James's theory on dinosaurs

Quote from: Crustinator on May 05, 2011, 03:26:24 PM

Quote from: Ali on May 05, 2011, 01:04:45 AM

Quote from: Crustinator on May 04, 2011, 06:21:51 PM

Quote from: Ali on May 04, 2011, 03:44:35 PM

Given the lack of available shell casing evidence, I certainly am. Dinosaurs tiny forelimbs wouldn't have been able to cope with teh recoil anyway, that's why they stuck with single shot rifles.

Shell casing would disintegrate over the thousands of years since dinosaurs sailed the earth.

What if dinosaurs used titanium shell casings?

Why bother?

For an increase in penetrative ability against thick hides? Just a shot in the dark.

How would the shell casing affect the penatrative ability?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

because they can contain a larger blast, thus increasing the projectiles velocity over softer casings

inb4 conspiracy or fake

James is respected for his brilliance and for how he can apply that brilliance to making us all more knowledgeable. 

Take the time to read and learn and you will be all the wiser for time better spent. Make sure that thinking is part of your regimen and you will understand.

James makes stuff up after watching too much Flintstones and Jim Henson.

Quote from: gotham on May 08, 2011, 06:34:13 AM

James is respected for his brilliance and for how he can apply that brilliance to making us all more knowledgeable. 

Take the time to read and learn and you will be all the wiser for time better spent. Make sure that thinking is part of your regimen and you will understand.

James makes stuff up after watching too much Flintstones and Jim Henson.

Ah, a typical Ali "debunking!"  This will be your last warning against the low-content posts before a ban is issued.

Feel free. You're entirely incapable of answering legitimate questions anyway. I take it you tend to ban people when they come across gigantic holes in your argument? See "magnetospehere", "solar wind", "event horizon" and "redshift" in your search facility.

I reject the globular-chauvanist terminology of the word Magnetosphere.

Would you prefer "Magnetosaurus"?

I reject the globular-chauvanist terminology of the word Magnetosphere.

they say the empty can rattles the most

Would you prefer "Magnetosaurus"?

they say the empty can rattles the most

This is your last warning before we issue a ban;  stop with the contentless crap posts in the upper forums.  

Feel free. We've shot gigantic hole sin your theory which no-one will answer so there doesn't seem much point in having a forum with a Q&A or Debate section because no regulars seem capable of either, just a bunch of semantic arguing and "use the search function" posts.

Feel free. We've shot gigantic hole sin your theory which no-one will answer so there doesn't seem much point in having a forum with a Q&A or Debate section because no regulars seem capable of either, just a bunch of semantic arguing and "use the search function" posts.

You've really done no such thing.  Unfortunately.  I would welcome you to actually put gigantic holes in my theory.  I have no will to ban you; if I did you would already be gone. If you think you actually put any holes in our theory, you clearly aren't reading the same threads you are posting in.

Now, please quite derailing this topic again. Again, this is a warning.

Warn away John, but at least have the decency to try and answer my questions on UA, time dilation and the apparent lack of redshift and an event horizon, not to mention the absurdity of the moon and sun being able to circle (not orbit) a non gravitational body. Or even how that body doesn't possess gravity when it's 30,000 km across and 9,000km deep and very obviously possesses mass. Do it in the threads the questions were asked in by all means, before they were derailed by your cohorts who keep trying to wrap arguments up in ridiculous nitpicking. You seem to be the only one here with any genuine knowledge and the only one prepared to at least try and answer them. As for derailing the thread, didn't that happen on page 1?

Quote from: Ali on May 10, 2011, 06:42:38 AM

Would you prefer "Magnetosaurus"?

Quote from: john_hand on May 10, 2011, 07:00:40 AM

they say the empty can rattles the most

This is your last warning before we issue a ban;  stop with the contentless crap posts in the upper forums.  

There are many on this forum that wonder when that warning will be issued to James.

Warn away John, but at least have the decency to try and answer my questions on UA, time dilation and the apparent lack of redshift and an event horizon, not to mention the absurdity of the moon and sun being able to circle (not orbit) a non gravitational body. Or even how that body doesn't possess gravity when it's 30,000 km across and 9,000km deep and very obviously possesses mass.

These have nothing to do with this thread.

the answers are just the same though, aren't they? it's like a someone who says they can fly, and when you ask them to, they say they can't be bothered, or they don't want to. Just answer him and maybe then you'll not be bothered by him asking all the time, no?

Quote from: Ali on May 10, 2011, 08:19:56 AM

Warn away John, but at least have the decency to try and answer my questions on UA, time dilation and the apparent lack of redshift and an event horizon, not to mention the absurdity of the moon and sun being able to circle (not orbit) a non gravitational body. Or even how that body doesn't possess gravity when it's 30,000 km across and 9,000km deep and very obviously possesses mass.

These have nothing to do with this thread.

Hence:

Do it in the threads the questions were asked in by all means

I see you have nothing to offer bar semantics again.

Just answer him and maybe then you'll not be bothered by him asking all the time, no?

And we stated that we would. This thread however, is not about the subjects he is talking about.

Quote from: John Davis on May 10, 2011, 07:58:29 AM

Quote from: Ali on May 10, 2011, 06:42:38 AM

Would you prefer "Magnetosaurus"?

Quote from: john_hand on May 10, 2011, 07:00:40 AM

they say the empty can rattles the most

This is your last warning before we issue a ban;  stop with the contentless crap posts in the upper forums.  

There are many on this forum that wonder when that warning will be issued to James.

Do not make off-topic or low-content posts in the upper forums, or I will have no choice but to issue you with a ban.

Quote from: Horatio on May 10, 2011, 09:27:53 AM

Quote from: John Davis on May 10, 2011, 07:58:29 AM

Quote from: Ali on May 10, 2011, 06:42:38 AM

Would you prefer "Magnetosaurus"?

Quote from: john_hand on May 10, 2011, 07:00:40 AM

they say the empty can rattles the most

This is your last warning before we issue a ban;  stop with the contentless crap posts in the upper forums.  

There are many on this forum that wonder when that warning will be issued to James.

Do not make off-topic or low-content posts in the upper forums, or I will have no choice but to issue you with a ban.

It was not low-content or off-topic. It was a valid question related to your postings in this thread.

Quote from: James on May 10, 2011, 11:43:21 AM

Quote from: Horatio on May 10, 2011, 09:27:53 AM

Quote from: John Davis on May 10, 2011, 07:58:29 AM

Quote from: Ali on May 10, 2011, 06:42:38 AM

Would you prefer "Magnetosaurus"?

Quote from: john_hand on May 10, 2011, 07:00:40 AM

they say the empty can rattles the most

This is your last warning before we issue a ban;  stop with the contentless crap posts in the upper forums.  

There are many on this forum that wonder when that warning will be issued to James.

Do not make off-topic or low-content posts in the upper forums, or I will have no choice but to issue you with a ban.

It was not low-content or off-topic. It was a valid question related to your postings in this thread.

As you know, do not dispute moderationor post off topic within the thread; I wouldn't be surprised if James banned you for this.

I would welcome you to actually put gigantic holes in my theory.

Unfortunately, that can be rather difficult seeing as you haven't actually published your theory yet. 

I bet there is empirical evidence that it exists though

ZOMGFFSWTF!!!111!! James is RIGHT:



I have observed it and experienced it twice, no less, so it's repeatable as well! By FE logic, that's empirical evidence right there!

ZOMGFFSWTF!!!111!! James is RIGHT:



I have observed it and experienced it twice, no less, so it's repeatable as well! By FE logic, that's empirical evidence right there!

See you in three days... Sigh.

Quote from: Ali on May 11, 2011, 01:14:06 AM

ZOMGFFSWTF!!!111!! James is RIGHT:



I have observed it and experienced it twice, no less, so it's repeatable as well! By FE logic, that's empirical evidence right there!

See you in three days... Sigh.

I fail to see the difference between someone using that particular youtube video as evidence and James claiming dreams as evidence.

Quote from: John Davis on May 11, 2011, 01:33:07 PM

Quote from: Ali on May 11, 2011, 01:14:06 AM

ZOMGFFSWTF!!!111!! James is RIGHT:



I have observed it and experienced it twice, no less, so it's repeatable as well! By FE logic, that's empirical evidence right there!

See you in three days... Sigh.

I fail to see the difference between someone using that particular youtube video as evidence and James claiming dreams as evidence.

IF you wish to discuss or contest a ban, please do so in the appropriate forum.  I'm sick of having to say this.

However, he was clearly not using that video as evidence, and you know it.

Upon consideration of recently submitted evidence, I have to conclude that James was right about dinosaurs.



I am sure James will agree when I say that the TV series shown in the link above was likely created by disenchanted members of the conspiracy as a way to help soften the blow on humanity when the truth is finally revealed or, more likely, exposed.  Indeed, the content of the infamous finale of the show gives us insight into the views of those disenchanted members of the conspiracy and the concern that they have for the future of humanity and our world.

Upon consideration of recently submitted evidence, I have to conclude that James was right about dinosaurs.



I am sure James will agree when I say that the TV series shown in the link above was likely created by disenchanted members of the conspiracy as a way to help soften the blow on humanity when the truth is finally revealed or, more likely, exposed.  Indeed, the content of the infamous finale of the show gives us insight into the views of those disenchanted members of the conspiracy and the concern that they have for the future of humanity and our world.

Enjoy your 3 day ban for being a jackass.  Do you really think we are stupid enough to think you aren't trying to use your post as some sort of soapbox to whine about the previous ban?  

Let's be absolutely clear: any further posts in this thread which violate the forum or board-specific rules will result in a ban. Those rules are very clear:

Update. In this forum, off-topic posting is against the rules. If a moderator feels that a thread has strayed from its original point to an unacceptable degree, and tells people to get back on-topic, this is not an invitation to discuss the matter further, nor is it just a suggestion. At that point, all off-topic discussion either ceases, or members involved in further off-topic discussion will receive a suspension. This is part of the Forum Rules anyway, but it is strictly enforced Flat Earth Debate. Take heed.


I'm bringing this up because I see a lot of members ignoring and even disputing instructions from moderators to stay on-topic, often dragging the thread even further off-topic. This cannot continue. From now on I will be suspending people without warning for such behaviour, for a week or more, depending (frankly) on how I feel about it. I encourage other moderators to do the same.


By the point such a suspension takes place, you've already been asked to stick to the point under discussion, so you have no excuse. I see a lot of regulars who have been here long enough to know better doing this kind of stuff, and it's getting tiresome. To newcomers who may get caught on the wrong side of this rule because they didn't read this thread, all I can say is ignorantia legis neminem excusat- the rules apply whether you've read them or not.

I am going to be really strict about this from now on, and I encourage all the other mods to ban immediately for any further infractions. This topic is about "James' theory on dinosaurs", and that is the only legitimate subject for debate. Moreover, it is expected that those involved in the debate adhere to the forum and board-specific rules. You have all had fair warning.

Do the dinosaurs have contact with the moonshrimp? There old civilized society must have attempted to make a telepathic link with them, did they succeed and if so, has the younger generation of dinosaurs maintained that link?

These are important questions, we might be able to learn more of dinosaur migrations by looking at the moonshrimp migrations.