The moon landings look like CGI to you? They look corny and crude today, being 60’s sci fi effects look like crap today.
They used the effects of the day, now they look brutally crude.
Used wires for jumping on the moons 1/6 gravity, how did they ever know that before going there and walking on the moon, but I guess they just knew everything about the moon before going there!
The first films of Apollo 11 were slowed to 50% of actual speed.
But the other missions footage was only slowed down by one third speed, for some reason.
After Apollo 11, we had movie cameras with half speed settings on them. So they changed it to 1/3 speed for the next footage of their other missions. Our cameras didn’t have that speed setting back then, only producers had it.
Andy Warhol made a film entirely at one third speed a bit earlier on. NASA used that speed after Apollo 11 and every other mission.
They decided to change the speed fearing it would be found out by us, I think, no other reason to do it.
But they made a huge mistake. It’s easy to compare the Apollo 11 footage speed to the others, it is clearly at slower speed than the others are at.
Watch how they are moving their arms and hands, how they walk or jump up, it’s not the same speed, clearly.
I’m sure you’ll say they look the same speed, it’s very obvious it’s faster in the other footage.
Look closely at how their arms and hands move in Apollo 11 footage, compared to the other footage.
Then speed them both up to twice that speed. The result is amazingly funny.
Apollo 11 footage at twice the speed looks normal speed, because it is at normal speed again.
But the other footage was only slowed down by a third, not by half, so they look like a Benny Hill skit at high speeds moving around here. It’s hilarious to see it.
That shows they are at different speeds, and nothing can excuse it or hope it disappears as an issue.