Th3rms most compelling evidence and why he believes the earth is flat.

Quote from: Shifter on October 24, 2017, 08:08:01 PM

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 24, 2017, 08:01:58 PM

Quote from: Shifter on October 24, 2017, 07:59:14 PM

The problem is this guy th3rm has presented no math or no science to debunk. It's his strategy to prevent people from debating him on any serious level

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 24, 2017, 07:51:13 PM

D1 is claiming you question your sanity, not me. He's done it several times so far.

You were the one with your faux concern for my welfare saying I was a schizophrenic for questioning chemtrails and believing the government or other corporations could be out to do us harm.

Okay, I'll humor you. Why would corporations want to kill the people who make them rich?

Probably the same reason you want to have all poor people killed off?

Uh, what? That has nothing to do with it. Poor people don't spend a lot of money, naturally. Are the chemtrails made of poor-seeking molecules?

Let me refresh your memory

Quote from: Rayzor on October 05, 2017, 10:20:21 PM

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 05, 2017, 10:06:07 PM

Sure, I'm not denying that. I'm just saying we should kill the poor. 

What, and deprive the military of their main source of cannon fodder?   

Ah shit, you have an excellent point.

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 24, 2017, 08:09:43 PM

Quote from: Shifter on October 24, 2017, 08:08:01 PM

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 24, 2017, 08:01:58 PM

Quote from: Shifter on October 24, 2017, 07:59:14 PM

The problem is this guy th3rm has presented no math or no science to debunk. It's his strategy to prevent people from debating him on any serious level

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 24, 2017, 07:51:13 PM

D1 is claiming you question your sanity, not me. He's done it several times so far.

You were the one with your faux concern for my welfare saying I was a schizophrenic for questioning chemtrails and believing the government or other corporations could be out to do us harm.

Okay, I'll humor you. Why would corporations want to kill the people who make them rich?

Probably the same reason you want to have all poor people killed off?

Uh, what? That has nothing to do with it. Poor people don't spend a lot of money, naturally. Are the chemtrails made of poor-seeking molecules?

Let me refresh your memory

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 05, 2017, 10:32:04 PM

Quote from: Rayzor on October 05, 2017, 10:20:21 PM

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 05, 2017, 10:06:07 PM

Sure, I'm not denying that. I'm just saying we should kill the poor. 

What, and deprive the military of their main source of cannon fodder?   

Ah shit, you have an excellent point.

Did I ever deny that I said that? I'm talking about corporations. Try to keep up, buddy.

Therm friendly reminder of the thread topic. There is a chemtrail thread in tech and alt to discuss this.

That is off topic and irrelevant.

He is looking for a life raft. Don't give him one.

Th3rm you have two options well, four, just one involves being embarrassed continually on this thread and the other involves you leaving.

This thread is about the evidence in favour of your flat earth.

So far absolutely none has been presented while a compelling case for a spherical earth has already been made.

Don't let the F.E.S down therm

I hope you can apologise.

OK so back to topic

I really  want to see a flat earth math. Can you give us anything th3rm?

Does the value of Pi work on a flat earth or the flat earth map, Or is the value of Pi, just rubbish and part of the conspiracy?

OK so back to topic

I really  want to see a flat earth math. Can you give us anything th3rm?

Does the value of Pi work on a flat earth or the flat earth map, Or is the value of Pi, just rubbish and part of the conspiracy?

What? Pi is pi. Math is math. What do you mean by a flat Earth math? That's a nonsensical statement.

Well therm, if you read. Pi would be different in non euclidean space. It would be measured differently at different points of curvature. That is simply not the case.

It also debunks the NE-FE, nice work shifter.

So we've concluded that the earth looking flat at ground level isn't proof for either a round or flat earth.

I will put forward that the most likely explanation for the sunset and sunrise is the earth is a ball. Heliocentric or Geocentric take your pick.

If you are unable to debunk this you have to concede the point.

Well therm, if you read. Pi would be different in non euclidean space. It would be measured differently at different points of curvature. That is simply not the case.

It also debunks the NE-FE, nice work shifter.

So we've concluded that the earth looking flat at ground level isn't proof for either a round or flat earth.

I will put forward that the most likely explanation for the sunset and sunrise is the earth is a ball. Heliocentric or Geocentric take your pick.

If you are unable to debunk this you have to concede the point.

Obviously that's the one scenario it would be something other than 3.14, but pi is still pi.

Seeing as I've already explained how the better explanation for the Earth appearing flat is that it's flat, the most likely explanation for sunsets can't be a round Earth.

Quote from: disputeone on October 24, 2017, 08:28:58 PM

Well therm, if you read. Pi would be different in non euclidean space. It would be measured differently at different points of curvature. That is simply not the case.

It also debunks the NE-FE, nice work shifter.

So we've concluded that the earth looking flat at ground level isn't proof for either a round or flat earth.

I will put forward that the most likely explanation for the sunset and sunrise is the earth is a ball. Heliocentric or Geocentric take your pick.

If you are unable to debunk this you have to concede the point.

Obviously that's the one scenario it would be something other than 3.14, but pi is still pi.

Seeing as I've already explained how the better explanation for the Earth appearing flat is that it's flat, the most likely explanation for sunsets can't be a round Earth.

Translation: I reject all evidence that counters my delusional beliefs.

No see we concluded that a large enough ball or flat earth would look flat from the surface. With maths .

Do you have any evidence? I'm really starting to think you were leading me on about the shape you think the earth is.

Pro tip.

You are a mediocre at best abysmal at worse troll. You are nothing special. Pretending the earth is flat isn't funny it's just going full retard.

No see we concluded that a large enough ball or flat earth would look flat from the surface. With maths .

Do you have any evidence? I'm really starting to think you were leading me on about the shape you think the earth is.

Pro tip.

You are a mediocre at best abysmal at worse troll. You are nothing special. Pretending the earth is flat isn't funny it's just going full retard.

You've clearly missed the point again.

What point would that be.

You see I am but I humble sheep who believes in maths and science. I cannot possibly be asked to understand the smartest and greatest scientist in the world, nay, to have ever lived first try, give me time.

Scepti was more patient with me

What point would that be.

You see I am but I humble sheep who believes in maths and science. I cannot possibly be asked to understand the smartest and greatest scientist in the world first try, give me time.

Scepti was more patient with me

I'm losing interest.

No. You're just losing

If I be more polite and accommodating will you present any evidence of your flat earth because so far there is zero.

The floor is yours sorry for being impolite my all knowing leige. Teach me please. Teach me of the flat earth and of real science hidden from the unseeing. Teach me wise one.

It is written that there is a fifth way out of this. To those willing to sacrifice their pride.

It involves putting your tail between your legs and running away from this thread.

I will call you a certain word that starts with c and ends with d, rhymes with a good old PM of ours.

Good day, th3rm.

No. You're just losing

You haven't made any actual counter points...

Very astute. Not a single counterpoint has been raised because not a single point has been raised. Very good.

Sunrise, Sunset, equatorial mounts, telescopes and star trails, the southern cross in the southern hemisphere. Trigonometry and a high altitude plane flight to see curvature for 50k.

Enlighten us senpai. You asked for it.

Very astute. Not a single counterpoint has been raised because not a single point has been raised. Very good.

Quote from: disputeone on October 24, 2017, 04:05:10 PM

Sunrise, Sunset, equatorial mounts, telescopes and star trails, the southern cross in the southern hemisphere. Trigonometry and a high altitude plane flight to see curvature for 50k.

Enlighten us senpai. You asked for it.

Again, these aren't questions.
I also wasn't addressing you.

What? Pi is pi. Math is math. What do you mean by a flat Earth math? That's a nonsensical statement.

Hey, summat''s wrong, I'm agreeing with you, th3rm0m3t3r0, in that π is always  π.
Even though, in a non-Euclidean space, the circumference of a circle might not be 2 x π x radius.

That's his debating tactic

What happened th3rm Sometime in April 2014, you decided to either troll the flat earthers here as if you were one of them, or you discovered something bigger than anything in the history of mankind ever that was big enough for a guy fond of math and science to reject it all for the flat earth

Occam's Razor (you seem to be a fan of) would tell me between these 2 possibilities that your just trolling

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 24, 2017, 08:20:26 PM

What? Pi is pi. Math is math. What do you mean by a flat Earth math? That's a nonsensical statement.

Hey, summat''s wrong, I'm agreeing with you, th3rm0m3t3r0, in that π is always  π.
Even though, in a non-Euclidean space, the circumference of a circle might not be 2 x π x radius.

Therefore pi would not be 3.14 in said shpayze.

That's his debating tactic

What happened th3rm Sometime in April 2014, you decided to either troll the flat earthers here as if you were one of them, or you discovered something bigger than anything in the history of mankind ever that was big enough for a guy fond of math and science to reject it all for the flat earth

Occam's Razor (you seem to be a fan of) would tell me between these 2 possibilities that your just trolling

I thought it was long than that, but it's sort of irrelevant. What is your point again?

Quote from: rabinoz on October 24, 2017, 09:09:40 PM

Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on October 24, 2017, 08:20:26 PM

What? Pi is pi. Math is math. What do you mean by a flat Earth math? That's a nonsensical statement.

Hey, summat''s wrong, I'm agreeing with you, th3rm0m3t3r0, in that π is always  π.
Even though, in a non-Euclidean space, the circumference of a circle might not be 2 x π x radius.

Therefore pi would not be 3.14 in said shpayze.

Pi isn't 3.14 on a flat Earth?

Not according to any flat earth map ever put out there

Not according to any flat earth map ever put out there

...What?

Here is your chance to reconcile flat earth maps, logic and pi. Should be easy for the most intelligent person on Earth

Quote from: rabinoz on October 24, 2017, 06:03:31 PM

OK, am I allowed three? or am I now asking four, ..... ?

• Why do you believe that the earth is flat?
• What is the general shape of your flat earth?
• Where are the North Pole, Equator and South Pole on your flat earth.
  

It looks flat.

You seem to have added nothing in the rest of the thread so I'll go back to answer this.

Yes, it looks as though you have nothing more than, "The earth looks flat, so it must be flat."

Here's some contrary evidence that I posted before, but from what I recall you ignored it them:

From near sea-level, sure looks perfectly flat and level.

From Concorde, 50,000 ft, maybe a bit of a curve there.

Losing Your Ride at 121,000 Feet - starting to look convincing! From a Flat Earther's video.

That sure looks curved to me, from about 200 miles, must be CGI

Not only does it look curved, but as Galileo is reputed to have said: It sure doesn't look flat to me! And by the way, the earth does not measure flat either.

Not sure, probably a disk.
The north pole is to the north. The south pole is to the south.

Maybe, but is the a single point that is the North Pole and a single point that is the South Pole?

According to the most accurate FE map and method. The NE-FE map developed by Jane, pi doesn't equal 3.14.

Do you have a more accurate map?
I'd love to see it. Jrowe had map too.

Here is your chance to reconcile flat earth maps, logic and pi. Should be easy for the most intelligent person on Earth

I never claimed that. If that's how you feel, you're wrong, but so be it.

You claimed all modern scientists were wrong and you were right.

I think you're the smartest person on the flat earth mate. Hands down straight up genius.

Here is your chance to reconcile flat earth maps, logic and pi. Should be easy for the most intelligent person on Earth

No no, you have it all wrong, İntikam, John Davis, Sceptimatic, JRoweSkeptic, Sandokhan and Heiwa is the most intelligent person on Earth.

For some strange reason my Grammar Checker thinks there is something grammatically wrong with that sentence. I can't think why!