Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - SuperHater7810

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
1
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 17, 2013, 02:11:55 PM »
Well even if we dont know exactly what it is. At least we know how it works and it makes sense.
Verry much unlike your air pressure bollox.

2
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: How does weight work on a FE?
« on: August 17, 2013, 02:00:50 PM »
Say you are sitting in the passinger seat of a sports car while holding a bowling ball in your lap
when the car accelerates rappidly you will feel the bowling ball press into your lap. The ball has efectively gotten heavier.
 the same as how jet fighter pilots feel their limbs get heavier when they make high g manouvers.

3
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 05:40:18 PM »
What do you mean?

4
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 05:29:53 PM »
There are two forces at play regarding the earth and moon. Gravity pulling the two towards each other and the centrifugal force of the moon rotating about the earth pulling it away from the earth. These two forces keep the moon in a fairly stable orbit around the earth.
No body rightly knows what causes matter to be atracted to matter. Even thow we have a fair idea of what might. But we know that it does.  And it does a good job of explaining why objects fall to the ground.
 your air pressure thing that your going on about on the other hand doesnt realy explain anything.

5
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 04:55:54 PM »
Quote from: sceptimatic link=topic= 8)59595.msg1527398#msg1527398 date=1376691545
Gravity is what causes weight. You haven't explained yet how air pressure can cause weight. Mabye when you do i might change my mind about gravity.
Ok then, explain what this gravity is. Just tell me what it is and how it makes the weight of an object.
Well for a verry basic expination. Matter attracts matter. The more matter am object contains the greater its atraction to other objects.

6
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 01:06:30 PM »
Gravity is what causes weight. You haven't explained yet how air pressure can cause weight. Mabye when you do i might change my mind about gravity.

7
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 12:54:12 PM »

How can lower pressure cause a net push to be upwards?

You said yourself that atmospheric pressure decreases as you go up and it increases the closer you are to the ground.
If you go back to my example with the kitchen table. THe air underneath the table will have greater pressure than the air above it because it is closer to the ground. even if its just by the tiniest most minuscule amount. but because the the pressure is greater under the table if its going to push it anywhere it will be up.
But it doesn't because the force of gravity on the table is stronger than anything air pressure can do.

8
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 12:42:50 PM »

 I thought common sense would answer that question.
How does this fictional gravity work under an ice dome?

It might cause the ice dome to collapse under its own weight. Even by your own reasoning ice is denser than air so it should inevitably end up below it.

9
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 12:40:23 PM »
  why accept a force that clearly does not exists

But it does exist. Its what causes objects to fall towards the ground.

10
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 12:33:04 PM »

Atmospheric pressure amply explains what happens on earth.

But it cant explain why denser objects are heaver than less dense objects.
Wich is basically why you where trying to explain with it in the first place.

11
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 11:59:50 AM »
What causes objects with more condensed particles to be attracted to the ground stronger than less condensed particles?

12
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 11:46:24 AM »
But why do denser objects tend to be heavier than less dense ones?

13
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 11:22:33 AM »
Quote from: SuperHater
Air is a fluid. Fluid pressure exerts a force equally in all directions against any surface its in contact with.
Imaging an ordinary kitchen table. If its surrounded by air, the air molecules will be exerting the same force against the underside of the table as they will be against the upper side of the table.
No they won't.
The weight of the table exerts it's weight, plus the weight of air pressure onto the floor. The floor resists the pressure, it does not push up, unless there is a force that makes it push up.

For instance:
If a man lays down holding weights, his arms are resisting those weights from crushing him and the floor under his body is resisting the weight of him and the weight, plus the air pressure above.
It's only resistance not push from below, unless by artificial means or by a low V high pressure wind scooping a person or object into the air.

But what causes everything to exert a force downwards. Everything including the man the table the weights and all the air molecules. Why does everything tend to move down towards the ground and never in any other direction.

14
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: How does weight work on a FE?
« on: August 16, 2013, 11:17:59 AM »
The troy weight is used for measuring mass. Its units include the troy ounce and the troy pound.
(Hint: ounce and pound are both units of mass)
A troy ounce is equal to 31.1g
A troy pound is 373.2g

Confusing weight and mass is like confusing distance and time.
You cant have 20 hours in a mile. But you can travel at a speed of 20 miles an hour.
It sounds equally dumb when you confuse mass for weight.

15
Flat Earth Debate / Re: Sceptimatics theory
« on: August 16, 2013, 11:02:14 AM »

[/quote] Air pressure does not push upwards unless it's from artificial means, such as a bomb exploding or a high V low pressure wind.
[/quote]

Air is a fluid. Fluid pressure exerts a force equally in all directions against any surface its in contact with.
Imaging an ordinary kitchen table. If its surrounded by air, the air molecules will be exerting the same force against the underside of the table as they will be against the upper side of the table. 

16
Flat Earth General / Re: What do you think of the Tychonic system
« on: August 11, 2013, 07:20:00 PM »
If the sun is traveling  around the outside of the flat earths rim then why dont australoans see the sun to the south?


17
Flat Earth Debate / Re: "Weightlessness" and faked video evidence
« on: August 10, 2013, 01:50:09 AM »
Your probably too young to remember the high quality of the videos in question: #" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gemini 4 | NASAs First Ever Space Walk - Narrated By Ed White (June 3, 1965)

If you cannot tell that it was filmed un
erwater, I cannot help you.
h
How can you tell it was done under water?

18
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Space Flight
« on: July 06, 2013, 08:29:05 PM »
Rockets cannot slow start like they show us in the videos of the supposed space launches.
Rockets do not start slowly, no matter what they are.
Rockets "do not" start slowly, no matter what.


Why not?

19
Flat Earth General / Re: Gravity is atmosphere v mass/weight.
« on: July 06, 2013, 07:49:04 PM »
What the hell is a warpage of space time. Explain this.

#ws" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Gravity Visualized

But more to the point.
If air pressure is what you think pushes stuff towards the ground. Why does it always push stuff downwards and never upwards or even off to the sides?

20
Flat Earth General / Re: Gravity is atmosphere v mass/weight.
« on: July 03, 2013, 04:38:18 PM »
Hi sceptic. Sorry if you have already explained this back along but.....
From what I understand what you are saying is that the atmosphere is applying some kind of force to everything around us pushing everything to the ground and this is what we see as gravity.
But why does the air push everything down and not up or in any other direction?

21
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Space Flight
« on: June 18, 2013, 07:59:52 AM »
SO how do i get 85.3 PSI out of the atmosphere if there is only 14.7 psi to begin with. Who doesn't understand how air pressure works now?

22
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Space Flight
« on: June 18, 2013, 07:53:11 AM »
Ok...deep breaths scepti.   :)

Let's take your large truck and 100 psi.
What you have done, is took 85.3 psi from the atmosphere and pumped it into the trucks tyre.
The atmosphere has to fill that gap from the top,Which immediately evens up the pressure against the tyre and stops it getting blown out.
Only the tyre wall itself if handling the stresses which it's designed to do.

If you over inflate it, you are then pulling more air from the atmosphere to do that, which means the atmosphere will drop down to equalize it, until that tyre bursts with one last pump or someone adding weight to it, like a bloke getting into the cab or a load being put on the trucks back, which compressed the tyre  and bang.

Ok so before I started inflating the tire the pressure of the earth atmosphere atmosphere was at 100 PSI.....? OK. ???
BUt even by your EXTREMELY flawed logic. Honestly I dont even know where to begin. If we are decreasing the atmospheric pressure as we are increasing the pressure inside the tire surely that should put even more strain on the wall of the tire.

23
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Space Flight
« on: June 18, 2013, 07:34:57 AM »
Near perfect is not perfect.
Evacuate more air and your light bulb needs hoovering up.

There is no such thing as a perfect vacuum. Not even in outer space.
And also as people here have already have tried to explain. Is there is plenty more situations right here on earth where we get pressures far greater than they have to deal with in the vacuum of space.
THink about it.  If you have 15 PSI inside your space craft and 0 outside, that means there is only a difference of 15 psi.
But if you take a large truck tire that holds up to 100 psi and you have an atmospheric pressure pressure of 14.7 that gives you a pressure difference of  85.3 psi.
So there is much greater load on the wall of the truck tire than on the hull of your space craft.

24
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Space Flight
« on: June 17, 2013, 08:10:42 AM »


 The reason I used this example , if you can see past what I'm about to say, which I won;t hold my breath about...is:
The water molecules, in that dense air, turn to gas and expand inside the tin...but outside the tin, is a raging fire, which is consuming all of the oxygen and creating a partial vacuum around it, meaning there is very little air pushing against the outside of the can, which means that the longer the fire burns...the more that the can expands...blowing off the top, or the weakest point.

Picture the fire around the can...as the vacuum of space...
Note: I know space isn't fire....I'm saying, picture the fire around the can, as the consumption of air, as in a vacuum and you should see why a rocket would not work in a vacuum...but I know you won't.

Oh...and I didn't answer the other parts, because it was starting to get tedious.

Well the fire wouldn't create much of a vacuum. Any gas that it consumed would just be replaced by gasses from other parts of the room. But i can see that that's sort of besides the point.
If we where to weld the lid of the tin in place or find some other way to securely fasten it in place, we could make the tin stand up to the differences in pressure. and the lid would likely stay firmly in place.
Just like how they design space craft to stand up to the differences of pressure in space.

25
Flat Earth Q&A / Re: Space Flight
« on: June 17, 2013, 03:29:22 AM »
The air inside the can gets hot, expands so the presdure invreases.
It wants to escape to an aria of lower pressure. The lid is blown off as
The gas rsvapes as that is the weakist point.
Its not a vaccum where dealing with here its the opposite of that.

26
Flat Earth General / Re: Mathamatic failure at the most basic level
« on: March 30, 2013, 02:47:25 PM »
So If I had 1 litre of milk in a jug and I added another litre of milk to the jug I would then have one litre of milk. 

27
Technology, Science & Alt Science / Re: perpetual motion machine?
« on: March 30, 2013, 02:35:57 PM »
It's relevant to this topic in that you are supposedly getting out much, much more energy than is put in as the story goes. Right or wrong?

How much energy do you need to put into your car to make it move down the road.

28
The Lounge / Re: 9/11 Thread-Continued from FE General
« on: March 22, 2013, 09:32:01 AM »
This thread should be locked right now.  I don't think we should entertain sceptimatic on this particular line of bullshit.
It can be locked for all I care. I wasn't the one that put it up, so what's it to me. I'm not the one crying about it, you lot are.
Where do you get off on trolling on a subject like this. The stuff about the flat earth and the moon landings where all in good fun, but now your just bieng plain disrespectful.
Just call your ISP and tell them to cut you off cos no body needs to hear your dumb shit. Then go die in a hole.

29
The Lounge / Re: 9/11 Thread-Continued from FE General
« on: March 22, 2013, 09:22:07 AM »
This thread should be locked right now.  I don't think we should entertain sceptimatic on this particular line of bullshit.

30
The Lounge / Re: 9/11 Thread-Continued from FE General
« on: March 22, 2013, 09:08:25 AM »
I suppose the families and friends of all the dead are in on the conspiracy as well. GTFO scepti.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7