A man or woman can easy done this test to proof the earth is flat or not who has a barometer and nivo. Or you can test the curvature of the earth.
We pre accept as the pressure is uniformly distributed. So same altitude has same pressure of air. With using this feature, we can calculate the curvature isin't exist. By this way.
Requirements:
- A barometer
- A nivo
- A meter (or a jalon)
Experiment:
Find out two buildings have about same high and altitude. Buildings near to Beach is compatibled for this. Choose two buildings has same number of multiples. Buildings should be at least 1 kilometre away from themselves.
Measure with a barometer on the roof of someone. Measure with a barometer on the roof of other. Find a point you can look with a nivo from one roof to the other one. measure the air pressure on that point. Mark the point as exact on a bar marked with meter. Go to the other roof. Find out same air pressure value by reading barometer. Mark it too. Create nivo to the that point.
Take care the spirit level to be true. This is the most important point.
Now.
Look from the marked point of second roof to the marked point of the first one. Depends on "world curvature calculator" you should to read 8 centimeters more. If there is no any curvature, you should to sea first marked point.
Basic, exact and deadly.
Anybody?
A man or woman can easy done this test to proof the earth is flat or not who has a barometer and nivo. Or you can test the curvature of the earth.
We pre accept as the pressure is uniformly distributed. So same altitude has same pressure of air. With using this feature, we can calculate the curvature isin't exist. By this way.
Requirements:
- A barometer
- A nivo
- A meter (or a jalon)
Experiment:
Find out two buildings have about same high and altitude. Buildings near to Beach is compatibled for this. Choose two buildings has same number of multiples. Buildings should be at least 1 kilometre away from themselves.
Measure with a barometer on the roof of someone. Measure with a barometer on the roof of other. Find a point you can look with a nivo from one roof to the other one. measure the air pressure on that point. Mark the point as exact on a bar marked with meter. Go to the other roof. Find out same air pressure value by reading barometer. Mark it too. Create nivo to the that point.
Take care the spirit level to be true. This is the most important point.
Now.
Look from the marked point of second roof to the marked point of the first one. Depends on "world curvature calculator" you should to read 8 centimeters more. If there is no any curvature, you should to sea first marked point.
Basic, exact and deadly.
With a shape: Like this:
(http://2.1m.yt/ZNRzfIR.png)
You're expecting a high degree of accuracy from a barometer wouldn't you say?
We could always whip up another $20 for this guy. I'm pretty sure he would enjoy some quiet crate time. I hear it's good for those with a fine Zetetic mind.
You're expecting a high degree of accuracy from a barometer wouldn't you say?
We could always whip up another $20 for this guy. I'm pretty sure he would enjoy some quiet crate time. I hear it's good for those with a fine Zetetic mind.
If there is a team, these things work better.
You're expecting a high degree of accuracy from a barometer wouldn't you say?
We could always whip up another $20 for this guy. I'm pretty sure he would enjoy some quiet crate time. I hear it's good for those with a fine Zetetic mind.
If there is a team, these things work better.
Yup true..true...though you might want to ensure that your team don't trip up on their straight jackets......those long sleeves can be a real hazard.
We could always whip up another $20 for this guy. I'm pretty sure he would enjoy some quiet crate time. I hear it's good for those with a fine Zetetic mind.
If there is a team, these things work better.
You can not claim that something is wrong without revealing why that thing is wrong. Now put 20 dollars in your pocket. Perhaps you'll buy the gum with it.Well, Mr İntikam, I can claim that it is wrong! Here is why you are completely wrong and it has no possibility of working.
An altimeter would be quite useless for what you want.(https://i.stack.imgur.com/uwT7Y.jpg)The tick marks are every 20 feet. One could easily eyeball 20 foot increments, and even 10 foot increments (with the pointer directly between two ticks). Similarly the pressure settings are marked every 0.02 inches of mercury (or 1mb), allowing for a fairly precise setting of the value.
Digital altimeters are extremely precise (often offering one-foot precision in their display, and 0.01 inches of mercury for the pressure setting).
From Aviation Stack Exchange (http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/3727/how-precise-are-altimeters)
Why not do a more accurate test? just like the Bedfort Level Experiment:
find a river or canal which is relatively still water and where you can look 2 miles over the water surface
Take 3 fixed poles 3m high (from tip to waterlevel): one at the beginning, one in the middle and one on the end;
look from the first pole to the third pole with binoculars or theodolite;
If FE --> all three poles should be alligned perfectly;
If GE --> the middle pole should be slightly higher.
( how do I insert images in here?)
According to the published paper you shouldn't mix concret in your bathtub.This is quite correct. Always use someone else's bathtub. Ideally when they're out.
Why not do a more accurate test? just like the Bedfort Level Experiment:
find a river or canal which is relatively still water and where you can look 2 miles over the water surface
Take 3 fixed poles 3m high (from tip to waterlevel): one at the beginning, one in the middle and one on the end;
look from the first pole to the third pole with binoculars or theodolite;
If FE --> all three poles should be alligned perfectly;
If GE --> the middle pole should be slightly higher.
( how do I insert images in here?)
Why not do a more accurate test? just like the Bedfort Level Experiment:
find a river or canal which is relatively still water and where you can look 2 miles over the water surface
Take 3 fixed poles 3m high (from tip to waterlevel): one at the beginning, one in the middle and one on the end;
look from the first pole to the third pole with binoculars or theodolite;
If FE --> all three poles should be alligned perfectly;
If GE --> the middle pole should be slightly higher.
( how do I insert images in here?)
Why not just look at one of the real time images from space....problem solved.
Welcome to the fray, surely with napoleon here we should get somewhere - just hope that there are no long cold Russian winters nor Waterloos around!Why not do a more accurate test? just like the Bedfort Level Experiment:
find a river or canal which is relatively still water and where you can look 2 miles over the water surface
Take 3 fixed poles 3m high (from tip to waterlevel): one at the beginning, one in the middle and one on the end;
look from the first pole to the third pole with binoculars or theodolite;
If FE --> all three poles should be alligned perfectly;
If GE --> the middle pole should be slightly higher.
( how do I insert images in here?)
Why not just look at one of the real time images from space....problem solved.
The hardcore FE-er doesn't consider that as proof unfortunately...you need to think like them ;)
Essentially the reasoning boils down to -
P1) If personally unverifiable evidence contradicts an obvious truth then the evidence is fabricated
P2) The FET (Flat Earth Theory) is an obvious truth
P3) There is personally unverifiable evidence that contradicts the FET
C1) The unverifiable evidence that contradicts the FET is fabricated evidence
P4) If there is large amounts of fabricated evidence then there must be a conspiracy to fabricate it
P5) There is a large amount of fabricated evidence (see C1)
C2) There must be a conspiracy to fabricate it.
sorry man but this is wrong the main problem is that in a globe model the earth is not perfect ball and this wuld be unaccurate and invalid...
sorry man but this is wrong the main problem is that in a globe model the earth is not perfect ball and this wuld be unaccurate and invalid...
This is just a defensive lie. Look to NASA videos, open the google earth, or yandex map, you'll see just a perfect curve.
You show me what NASA videos you mean, but in the meantime here is a photo of one hemisphere of the real earth.sorry man but this is wrong the main problem is that in a globe model the earth is not perfect ball and this wuld be unaccurate and invalid...
This is just a defensive lie. Look to NASA videos, open the google earth, or yandex map, you'll see just a perfect curve.
Pole to pole diameter: Equatorial diameter: | 12,714 km 12,756 km |
Why not do a more accurate test? just like the Bedfort Level Experiment:
find a river or canal which is relatively still water and where you can look 2 miles over the water surface
Take 3 fixed poles 3m high (from tip to waterlevel): one at the beginning, one in the middle and one on the end;
look from the first pole to the third pole with binoculars or theodolite;
If FE --> all three poles should be alligned perfectly;
If GE --> the middle pole should be slightly higher.
( how do I insert images in here?)
Flat earth laser test made in 2016. Proves the earth is straightly flat.
Flat earth laser test made in 2016. Proves the earth is straightly flat.
This is a great demonstration of how flat earth people are so desperate to believe anything as long as its rubbish. Any credible videos they cry FAKE and whinge about the,....but total rubbish like this made by a bunch of clowns they lap it up.
Go watch it again and see what they are really proving.....
You do need to develop a much more critical spproach.
Flat earth laser test made in 2016. Proves the earth is straightly flat.
Second part of this experiment.
Flat earth laser test made in 2016. Proves the earth is straightly flat.
Second part of this experiment.
Gumby is one of forum swearer is already in my ignore list. So I don't see / care his crap posts.Yes, we know that the childish sploit brat can't bear to read any opinions that go against hid own!
rabinoz is swearing continoesly who is already in my ignore list. So I don't care about him. God damn him and his friends.Show me where I have been swearing, you lying hypocritical spoiled brat!
I think İntikam is a cave troll hired by NASA to make the FES look even dumber than they already look.
Exactly how many more moronic threads are you going to make? Each one seems to get progressively more asinine.
I think by the simple virtue of disagreeing with whatever İntikam has to say makes the other party automatically correct.
PS- Feel free to add me to your ignore list; I don't feel I've tried hard enough to get on there tbh.
rabinoz is swearing continoesly who is already in my ignore list. So I don't care about him. God damn him and his friends.Show me where I have been swearing, you lying hypocritical spoiled brat!
You are one that claims "Nearer to god", but with all you swearing, cursing and gutter language that you know is haram to a devout Muslim,I honestly have to wonder just which god you serve.
Here is my experiment... With a pan a few inches deep, and perhaps an inch of water in it, place a level across the top. Once it is level, have two pieces of straight metal wire ready. Tape one piece of wire hanging straight down from the level at the edge of the inside of the pan until just touches the water. Tape the other piece in the middle straight down until it touches the water.You're expecting a high degree of accuracy from a barometer wouldn't you say?
It seems that we have a competition between the two world leading authorities in zeteticismical szienze.
The objective of this exciting competition is to create the sillyest experiment to prove the flatness of the globe.
You can not claim that something is wrong without revealing why that thing is wrong. Now put 20 dollars in your pocket. Perhaps you'll buy the gum with it.Well, Mr İntikam, I can claim that it is wrong! Here is why you are completely wrong and it has no possibility of working.The is absolutely no way you are going to even see 8 cm with an aneroid altimeter, let alone measure it accurately.
You might learn a bit from the FAA, they happen to be experts on high accuracy altimeters.
Take a look in Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, e-CFR data is current as of January 18, 2017 (http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=&r=PART&n=14y1.0.1.3.21#ap14.1.43_117.e) where you will lean that the allowed tolerance on aircraft altineters is 20 feet.
Look at the dial of an analog altimeter:QuoteAn altimeter would be quite useless for what you want.(https://i.stack.imgur.com/uwT7Y.jpg)The tick marks are every 20 feet. One could easily eyeball 20 foot increments, and even 10 foot increments (with the pointer directly between two ticks). Similarly the pressure settings are marked every 0.02 inches of mercury (or 1mb), allowing for a fairly precise setting of the value.
Digital altimeters are extremely precise (often offering one-foot precision in their display, and 0.01 inches of mercury for the pressure setting).
From Aviation Stack Exchange (http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/3727/how-precise-are-altimeters)
Now an ordinary spirit level is not nearly good enough, you would have you get a surveyors quality level, something like the Nikon AS-2/AE-7 Series Automatic Levels (http://www.spectraprecision.com/media/custom/upload/File-1419956535.pdf), with a telescope of:
Resolution power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AS-2/2C: 2.5", AE-7/7C: 3" (2.5" is 2.5 seconds of arc)
A 1 km distance would normally be levelled as a number of shorter runs.
The STANDARD DEVIATION in 1-km double-run levelling is about ±1.0 mm±(3+3)ppm).
The complicated looking error boils down to better than ±7.0 mm over 1 km, but this is not a local hardware store type of level.
Given a highly professional surveyor, you might manage it, but the altimeter is completely useless for small changes like this.
So now, please admit that you are completely wrong.
By the way, a geodetic surveyor can prove that the earth is not flat very easily!He would just measure the dip angle to the horizon, as Abū Rayḥān Bīrūnī did in measuring the radius of the earth over 1,000 years ago!
rabinoz is swearing continoesly who is already in my ignore list. So I don't care about him. God damn him and his friends.Show me where I have been swearing, you lying hypocritical spoiled brat!
You are one that claims "Nearer to god", but with all you swearing, cursing and gutter language that you know is haram to a devout Muslim,I honestly have to wonder just which god you serve.
The assertion that you are swearing continoesly(sic) doesn't seem correct going from any of your posts that I have seen.
You can not claim that something is wrong without revealing why that thing is wrong. Now put 20 dollars in your pocket. Perhaps you'll buy the gum with it.Well, Mr İntikam, I can claim that it is wrong! Here is why you are completely wrong and it has no possibility of working.The is absolutely no way you are going to even see 8 cm with an aneroid altimeter, let alone measure it accurately.
You might learn a bit from the FAA, they happen to be experts on high accuracy altimeters.
Take a look in Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, e-CFR data is current as of January 18, 2017 (http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=&r=PART&n=14y1.0.1.3.21#ap14.1.43_117.e) where you will lean that the allowed tolerance on aircraft altineters is 20 feet.
Look at the dial of an analog altimeter:QuoteAn altimeter would be quite useless for what you want.(https://i.stack.imgur.com/uwT7Y.jpg)The tick marks are every 20 feet. One could easily eyeball 20 foot increments, and even 10 foot increments (with the pointer directly between two ticks). Similarly the pressure settings are marked every 0.02 inches of mercury (or 1mb), allowing for a fairly precise setting of the value.
Digital altimeters are extremely precise (often offering one-foot precision in their display, and 0.01 inches of mercury for the pressure setting).
From Aviation Stack Exchange (http://aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/3727/how-precise-are-altimeters)
Now an ordinary spirit level is not nearly good enough, you would have you get a surveyors quality level, something like the Nikon AS-2/AE-7 Series Automatic Levels (http://www.spectraprecision.com/media/custom/upload/File-1419956535.pdf), with a telescope of:
Resolution power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AS-2/2C: 2.5", AE-7/7C: 3" (2.5" is 2.5 seconds of arc)
A 1 km distance would normally be levelled as a number of shorter runs.
The STANDARD DEVIATION in 1-km double-run levelling is about ±1.0 mm±(3+3)ppm).
The complicated looking error boils down to better than ±7.0 mm over 1 km, but this is not a local hardware store type of level.
Given a highly professional surveyor, you might manage it, but the altimeter is completely useless for small changes like this.
So now, please admit that you are completely wrong.
By the way, a geodetic surveyor can prove that the earth is not flat very easily!He would just measure the dip angle to the horizon, as Abū Rayḥān Bīrūnī did in measuring the radius of the earth over 1,000 years ago!
I wholeheartedly agree with this, İntikam.
Rab just destroyed you. My condolences.