I'll agree with you only when somebody else (other than me) will present the following: the algorithm for the zeta zeros (without using mathematical analysis), and thus solve the Riemann hypothesis for good; as a good measure on top of that to invent a new formula for the logarithm using only the square root function. It ain't gonna happen. Until then, I am better than they are, you should know this by now. Talk to any high-ranking mathematician and show them my algorithm, they'll slap your face for free for having doubted me.
Since you don't know much about gravity in general you might be surprised to find out that the mechanism for gravity (sorry, it is not attractive) has been put forth, and all physicists agree on that.
Pay attention.
Gravity is a wormhole in the center of a right-handed graviton which absorbs aether.Got it?
In 1969, Dr. H.G. Ellis published his famous paper in which he had proved that the only working model of an wormhole is that which absorbs aether. Imagine trying to publish a paper whose title includes the word "ether drainhole" in 1969 in the most famous and prestigious journal of mathematical physics in the world. It took four years for the peer-reviewers to verify each and every equation, since they could not believe it could be true, and finally, in 1973, his paper was published in the Journal of Mathematical Physics:
Ether flow through a drainhole: A particle model in general relativity
Journal of Mathematical Physics. 14: 104–118
http://euclid.colorado.edu/~ellis/RelativityPapers/EtFlThDrPaMoGeRe.pdfThe weight of an object is given by the amount of aether which can be absorbed.
One cannot have quantum gravity without particles, unless a non perturbative observable can be defined in their place
"Absence of particles means absence of Poincare invariance, no standard Fock space.
Particle physics is defined by local perturbative quantum field theory (Poincare groups).
However, Planck level physics is governed by general covariance.
That is why quantum gravity must be defined in terms of loops/knots.
Knot theory is the physical theory that classifies the independent physical states of the quantum field.
Genuine quantum gravitational physics is non perturbative.
General relativity forced in the quantum perturbative framework doesn't work."
Dr. Carlo Rovelli
Are knots quantum states of spacetime?
Knots, Topology And Quantum Field Theory (pg. 51-69)
A graviton is a string with closed loops.
None other than the greatest mathematician of all time, B. Riemann, had said this about gravity:
B. Riemann stated in 1853 that "gravitational aether sinks toward massive objects where it is absorbed, at a rate proportional to their mass, and is then emitted into another spatial dimension".
Quantum Gravity is not a quantization of the spacetime coordinates, metric.....If this were the case, one would have had quantized the spacetime coordinates long ago. In String Theory, from the two-dim world sheet point of view , the spacetime coordinates are nothing but a finite number of scalar fields whose quantization is essentially trivial by selecting the conformal or orthonormal gauge. The same arguments applies with the ( linearized ) spin two graviton. Quantum Gravity it is something much deeper than the naive notion of coordinates and gravitons. It is something that doesn’t need any spacetime background nor metrics whatsoever. Morever, it involves something that disposes of the ill-conceived notion of having a fixed dimension. The classical spacetime that we perceive with our senses is just a long distance averaging effect associated with a quantum network of processeses of a deeper underlying Quantum Universe. To merge Quantum Mechanics with Relativity it is necessary to enlarge the Einsteinian view of Relativity to a New Relativity Principle.
Quantum entanglement is the needle that stitches together the cosmic zero point energy tapestry.
All subquarks, bosons and antibosons are connected by gray wormholes (receptive/emissive) created by the counter-rotating tetrahedrons (one is a shadow of the other) located in the center of the pyramidion.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.3035.pdfBuilding up spacetime with quantum entanglement
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.08444.pdfRecovering Geometry from Bulk Entanglement
A version of the ER=EPR conjecture is recovered, in that perturbations that entangle distant parts of the emergent geometry generate a configuration that may be considered as a highly quantum wormhole.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/black-holes-prove-that-anti-de-sitter-space-time-is-unstable-20200511/ (Horava-Lifshitz ether model wormhole requires anti de-Sitter space)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.1503.pdfRotating Ellis Wormholes in Four Dimensions
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.2448.pdfRotating Wormholes in Five Dimensions
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712.02143.pdfWormholes Immersed in Rotating Matter
We here add a new twist to this quest by immersing the wormhole throat inside rotating matter, which we take as composed of a complex boson field, since this allows for the possibility to impose rotation on the bosonic field by the choice of an appropriate ansatz.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.05253.pdfGeometry of Spinning Ellis Wormholes
https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0508117.pdfRotating Scalar Field Wormhole
https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0502099.pdfPhantom energy traversable wormholes
Julian Sonner, a senior postdoc in MIT’s Laboratory for Nuclear Science and Center for Theoretical Physics, has published his results in the journal Physical Review Letters, where it appears together with a related paper by Kristan Jensen of the University of Victoria and Andreas Karch of the University of Washington.
The tangled web that is gravity
He found that what emerged was a wormhole connecting the two entangled quarks, implying that the creation of quarks simultaneously creates a wormhole. More fundamentally, he says, gravity itself may be a result of entanglement. What’s more, the universe’s geometry as described by classical gravity may be a consequence of entanglement—pairs of particles strung together by tunneling wormholes.http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0905/0905.1667.pdfA Scenario for Strong Gravity in Particle Physics
At the Planck scale it may well be impossible to disentangle black holes from elementary particles.
G. ‘t Hooft, On the quantum structure of a black hole, Nucl. Phys. B256 , 727 (1985)
We suggest that the behavior of these extreme dilaton black holes….can reasonably be interpreted as the holes doing their best to behave like normal elementary particles.
All particles may be varying forms of stabilized black holes.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9202014.pdfBlack Holes as Elementary Particles
https://mappingignorance.org/2013/11/22/entangled-through-a-wormhole/https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F1-4020-4339-2_6The deepest connection between gravity and quantum entanglement:
“The universality of the gravitational interaction comes directly from the universality of entanglement- it is not possible to have stress-energy that doesn’t source the gravitational field because it is not possible to have degrees of freedom that don’t contribute to entanglement entropy.”https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.2933.pdfUniversality of Gravity from Entanglement
At this point you might ask, what about other wormhole models? They are not stable, only the Ellis wormhole is a true working model.
Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet wormholes
EGB wormhole model: dilaton and electrovacuum.
The EdGB is unstable.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.11170.pdfThe electrovacuum has huge issues with it as well.
The causality constraints of higher curvature models were studied, and it was shown in
particular that a theory such as EGB has to be supplemented with massive higher-spin fields in order to be free of causality problems. Causal structure of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet (EGB) theory has also been studied in [29,30], where different notions closely connected to causality are studied in detail, such as the relation between Killing horizons and characteristic hypersurfaces, hyperbolicity in the near horizon regions.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.6737.pdfKaluza-Klein wormholes
https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.064018https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9807086.pdfhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.1320.pdfhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/9909102.pdfAether compactification of the Kaluza-Klein dimensions:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0802.0521.pdfhttps://web.archive.org/web/20150319104103/bourabai.ru/winter/relativ.htm (Planck plasma)
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1920865#msg1920865 (Kaluza-Klein particles, Planck ether, two consecutive messages)
Kaluza-Klein wormholes must use ether.
Conformal Weyl gravity wormholes
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.05054.pdfhttps://www.arxiv-vanity.com/papers/0801.4401/https://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.04145.pdfWeyl ether:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2182319#msg2182319https://arxiv.org/pdf/1608.00285.pdfhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.06355.pdfPalatini f(R,T) wormholes
https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0703132.pdfhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/0712.1141.pdfCartan wormholes
https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9802046.pdfWe also discuss wormhole throats in the presence of fully antisymmetric torsion and find that the energy condition violations cannot be dumped into the torsion degrees of freedom.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/9901020.pdfThe Cartan torsion theory is a dynamical degenerate case of the more general Poincare gauge theory of gravity. The NEC would always have to be violated for such a specific torsion even in the more general Poincare gauge theory of gravity.
The resulting forces from the Einstein-Cartain torsion theory are some 27 orders of magnitude smaller than the gravitational effects of GR. Further, the EC theory applies to static field geometries around rotating objects.
Dynamical Ricci torsion is some 21 to 22 orders of magnitude larger than EC torsion.
Ricci flow wormholes
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0809.0957.pdfSpacetime foam = zero point energy = ether
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1012/1012.5264.pdfDo not ever doubt that I am very good at what I do.