You refuse to entertain any possible scenario that doesn't fit your view of the world, correct?
I feel that there is no reason to entertain imaginary unobserved world-models beyond human experience.
That "just because you can't see it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist" argument sounds like some lame justification for the existence of ghosts or an omnipotent fairy in the sky who grants wishes.
The problem with that argument Tom is that conversely, just because you
can see something, doesn't mean it exists. An example would be a mirage on the horizon, or an hallucination,
You have elected to rely on vision and perception as one chosen source of evidence. This is called "putting all your eggs in one basket".
Do you not believe that Atoms and Molecules exist?