does anyone else have any input?
Questions like yours have been asked a lot, have thread about it in the first couple of pages, or covered by the wiki. I would not be surprised if some FE's are just tired of answering these questions.
1. universal acceleration(UA) is not believed by every FE. If the Earth was accelerating upwards it would be hard to tell the difference between that a gravity. Stuff would behave the same.
2. A lot of people do.
3. Shadow object is the best explanation I have seen.
Not here, but I have seen it explained that the moon is hollow with a opaque and transparent surface that rotates.
Weather patterns have also been mentioned.
Bioluminescent life is another thing I have seen mentioned.
4. They are faked
They are pieces of the dome that fell off.
they can't be tired of answering those questions, they're irrefutably disproven
1. I don't normally discuss gravity but the travelling upwards theory doesn't work due to it having enough force to put a ball back down but not enough to move smoke, smoke is lighter than a ball, therefore WOULD be affected also
2. angular sun rays you can disprove yourself, go to a beach, see the sun shining on the sea, get on a boat, try to reach the shine
OR
get a friend on a boat, you stay on the beach, you watch him sail past the shine YOU see, then ask him to point a camera towards shore and take a picture, the shine YOU see BETWEEN you and him will NOT be visible on the photo, this is simply because from HIS perspective, it will be behind him
OR
at the beach, travel 10mins up the coast, the sun will seem to follow you, travel back the other way, it will still follow you, it's not localised, the above methods ALL prove it without question
3. the shadow object would without question dim the lights of other stars, but it doesn't, so the dark object theory simply doesn't work, again, it's also not part of the flat earth model
4. they exist, you can see them with your own eyes, if it was part of a GLASS dome, they wouldn't land as rock.. meteors disprove the dome
like I said, I've looked into this for a long time, flat earthers don't agree with each other, depending on how you present evidence, meteors are usually described as man-made, I've only ever heard 3 people use the "god made" firmament breaking off theory, it's quite a new one, demeaning the work of god, as is saying the universe doesn't exist
please note, I'm not offensive, I'm not abusive, I've researched this for around 3yrs, I'm just challenging the proofs flat earthers use as they don't stand up to testing
thanks