I've heard you say that there is no exact measurement of where the Karman Line is. This is your first lie you're caught in, Liar.
In order for it to be a lie they are caught in, you need to show what they actually said.
As you didn't, you have not caught them in a lie.
At 161,479 altitude they show the Earth leaving a ball, meaning it is outside Earth proper.
No, it doesn't.
Again, this shows you fail to understand what you are looking at.
Perhaps because you have played too many games where the atmosphere stays until you leave and go to space and then it fades all at once?
Instead of reality, where it is gradual.
At around 233,437, they tell us the Zero-G started happening. We're supposed to not be in Earth's atmosphere, but in space proper.
No, they aren't.
Zero-g is not space.
Zero-g is free fall.
You can be in zero-g inside the atmosphere.
The Vomit Comet does that quite frequently.
Yet again, you are lying.
You appear to have established a complete fantasy for yourself, where below the Karman line you are in Earth's atmosphere and it is perfectly blue and there is no possibility of 0-g; then when you go outside, you magically switch to a black sky of space with 0-g.
That might be how it works in some games, but not in reality.
I guess that also means you think every photo of night that shows a black sky is fake because it is pretending to be outside Earth rather than showing the blue atmosphere?
The same one you said was arbitrary number even though other numbers are clearly not arbitrary?
Some numbers (like the Karman Line) are arbitrary. Effectively arbitrary lines drawn in the sand.
Other numbers, like pi, are not arbitrary and instead are based upon facts about reality.
All of this nonsense is ahead of where it should be.
No, it is ahead of where you want it to be.
Well, it actually zeroes out but it keeps climbing. Then you can clearly see an "oops there", as they raise the speed.
By you, yes.
If you watch it frame by frame, they reach 351 185 ft, and then the speed drops to 0.
When the speed is at 0, the altitude does not continue to increase.
The speed then starts to climb again as the craft starts to descend.
But now, it's fixed in altitude but continuing to speed up. This only makes sense if it turns in place. But the sudden acceleration means it is actually impossible for it to be exactly that altitude.
No altitude is exact. They reported it to the nearest ft.
Considering you like archaic units, that is equivalent to the nearest 36 barelycorns.
So it could change by just less than that and still be reported as that same altitude.
From the time it hits a non zero speed to the time the altitude decreases, is 6 frames. At 30 frames per second, that is roughly 0.2 seconds. At 5 miles per hour, the top speed reached, do you know how far you go in 0.2 seconds?
5 miles is 26400 ft, and 1 hour is 3600 seconds.
So 5 miles per hour is roughly 7.3 ft per second.
So over 0.2 seconds, that would be ~1.5 ft.
But even more damning, did you bother to read? Clearly not.
Here is a simple comparison for you:
Notice the diference?
Any honest person that was so intent on showing problems with this footage would.
But lying people like you just ignore it.
In the first case, it is showing the altitude, which changes it moves.
Then, it shows the apogee, i.e. the maximum altitude.
But you go and lie and pretend this apogee is the current altitude to pretend it is a problem that the apogee doesn't change when the rocket is falling.
So again, you have demonstrated you will look for anything you can pretend is wrong, rather than actually thinking; or thinking of ways you can lie to pretend there are problems.
It certainly demonstrates a complete lack of any honest analysis.
meaning that picture we saw earlier where it just left the ball of Earth? That should be now.
Again, this is reality, where it is a gradual transition. It is not a video game where you reach a magical barrier and switch to space.
Here, both 388 mph and 341,859 are fixed without clear explanation.
You have been provided a clear explanation.
Unlike your delusional BS where these numbers are all fake, the numbers are coming from the booster itself, and there is an issue with the telemetry.
Again, your idea is insane.
If it was all fake, why would they have done that?
Real objects like that need propulsion or the top-heavy part flips the thing over.
Great job showing you fail to understand the aerodynamics of a rocket.
First, why do you say it is top heavy?
Are you appealing to the bit at the top which would increase drag and make it lag behind?
Only at abouut 9:01 do they realize this, and turn on the ignition.
No, at this point they ignite the booster to slow the descent for its propulsive landing.
Zero-G? Obviously they didn't rely on gravity to get them down there.
And again you show either a complete lack of understanding or that you are happy to lie to everyone.
Again, zero-g is free fall.
It doesn't mean gravity is magically switched off.
then digs a hole to -34. Then we instead see a number while it's just sitting here.
Again demonstrating that it is quite likely real.
And have you bothered looking at the launch site and landing site?
It starts out on a platform, and lands on the ground.
What is the elevation difference between them?
But again, if it was fake, and it was meant to finish at 0, why wouldn't it just finish at 0? What would cause it to go to a negative number?
It turns out they are focusing on the pod which is coming down too, honest!
As clearly indicated by the text you wish to ignore.
Uncut, my ass.
And that is pretty much the only thing you have said which is correct.
Yes, I analyzed this before.
And you repeated the same lies before and had them refuted before.
How can I dismiss all the space pictures? Rather easily.
Yes, because you don't care about the truth at all.
If something doesn't match your fantasy, you dismiss it.