Alrighty, can someone actually post the theory?
Not really, because the theory has to be totally fluid to give the appearance of validity. The vessels have to be enormous when confronted with the fact that these dinosaurs would have needed gigantic boats to carry enormous dinosaurs and their food. Then the boats have to become small when confronted with the enormity of the task of making such huge boats, which not even us, with all our technology, can build out of wood.
The tools have to be simple and wooden when arguing that a dinosaur or a bird could have made it, and then have to become incredibly sophisticated when arguing that a big boat was done with them. And then they have to become simple again when arguing that every single piece of their technology rotted and disappeared.
They have not accepted that a technologically advanced culture is needed to make these large boats, and that this would mean having complete cities that also magically disappeared.
So, the answer is the same as with FET: you do not have one theory that explains most evidence, you have a myriad small theories that explain each single piece of evidence (in this case, each single piece of missing evidence), and which contradict each other.
They have also failed to show why my theory, by which the aliens from Alpha Centauri came and moved the dinosaurs and flora over the oceans, is
not any better than their patchwork of theories. At least mine covers all bases with just one theory. (Of course my preferred theory is what real science tells us).
Edit: added bolded "not" to correct typo