-
You see two of the the world most liars in same screen.
(https://i.hizliresim.com/Pl2z98.png)
Holy family. Mother and son!
-
You see two of the the world most liars in same screen.
(https://i.hizliresim.com/Pl2z98.png)
Valiant fighters against the evil deception of Brotherhood of the Deceivers
And here is a picture of the person who speads the most lies of anyone on earth!(https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/avr/avatar_1459567_1494510077.gif)
Leader of the Brotherhood of the Deceivers.
-
You see two of the the world most liars in same screen.
(https://i.hizliresim.com/Pl2z98.png)
Holy family. Mother and son!
Brother dome, if you notice the mother has an Adams apple, it is probably the same person posing as another.
-
Can't you see the nictitating membrane?
-
Holy family. Mother and son!
She's 4 years younger than him. Must have been a difficult pregnancy.
-
Holy family. Mother and son!
She's 4 years younger than him. Must have been a difficult pregnancy.
Still, the difference is uncanny, and she sounds like a real douche worthy of anyones contempt.
-
Holy family. Mother and son!
She's 4 years younger than him. Must have been a difficult pregnancy.
Still, the difference is uncanny, and she sounds like a real douche worthy of anyones contempt.
Yeah, president of a country by age 46, what a loser
-
Holy family. Mother and son!
She's 4 years younger than him. Must have been a difficult pregnancy.
Still, the difference is uncanny, and she sounds like a real douche worthy of anyones contempt.
Yeah, president of a country by age 46, what a loser
Look at her haircut.
-
Holy family. Mother and son!
She's 4 years younger than him. Must have been a difficult pregnancy.
Still, the difference is uncanny, and she sounds like a real douche worthy of anyones contempt.
You should spend some time listening to yourself for a while.
-
Holy family. Mother and son!
She's 4 years younger than him. Must have been a difficult pregnancy.
Still, the difference is uncanny, and she sounds like a real douche worthy of anyones contempt.
You should spend some time listening to yourself for a while.
I don't propose to be a leader of a country.
-
Holy family. Mother and son!
She's 4 years younger than him. Must have been a difficult pregnancy.
Still, the difference is uncanny, and she sounds like a real douche worthy of anyones contempt.
Creeps, under the cloak of anonymity, can say the most outrageous things about people who deserve our respect like:(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/In%C4%81ra_M%C5%ABrniece_tiekas_ar_Igaunijas_prezidenti_%2829833775594%29.jpg)
President of Estonia, Kersti Kaljulaid
Born 30 December 1969 in Tartu, Estonia
-
According to the brotherhood of the dome she fights against the flat earth. So a President of a country devotes her time to fighting against a minority belief system? Why should we respect someone who is so bigoted? We all have things we believe in, if someone wants to believe the earth is flat who is she to fight them? And why does she care? And of course..... That hair
(https://i.hizliresim.com/Pl2z98.png)
-
According to the brotherhood of the dome she fights against the flat earth.
And you take brotherhood of the dome's word that "she fights against the flat earth"!
So a President of a country devotes her time to fighting against a minority belief system?
Do you have any independent evidence of that? Or do we now convict on the unsupported evidence of one highly biased person?
Why should we respect someone who is so bigoted?
Yes why, "should we respect someone who is so bigoted?" But where is there any proof that the President of Estonia, Kersti Kaljulaid is "so bigoted"?
The most bigoted pair here seem to be you and brotherhood of the dome
We all have things we believe in, if someone wants to believe the earth is flat who is she to fight them? And why does she care?
Who is to say she doesn't? You?
And of course..... That hair
Now that is the rock bottom! You suspect a woman because of her current hair-do! So, what do you think of this suspicious looking individual?(https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/avr/avatar_1459567_1494510077.gif)
At least we are learning what sort of person this Shifter really is!
-
According to the brotherhood of the dome she fights against the flat earth. So a President of a country devotes her time to fighting against a minority belief system? Why should we respect someone who is so bigoted? We all have things we believe in, if someone wants to believe the earth is flat who is she to fight them? And why does she care? And of course..... That hair
Not according to me; but according to herself, she fights against FE.
Kaljulaid: it is important to fight against the “flat Earth” theories
source (https://www.president.ee/en/media/press-releases/12910-president-kaljulaid-it-is-important-to-fight-against-the-flat-earth-theories/index.html)
Why is it important? Why? Because, fighters against the flat earth theories have putted her that chair!
We know the interest to the FE is high in Estonia. In my opinion, flat earth believersw should merge in Estonia and present a candidate against that bitch.
-
You see two of the the world most liars in same screen.
(https://i.hizliresim.com/Pl2z98.png)
Holy family. Mother and son!
Brother dome, if you notice the mother has an Adams apple, it is probably the same person posing as another.
It maybe hard to change the dress and run with a country to another constantly. maternal twin is possible.
-
According to the brotherhood of the dome she fights against the flat earth. So a President of a country devotes her time to fighting against a minority belief system? Why should we respect someone who is so bigoted? We all have things we believe in, if someone wants to believe the earth is flat who is she to fight them? And why does she care? And of course..... That hair
Not according to me; but according to herself, she fights against FE.
Kaljulaid: it is important to fight against the “flat Earth” theories
source (https://www.president.ee/en/media/press-releases/12910-president-kaljulaid-it-is-important-to-fight-against-the-flat-earth-theories/index.html)
Why is it important? Why? Because, fighters against the flat earth theories have putted her that chair!
We know the interest to the FE is high in Estonia. In my opinion, flat earth believersw should merge in Estonia and present a candidate against that bitch.
Perhaps she is simply fighting against ignorance. In a nutshell, that is what FE is; naked ignorance.
-
According to the brotherhood of the dome she fights against the flat earth. So a President of a country devotes her time to fighting against a minority belief system? Why should we respect someone who is so bigoted? We all have things we believe in, if someone wants to believe the earth is flat who is she to fight them? And why does she care? And of course..... That hair
Not according to me; but according to herself, she fights against FE.
Kaljulaid: it is important to fight against the “flat Earth” theories
source (https://www.president.ee/en/media/press-releases/12910-president-kaljulaid-it-is-important-to-fight-against-the-flat-earth-theories/index.html)
Why is it important? Why? Because, fighters against the flat earth theories have putted her that chair!
We know the interest to the FE is high in Estonia. In my opinion, flat earth believersw should merge in Estonia and present a candidate against that bitch.
Perhaps she is simply fighting against ignorance. In a nutshell, that is what FE is; naked ignorance.
She singled out flat earthers. She is despicable.
-
She singled out flat earthers. She is despicable.
No, brotherhood of the dome accused her of "singling out flat earthers", that is quite a different story.
And brotherhood of the dome accuses numerous people with no proof.
-
Did you see the link he provided?
https://www.president.ee/en/media/press-releases/12910-president-kaljulaid-it-is-important-to-fight-against-the-flat-earth-theories/index.html (https://www.president.ee/en/media/press-releases/12910-president-kaljulaid-it-is-important-to-fight-against-the-flat-earth-theories/index.html)
These are her words. Brotherhood of the dome was not lying!
-
According to the brotherhood of the dome she fights against the flat earth. So a President of a country devotes her time to fighting against a minority belief system? Why should we respect someone who is so bigoted? We all have things we believe in, if someone wants to believe the earth is flat who is she to fight them? And why does she care? And of course..... That hair
Not according to me; but according to herself, she fights against FE.
Kaljulaid: it is important to fight against the “flat Earth” theories
source (https://www.president.ee/en/media/press-releases/12910-president-kaljulaid-it-is-important-to-fight-against-the-flat-earth-theories/index.html)
Why is it important? Why? Because, fighters against the flat earth theories have putted her that chair!
We know the interest to the FE is high in Estonia. In my opinion, flat earth believersw should merge in Estonia and present a candidate against that bitch.
Perhaps she is simply fighting against ignorance. In a nutshell, that is what FE is; naked ignorance.
She singled out flat earthers. She is despicable.
-
She has published her hate to the "flat earth/ reality" in her national web page. Pay attention to the adress: www.president.ee. How can a news be more reliable than such as this one?
-
She singled out flat earthers. She is despicable.
No, brotherhood of the dome accused her of "singling out flat earthers", that is quite a different story.
And brotherhood of the dome accuses numerous people with no proof.
You have singled out flat earthers, there is plenty of proof, perhaps she is your alt.
-
She has published her hate to the "flat earth/ reality" in her national web page. Pay attention to the adress: www.president.ee. How can a news be more reliable than such as this one?
"I have recently given a lot of consideration to science, as the world is raising people who can not make a distinction between sciences and pseudo-sciences. It is very important to help people distinguish science from entertainment," said President Kersti Kaljulaid today as she handed over the Young Scientist Awards of the Cultural Foundation of the President of the Republic.
I've read through here speech and there isn't an ounce of "hate" in it! A well respected person saying she thinks ignorance and pseudo-science are bad.
-
She has published her hate to the "flat earth/ reality" in her national web page. Pay attention to the adress: www.president.ee. How can a news be more reliable than such as this one?
"I have recently given a lot of consideration to science, as the world is raising people who can not make a distinction between sciences and pseudo-sciences. It is very important to help people distinguish science from entertainment," said President Kersti Kaljulaid today as she handed over the Young Scientist Awards of the Cultural Foundation of the President of the Republic.
I've read through here speech and there isn't an ounce of "hate" in it! A well respected person saying she thinks ignorance and pseudo-science are bad.
You have readed the wrong parapragh. It is not surprise because your all life is wrong.
"Today, when a considerable share of people has become used to looking forward to their annual horoscope at the start of every year, it is extremely important to fight against "flat earth" theories. Therefore, I am very pleased that you have also contributed to speaking about science apart from your everyday research work," said the President of the Republic.
Look the lie. Do you see the lie? If you can't see, you are blind! Tell me;
Are we flat earthers "use their annual horoscope at the start of every year"? Where can you show me an evidence about we do? No, definitely we don't. We are men act more scientific than this liar. She is definitely slandering us. She is the most dishonest liar in the world! But if she talk about someones outside of us, I don't care. We are the flat earth society and we are the real flat earth believers. If she is getting adress another ones outside of here, who cares? This is a scam, she is a liar; she is photocopy of the Brian Cox the clown!
God damn her! Liar! Dishonest!
-
"willfully Ignorant" is NOT a protected class of society.
Your bigot card is not playable in this game.
-
Shut up ignorant. There is a slander against us. We have the right to defend us.
-
Shut up ignorant. There is a slander against us. We have the right to defend us.
So take her your mountains of evidence, and your unified flat earth map. Present the results of centuries of verifiable, repeatable experimentation, and show her how wrong she is.
-
Shut up ignorant. There is a slander against us. We have the right to defend us.
Shut up ignorant. You are slandering innocent people for no cause.
No government on earth is attacking you or even has any serious thoughts about you and your stupid "brotherhood of the dome".
It's all in your imagination and you honestly need to see a good psychiatrist!
By bye, you demented idiot!
-
Shut up ignorant. There is a slander against us. We have the right to defend us.
So take her your mountains of evidence, and your unified flat earth map. Present the results of centuries of verifiable, repeatable experimentation, and show her how wrong she is.
This is not same thing with horoscouple. I drawed the map by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method; not by looking the stars. But perhaps, she is using stars to understand the flat earth believers!
-
This is not same thing with horoscouple. I drawed the map by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method; not by looking the stars. But perhaps, she is using stars to understand the flat earth believers!
What on earth is a " ;D ;D horoscouple ;D ;D"?
And your map that you "drawed . . . by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method" is total garbage!
You totally ignore distances that you didn't like, so there is nothing statistical or scientific about it.
I don't think she cares about understanding flat earth believers, she probably doesn't know that you even exist!
-
May God damn that president son of whore bitch to infinitive.
-
Shut up ignorant. There is a slander against us. We have the right to defend us.
So take her your mountains of evidence, and your unified flat earth map. Present the results of centuries of verifiable, repeatable experimentation, and show her how wrong she is.
This is not same thing with horoscouple. I drawed the map by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method; not by looking the stars. But perhaps, she is using stars to understand the flat earth believers!
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
-
Shut up ignorant. There is a slander against us. We have the right to defend us.
So take her your mountains of evidence, and your unified flat earth map. Present the results of centuries of verifiable, repeatable experimentation, and show her how wrong she is.
This is not same thing with horoscouple. I drawed the map by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method; not by looking the stars. But perhaps, she is using stars to understand the flat earth believers!
Except your map is not scientific as it requires some seriously unscientific assumptions! Especially when you ignore all those flights that suggest you are wrong! It is pretty much the definition of "unscientific" when you do that.
As for horoscopes I know little except that my sister used to write them for a newspaper she used to work for. She was quite literally told to make them up by her boss! Of course it's entirely feasible that it was a one off and all the other ones you see are real, but I know what my view is.
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
-
Shut up ignorant. There is a slander against us. We have the right to defend us.
So take her your mountains of evidence, and your unified flat earth map. Present the results of centuries of verifiable, repeatable experimentation, and show her how wrong she is.
This is not same thing with horoscouple. I drawed the map by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method; not by looking the stars. But perhaps, she is using stars to understand the flat earth believers!
Except your map is not scientific as it requires some seriously unscientific assumptions! Especially when you ignore all those flights that suggest you are wrong! It is pretty much the definition of "unscientific" when you do that.
As for horoscopes I know little except that my sister used to write them for a newspaper she used to work for. She was quite literally told to make them up by her boss! Of course it's entirely feasible that it was a one off and all the other ones you see are real, but I know what my view is.
Nope. I ignored only companies in the black list. Black listed companies are already dishonest ones providing wrong information for unfair competition. Their unfair competition is their problem, but I can't consider the liars. I detected them by statistically, not by compared with the map.
As for horoscopes;
You can see them in "so called scientific magazines", "media is under control of globist liars" and other sources. If you want, I may bring here a few materials come from many globist sites. But you can't find a source to show I worked a bit about them. Because I am scientific and your sources are the most unscientific ones.
I am unscientific only in your dreams! But your dreams can't change the fact!
-
Shut up ignorant. There is a slander against us. We have the right to defend us.
So take her your mountains of evidence, and your unified flat earth map. Present the results of centuries of verifiable, repeatable experimentation, and show her how wrong she is.
This is not same thing with horoscouple. I drawed the map by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method; not by looking the stars. But perhaps, she is using stars to understand the flat earth believers!
Except your map is not scientific as it requires some seriously unscientific assumptions! Especially when you ignore all those flights that suggest you are wrong! It is pretty much the definition of "unscientific" when you do that.
As for horoscopes I know little except that my sister used to write them for a newspaper she used to work for. She was quite literally told to make them up by her boss! Of course it's entirely feasible that it was a one off and all the other ones you see are real, but I know what my view is.
Nope. I ignored only companies in the black list. Black listed companies are already dishonest ones providing wrong information for unfair competition. Their unfair competition is their problem, but I can't consider the liars. I detected them by statistically, not by compared with the map.
As for horoscopes;
You can see them in "so called scientific magazines", "media is under control of globist liars" and other sources. If you want, I may bring here a few materials come from many globist sites. But you can't find a source to show I worked a bit about them. Because I am scientific and your sources are the most unscientific ones.
I am unscientific only in your dreams! But your dreams can't change the fact!
The scientific method is not to ignore inconvenient results
-
This is not same thing with horoscouple. I drawed the map by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method; not by looking the stars. But perhaps, she is using stars to understand the flat earth believers!
Mr Brotherhood of the Dome, why do you tell outright lies in every post? I know for a fact that you do and you cannot deny it!
I know and will swear in any court of law if required to that I do not have any alts.
Yet in every signature or yours, you lyingly claim that I am sickinoz and that JackBlack and sokarul are my alts!
(http://i68.tinypic.com/2wf4c37.png)
So I know that you lie in your signature and if you lie so openly there I must assume that all of your posts are lies!
Goodbye, you useless liar.
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
You clearly proved you are ignorance about modern aviation and was said lie about your drivings. I'm sorry but I must say that, you are one of the dishonest liar ever I saw in this forum. Because I already considered all types of aircrafts. I know very well which one can go 30 hours and which can not. But you are claiming it because you are as weak as produce a strong argument, but only weak lies like this. Meanwhile I know you are a fetö member support the Kersti Kaljulaid.
I wonder why does our counter terrorist units let you for you breathe.
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
You clearly proved you are ignorance about modern aviation and was said lie about your drivings. I'm sorry but I must say that, you are one of the dishonest liar ever I saw in this forum. Because I already considered all types of aircrafts. I know very well which one can go 30 hours and which can not. But you are claiming it because you are as weak as produce a strong argument, but only weak lies like this. Meanwhile I know you are a fetö member support the Kersti Kaljulaid.
I wonder why does our counter terrorist units let you for you breathe.
So quit being general and be specific! Which airline claims which direct route is 30 hours. I'm calling you out. Please add the aircraft type if you can
-
Shut up ignorant. There is a slander against us. We have the right to defend us.
So take her your mountains of evidence, and your unified flat earth map. Present the results of centuries of verifiable, repeatable experimentation, and show her how wrong she is.
This is not same thing with horoscouple. I drawed the map by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method; not by looking the stars. But perhaps, she is using stars to understand the flat earth believers!
Except your map is not scientific as it requires some seriously unscientific assumptions! Especially when you ignore all those flights that suggest you are wrong! It is pretty much the definition of "unscientific" when you do that.
As for horoscopes I know little except that my sister used to write them for a newspaper she used to work for. She was quite literally told to make them up by her boss! Of course it's entirely feasible that it was a one off and all the other ones you see are real, but I know what my view is.
Nope. I ignored only companies in the black list. Black listed companies are already dishonest ones providing wrong information for unfair competition. Their unfair competition is their problem, but I can't consider the liars. I detected them by statistically, not by compared with the map.
As for horoscopes;
You can see them in "so called scientific magazines", "media is under control of globist liars" and other sources. If you want, I may bring here a few materials come from many globist sites. But you can't find a source to show I worked a bit about them. Because I am scientific and your sources are the most unscientific ones.
I am unscientific only in your dreams! But your dreams can't change the fact!
The scientific method is not to ignore inconvenient results
You continue to prove your ignorance. There is a term as standard deviation and maximum deviation. values equal to, greater than, or close to the maximum deviation may be neglected. I did it. This is 100% completely scientific method but you can't understand it by looking the stars!
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
You clearly proved you are ignorance about modern aviation and was said lie about your drivings. I'm sorry but I must say that, you are one of the dishonest liar ever I saw in this forum. Because I already considered all types of aircrafts. I know very well which one can go 30 hours and which can not. But you are claiming it because you are as weak as produce a strong argument, but only weak lies like this. Meanwhile I know you are a fetö member support the Kersti Kaljulaid.
I wonder why does our counter terrorist units let you for you breathe.
So quit being general and be specific! Which airline claims which direct route is 30 hours. I'm calling you out. Please add the aircraft type if you can
There is no distance in the earth long than till enough fly for 30 hours.
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
You clearly proved you are ignorance about modern aviation and was said lie about your drivings. I'm sorry but I must say that, you are one of the dishonest liar ever I saw in this forum. Because I already considered all types of aircrafts. I know very well which one can go 30 hours and which can not. But you are claiming it because you are as weak as produce a strong argument, but only weak lies like this. Meanwhile I know you are a fetö member support the Kersti Kaljulaid.
I wonder why does our counter terrorist units let you for you breathe.
So quit being general and be specific! Which airline claims which direct route is 30 hours. I'm calling you out. Please add the aircraft type if you can
There is no distance in the earth long than till enough fly for 30 hours.
Well you are the one that made that claim
-
But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours
Here is your claim, just for reference
-
Nope. I ignored only companies in the black list. Black listed companies are already dishonest ones providing wrong information for unfair competition. Their unfair competition is their problem, but I can't consider the liars. I detected them by statistically, not by compared with the map.
See! You are lying again!
Those airlines are not dishonest and you have no evidence that they are,
so cut your stupid deception and admit that you excluded Southern Hemisphere flights because they would not fit into your own stupid map.
Then it goes on! Again and again you prove that your map is no more than a deception!You continue to prove your ignorance. There is a term as standard deviation and maximum deviation. values equal to, greater than, or close to the maximum deviation may be neglected. I did it. This is 100% completely scientific method but you can't understand it by looking the stars!
You continue to prove your deception. You only used your "standard deviation and maximum deviation" after you threw out "inconvenient flights" - that is ones that will not fit on your flat earth map.
Because you know very well that the correct distances for all flights simply cannot be fitted onto a flat earth, so you have to use deceptive methods to prop up you incorrect earth shape.
Do you wonder that I call you, Brotherhood of the Deceivers, because that's all you are - a deceiver.
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
You clearly proved you are ignorance about modern aviation and was said lie about your drivings. I'm sorry but I must say that, you are one of the dishonest liar ever I saw in this forum. Because I already considered all types of aircrafts. I know very well which one can go 30 hours and which can not. But you are claiming it because you are as weak as produce a strong argument, but only weak lies like this. Meanwhile I know you are a fetö member support the Kersti Kaljulaid.
I wonder why does our counter terrorist units let you for you breathe.
So quit being general and be specific! Which airline claims which direct route is 30 hours. I'm calling you out. Please add the aircraft type if you can
There is no distance in the earth long than till enough fly for 30 hours.
1949
94 hours, 1 minute
https://www.wired.com/2010/03/0302b50-nonstop-circumnavigation/
Drops mic.
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
You clearly proved you are ignorance about modern aviation and was said lie about your drivings. I'm sorry but I must say that, you are one of the dishonest liar ever I saw in this forum. Because I already considered all types of aircrafts. I know very well which one can go 30 hours and which can not. But you are claiming it because you are as weak as produce a strong argument, but only weak lies like this. Meanwhile I know you are a fetö member support the Kersti Kaljulaid.
I wonder why does our counter terrorist units let you for you breathe.
So quit being general and be specific! Which airline claims which direct route is 30 hours. I'm calling you out. Please add the aircraft type if you can
1949
94 hours, 1 minute
https://www.wired.com/2010/03/0302b50-nonstop-circumnavigation/
Drops mic.
;D ;D ;D
1 shoot and two goals.
Disproving cahaya and proving dishonesty of Here to laugh at you.
-
Map is true. Map is the true one as how true as a map can be.
The map is rubbish. The map is rubbishy one as a map can be.Do you seriously claim "Map is true. Map is the true one as how true as a map can be" about the map below?
(https://i.hizliresim.com/oOy637.png)
We know for a FACT that aircraft fly from Santiago to Sydney non-stop in about 13 1/2 hours and the distance is under 11,500 km. If you deny that, you are lying again!(https://www.dropbox.com/s/hdrsme5evnljbh9/FlightAware%20-%20Flight%20QFA28%20Santiago%20to%20Sydney%202016-05-11.jpg?dl=1)
FlightAware - Flight QFA28 Santiago to Sydney 2016-05-11
Try fitting that of your silly deceptive map!
Mr Brotherhood of the Dome both you and your map are total jokes!
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
You clearly proved you are ignorance about modern aviation and was said lie about your drivings. I'm sorry but I must say that, you are one of the dishonest liar ever I saw in this forum. Because I already considered all types of aircrafts. I know very well which one can go 30 hours and which can not. But you are claiming it because you are as weak as produce a strong argument, but only weak lies like this. Meanwhile I know you are a fetö member support the Kersti Kaljulaid.
I wonder why does our counter terrorist units let you for you breathe.
So quit being general and be specific! Which airline claims which direct route is 30 hours. I'm calling you out. Please add the aircraft type if you can
1949
94 hours, 1 minute
https://www.wired.com/2010/03/0302b50-nonstop-circumnavigation/
Drops mic.
;D ;D ;D
1 shoot and two goals.
Disproving cahaya and proving dishonesty of Here to laugh at you.
One shoot and it's yourself in the foot. Modern airline, scheduled flight. That's what you claimed. Now please provide that information. Hint, I know you ca t and must deflect again
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
You clearly proved you are ignorance about modern aviation and was said lie about your drivings. I'm sorry but I must say that, you are one of the dishonest liar ever I saw in this forum. Because I already considered all types of aircrafts. I know very well which one can go 30 hours and which can not. But you are claiming it because you are as weak as produce a strong argument, but only weak lies like this. Meanwhile I know you are a fetö member support the Kersti Kaljulaid.
I wonder why does our counter terrorist units let you for you breathe.
So quit being general and be specific! Which airline claims which direct route is 30 hours. I'm calling you out. Please add the aircraft type if you can
1949
94 hours, 1 minute
https://www.wired.com/2010/03/0302b50-nonstop-circumnavigation/
Drops mic.
;D ;D ;D
1 shoot and two goals.
Disproving cahaya and proving dishonesty of Here to laugh at you.
One shoot and it's yourself in the foot. Modern airline, scheduled flight. That's what you claimed. Now please provide that information. Hint, I know you ca t and must deflect again
You missunderstood like everytime. I did not write it as "direct flight". I typed "direct route". These are different. Direct route but indirect flight. Oh, you may don't know this because you are the most ignorant bot here.
-
Unless you can indicate the EXACT speed, at every point, in every single flight, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
If you "blacklist" evidence that doesn't fit your preconceptions, you are NOT using any form of scientific method.
Your map is shit.
Nope. I blacklisted them by inconsistency with the other values. There is a term as consistency. For example, I'm a consist man, constantly defend the flat earth theory. But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours", it is clear it is a lie and I'm taking them in black list. You may claim "Hey come ooon , I went there in 8 hours", but you are a liar as how that aircraft company.
My map is not shit but you are so.
But you clearly demonstrate that you have no knowledge of modern aviation. That can't be gained by looking at Flight Radar 24 and leaping to random conclusions. So which direct route do some airlines claim as 8 hours when others claim 30 hours? Hint, no modern commercial jet claims to be able to fly for 30 hours continuously
You clearly proved you are ignorance about modern aviation and was said lie about your drivings. I'm sorry but I must say that, you are one of the dishonest liar ever I saw in this forum. Because I already considered all types of aircrafts. I know very well which one can go 30 hours and which can not. But you are claiming it because you are as weak as produce a strong argument, but only weak lies like this. Meanwhile I know you are a fetö member support the Kersti Kaljulaid.
I wonder why does our counter terrorist units let you for you breathe.
So quit being general and be specific! Which airline claims which direct route is 30 hours. I'm calling you out. Please add the aircraft type if you can
1949
94 hours, 1 minute
https://www.wired.com/2010/03/0302b50-nonstop-circumnavigation/
Drops mic.
;D ;D ;D
1 shoot and two goals.
Disproving cahaya and proving dishonesty of Here to laugh at you.
One shoot and it's yourself in the foot. Modern airline, scheduled flight. That's what you claimed. Now please provide that information. Hint, I know you ca t and must deflect again
You missunderstood like everytime. I did not write it as "direct flight". I typed "direct route". These are different. Direct route but indirect flight. Oh, you may don't know this because you are the most ignorant bot here.
But while some aircraft companies claim a route as 30 hours; if anotone claim it as "8 hours
So your point is irrelevant then! It seems you've been caught out in an obvious lie and are desperately back-pedalling. If you are lying about this then everything else you say must be considered in that light
-
This is not same thing with horoscouple. I drawed the map by considering the flight times and speed by statistically as a scientific method; not by looking the stars. But perhaps, she is using stars to understand the flat earth believers!
Mr Brotherhood of the Dome, why do you tell outright lies in every post? I know for a fact that you do and you cannot deny it!
I know and will swear in any court of law if required to that I do not have any alts.
Yet in every signature or yours, you lyingly claim that I am sickinoz and that JackBlack and sokarul are my alts!
(http://i68.tinypic.com/2wf4c37.png)
So I know that you lie in your signature and if you lie so openly there I must assume that all of your posts are lies!
Goodbye, you useless liar.
This is exactly what an AI bot would say, knowing full well that a bot cannot be taken to court.
-
May God damn that president son of whore bitch to infinitive.
.... yeah, where she can be made to preach from the pulpit for eternity about verbs to the gathered conjugation.
-
This is exactly what an AI bot would say, knowing full well that a bot cannot be taken to court.
And can a little lambie-in-booties be taken to court for continual innuendo and slander?(https://i.imgur.com/x10gp.gif)
-
May God damn that president son of whore bitch to infinitive.
A cartoon from N30.
(https://i.imgur.com/Jm4hkrUl.jpg)