Trip to Antarctica.

  • 261 Replies
  • 54537 Views
*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17962
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #240 on: September 09, 2008, 11:42:40 PM »
Quote
Again, you didn't answer my question. You sidestepped.
What will be thought of their account???????????

What do others believe will be observed? The trip is from Dec 10-30 or thereabouts.

There will be nothing wrong or contradicting to FET with their account because their account will be that they didn't observer a perpetual midnight sun.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2008, 11:44:57 PM by Tom Bishop »

?

dyno

  • 562
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #241 on: September 09, 2008, 11:51:14 PM »
And if they come back and say the Sun was up the whole time?? You will say what?

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17962
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #242 on: September 10, 2008, 01:19:19 AM »
That won't happen, so I won't need to say anything.

?

dyno

  • 562
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #243 on: September 10, 2008, 01:23:56 AM »
You refuse to entertain any possible scenario that doesn't fit your view of the world, correct?

*

Moon squirter

  • 1405
  • Ding dong!
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #244 on: September 10, 2008, 02:41:19 AM »
You refuse to entertain any possible scenario that doesn't fit your view of the world, correct?

Tom's FE "window" is unbreakable.  The entire Cosmos has been flattened, stars and galaxies have been crushed and General Relativity has been broken.  Never underestimate the power of Monsieur Bishop.


I haven't performed it and I've never claimed to. I've have trouble being in two places at the same time.

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 17962
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #245 on: September 10, 2008, 04:36:54 AM »
You refuse to entertain any possible scenario that doesn't fit your view of the world, correct?

I feel that there is no reason to entertain imaginary unobserved world-models beyond human experience.

That "just because you can't see it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist" argument sounds like some lame justification for the existence of ghosts or an omnipotent fairy in the sky who grants wishes.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2008, 04:45:04 AM by Tom Bishop »

*

Moon squirter

  • 1405
  • Ding dong!
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #246 on: September 10, 2008, 04:59:25 AM »
You refuse to entertain any possible scenario that doesn't fit your view of the world, correct?

I feel that there is no reason to entertain imaginary unobserved world-models beyond human experience.

That "just because you can't see it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist" argument sounds like some lame justification for the existence of ghosts or an omnipotent fairy in the sky who grants wishes.

The problem with that argument Tom is that conversely, just because you can see something, doesn't mean it exists.  An example would be a mirage on the horizon, or an hallucination,

You have elected to rely on vision and perception as one chosen source of evidence.  This is called "putting all your eggs in one basket".

Do you not believe that Atoms and Molecules exist?

I haven't performed it and I've never claimed to. I've have trouble being in two places at the same time.

?

dyno

  • 562
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #247 on: September 10, 2008, 06:24:17 AM »
I was trying to get him to post what he would say if someone came and said that they have seen, first hand, perpetual daylight at the Antarctic coastline.
He didn't even say he would call them liars. He deliberately avoids solids positions so he can create more magic later when someone does "experience" something contradictory to his beliefs.

How about another FEr then? Anyone? Lets have some input. It's not RE vs TB. Why aren't the rest of you speaking up?

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • The Elder Ones
  • 42617
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #248 on: September 10, 2008, 06:49:07 AM »
... beyond human experience.

You keep saying that.  I don't think it means what you think it means.

[/Indigo Montoya]
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #249 on: September 11, 2008, 09:15:21 AM »
Where I live, the local travel agency offers several packages for expeditions to antarctica, as well as cruises.

If I went on this expedition, what proof would I have to bring back to prove there is no ice wall miles high. (A 150 ft ice wall is not enough to contain the atmosphere, I would have asphyxiated by now).

Also, if there's a massive conspiracy, why do they offer these packages?
I speak with a humble tongue and a kind heart that I may impart peace and love, (Truth).

The North pole is the only place where 6 months of light and darkness can and has been documented because there are people who live there (Inuits), according to science if the Earth spun on her axis this could not take place. The link shows the North axis is tilted away from the Sun in Dec (3/mths), thereby no day-light, and in June towards the Sun (3/mths), thereby no nights, but in the March and Sept position the North axis gets half light/half night (6/mths), under this failed THEORY the Earth is flat.
http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/images/seasons.jpg

But on a flat Earth map when the Sun is closer to the center as in the spring/summer the 6 months light documentation is confirmed and the same during the fall/winter for the 6 months nights, I hope this helped.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v499/dogplatter/flatmap.jpg

The Antarctica trip will only prove that you visited a portion of the Ice Wall.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #250 on: September 11, 2008, 09:16:56 AM »
I speak with a humble tongue and a kind heart that I may impart peace and love, (Truth).

The North pole is the only place where 6 months of light and darkness can and has been documented because there are people who live there (Inuits), according to science if the Earth spun on her axis this could not take place. The link shows the North axis is tilted away from the Sun in Dec (3/mths), thereby no day-light, and in June towards the Sun (3/mths), thereby no nights, but in the March and Sept position the North axis gets half light/half night (6/mths), under this failed THEORY the Earth is flat.
http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/images/seasons.jpg

But on a flat Earth map when the Sun is closer to the center as in the spring/summer the 6 months light documentation is confirmed and the same during the fall/winter for the 6 months nights, I hope this helped.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v499/dogplatter/flatmap.jpg

Please stop posting this. Once should be enough, this is already the third time.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #251 on: September 11, 2008, 09:17:14 AM »
I speak with a humble tongue and a kind heart that I may impart peace and love, (Truth).

Tell you what, why don't you stop making the same post in different threads.

Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #252 on: September 11, 2008, 09:24:18 AM »
Please stop posting this. Once should be enough, this is already the third time.
Because you haven't dispute yet, so I must search for the ONE who can reason this with me, you must never reply again to my post unless you are able to defend an discussion proving otherwise.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #253 on: September 11, 2008, 09:25:15 AM »
Because you haven't dispute yet, so I must search for the ONE who can reason this with me, you must never reply again to my post unless you are able to defend an discussion proving otherwise.

Fine by me. I'll just ban you next time.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #254 on: September 11, 2008, 09:29:19 AM »
Because you haven't dispute yet, so I must search for the ONE who can reason this with me, you must never reply again to my post unless you are able to defend an discussion proving otherwise.

Fine by me. I'll just ban you next time.
Drown the Truth, ban me, but you haven't answered and your only retort on discussion board is to ban the One who can prove the obvious.

*

Parsifal

  • Official Member
  • 36118
  • Bendy Light specialist
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #255 on: September 11, 2008, 09:30:31 AM »
Drown the Truth, ban me, but you haven't answered and your only retort on discussion board is to ban the One who can prove the obvious.

I won't ban you for posting it, only for posting it repeatedly in threads where it is irrelevant. If you really feel it is that important, make a thread for it.
I'm going to side with the white supremacists.

Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #256 on: September 11, 2008, 09:54:08 AM »
Drown the Truth, ban me, but you haven't answered and your only retort on discussion board is to ban the One who can prove the obvious.

I won't ban you for posting it, only for posting it repeatedly in threads where it is irrelevant. If you really feel it is that important, make a thread for it.
Thanks you I will post a thread and shame on you going about like this on 9/11 terrorizing free speech with a username like yours, are you an American or just pretending? SHAMELESS....

Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #257 on: September 11, 2008, 09:56:12 AM »
Thanks you I will post a thread and shame on you going about like this on 9/11 terrorizing free speech with a username like yours, are you an American or just pretending? SHAMELESS....

Actually, he is Australian.

Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #258 on: September 11, 2008, 09:57:46 AM »
Thanks you I will post a thread and shame on you going about like this on 9/11 terrorizing free speech with a username like yours, are you an American or just pretending? SHAMELESS....

Actually, he is Australian.
No difference they serve the commonwealth allies to USA. SHAME....

?

dyno

  • 562
Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #259 on: September 11, 2008, 05:23:42 PM »
Thanks you I will post a thread and shame on you going about like this on 9/11 terrorizing free speech with a username like yours, are you an American or just pretending? SHAMELESS....

Actually, he is Australian.
No difference they serve the commonwealth allies to USA. SHAME....

The Commonwealth does not serve the US. We are allies. But just as the USA is a free country, so is Australia. This means we also have idiots who like to abuse their privileges.

Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #260 on: September 12, 2008, 11:02:56 AM »
http://www.condorjourneys-adventures.com/antarctica_cruise5.asp

That has to be a really fast boat to go around the outer rim of earth in 30 days especially when you have to stop to see the sights from time to time.

Re: Trip to Antarctica.
« Reply #261 on: September 12, 2008, 11:17:10 AM »
http://www.condorjourneys-adventures.com/antarctica_cruise5.asp

That has to be a really fast boat to go around the outer rim of earth in 30 days especially when you have to stop to see the sights from time to time.

Looks like fun.  Expensive though.