moon and various other astronomical events. Their cultures were agrarian focused and depended on knowing the seasons. I would think this would definitely be common to most cultures no matter where they were located. Most of us don’t depend on knowing the seasons and best times to plant and harvest to survive.

...and when dialing back time 12,500 years the great sphynx faces the Leo constellation precisely.  Modern archaeology dates the sphynx back roughly 4500 years correct? At that time the sphynx would have been facing the Taurus constellation.

Moving right past the origin of the Zodiac constellations and how they would or would not fit into your timeline, explain how the Sphinx "faces" any constellation.  Every star (except Polaris) moves throughout the night, and actually rises and sets at different times (with the exception of stars that don't set, but none of these stars are on the ecliptic where we find zodiac constellations).  Does the sphinx actually change position during the night?  Is it on a rotating pedestal of which I was unaware.  Does this pedestal also shift the sphinx's position on a daily basis to face these stars?  Is what you typed here just regurgitated nonsense that you didn't even take the few minutes you would have needed to fact check it into oblivion?

Here's some good advice from someone to whom I hope you will listen to avoid sounding silly and foolish in the future.

Again, the key here is to do your OWN research, and all you keep doing is reciting the works of others......  Some day you'll learn to not do that, it just makes you sound silly and foolish at the end of the tunnel