James's theory on dinosaurs

Quote from: Horatio on May 10, 2011, 09:27:53 AM

Quote from: John Davis on May 10, 2011, 07:58:29 AM

Quote from: Ali on May 10, 2011, 06:42:38 AM

Would you prefer "Magnetosaurus"?

Quote from: john_hand on May 10, 2011, 07:00:40 AM

they say the empty can rattles the most

This is your last warning before we issue a ban;  stop with the contentless crap posts in the upper forums.  

There are many on this forum that wonder when that warning will be issued to James.

Do not make off-topic or low-content posts in the upper forums, or I will have no choice but to issue you with a ban.

Quote from: James on May 10, 2011, 11:43:21 AM

Quote from: Horatio on May 10, 2011, 09:27:53 AM

Quote from: John Davis on May 10, 2011, 07:58:29 AM

Quote from: Ali on May 10, 2011, 06:42:38 AM

Would you prefer "Magnetosaurus"?

Quote from: john_hand on May 10, 2011, 07:00:40 AM

they say the empty can rattles the most

This is your last warning before we issue a ban;  stop with the contentless crap posts in the upper forums.  

There are many on this forum that wonder when that warning will be issued to James.

Do not make off-topic or low-content posts in the upper forums, or I will have no choice but to issue you with a ban.

It was not low-content or off-topic. It was a valid question related to your postings in this thread.

I would welcome you to actually put gigantic holes in my theory.

ZOMGFFSWTF!!!111!! James is RIGHT:



I have observed it and experienced it twice, no less, so it's repeatable as well! By FE logic, that's empirical evidence right there!

Quote from: Ali on May 11, 2011, 01:14:06 AM

ZOMGFFSWTF!!!111!! James is RIGHT:



I have observed it and experienced it twice, no less, so it's repeatable as well! By FE logic, that's empirical evidence right there!

See you in three days... Sigh.

Quote from: John Davis on May 11, 2011, 01:33:07 PM

Quote from: Ali on May 11, 2011, 01:14:06 AM

ZOMGFFSWTF!!!111!! James is RIGHT:



I have observed it and experienced it twice, no less, so it's repeatable as well! By FE logic, that's empirical evidence right there!

See you in three days... Sigh.

I fail to see the difference between someone using that particular youtube video as evidence and James claiming dreams as evidence.

Upon consideration of recently submitted evidence, I have to conclude that James was right about dinosaurs.



I am sure James will agree when I say that the TV series shown in the link above was likely created by disenchanted members of the conspiracy as a way to help soften the blow on humanity when the truth is finally revealed or, more likely, exposed.  Indeed, the content of the infamous finale of the show gives us insight into the views of those disenchanted members of the conspiracy and the concern that they have for the future of humanity and our world.

Update. In this forum, off-topic posting is against the rules. If a moderator feels that a thread has strayed from its original point to an unacceptable degree, and tells people to get back on-topic, this is not an invitation to discuss the matter further, nor is it just a suggestion. At that point, all off-topic discussion either ceases, or members involved in further off-topic discussion will receive a suspension. This is part of the Forum Rules anyway, but it is strictly enforced Flat Earth Debate. Take heed.


I'm bringing this up because I see a lot of members ignoring and even disputing instructions from moderators to stay on-topic, often dragging the thread even further off-topic. This cannot continue. From now on I will be suspending people without warning for such behaviour, for a week or more, depending (frankly) on how I feel about it. I encourage other moderators to do the same.


By the point such a suspension takes place, you've already been asked to stick to the point under discussion, so you have no excuse. I see a lot of regulars who have been here long enough to know better doing this kind of stuff, and it's getting tiresome. To newcomers who may get caught on the wrong side of this rule because they didn't read this thread, all I can say is ignorantia legis neminem excusat- the rules apply whether you've read them or not.

Do the dinosaurs have contact with the moonshrimp? There old civilized society must have attempted to make a telepathic link with them, did they succeed and if so, has the younger generation of dinosaurs maintained that link?

These are important questions, we might be able to learn more of dinosaur migrations by looking at the moonshrimp migrations.

Quote from: Beorn on May 14, 2011, 07:42:09 AM

Do the dinosaurs have contact with the moonshrimp? There old civilized society must have attempted to make a telepathic link with them, did they succeed and if so, has the younger generation of dinosaurs maintained that link?

These are important questions, we might be able to learn more of dinosaur migrations by looking at the moonshrimp migrations.

No dinosaurs would have messed with moonshrimp. See the moonshrimp would eat some algae and start glowing and scare the dinosaurs away. I mean shit if a Moonbat wont fuck with a glowing moonshrimp then why the hell would a big ass dinosaur fuck with it?
Highly unlikely. Just look at the way whales consume plankton. Dinosaurs would probably behave in the same way, except that they would use nets off the size of their galleons to capture the moon shrimp.

Besides, it is archaelogically recognised that proto-moon shrimp left the earth long before dinosaurs arrived on the earth.

I recall a claim made that dinosaurs did not possess simple or complex building abilities. I have searched the internet and the site and can not locate sources of information backing up that claim.

Quote from: gotham on July 09, 2011, 02:35:06 PM

I recall a claim made that dinosaurs did not possess simple or complex building abilities. I have searched the internet and the site and can not locate sources of information backing up that claim.

That's funny, I seem to recall a claim made that dinosaurs did possess the ability to build vast armadas of ocean sailing ships used for colonization purposes, but I've been unable to find any evidence backing up that claim either.

If dinosaurs were to be considered intelligent, there would not be much limit to their capability.

But dinosaurs did build ships.

But they had to destroy them. Because when they got to America there might be cowards that wanted to go home. Also they needed the wood for building new houses. It makes sense to me. Why would you keep a boat you didn't need any more?

We are talking about Dinosaur Colonisation here. There was undoubtedly a lot of politics and power play going on. When the colonisers saw the desolate new world they had been instructed to inhabit by their much hated autocratic government it would have been tempting to try and hop back on the boat to the old civilisation. The Navy had to make sure that didn't happen, while at the same time giving the settlers as much encouragement as possible in terms of materials + livestock.

That is some excellent fiction writing Crusty.

Quote from: Crustinator on July 10, 2011, 08:34:45 AM

We are talking about Dinosaur Colonisation here. There was undoubtedly a lot of politics and power play going on. When the colonisers saw the desolate new world they had been instructed to inhabit by their much hated autocratic government it would have been tempting to try and hop back on the boat to the old civilisation. The Navy had to make sure that didn't happen, while at the same time giving the settlers as much encouragement as possible in terms of materials + livestock.

Excellent post, Dr Crustinator. Is it a part of your Dinosaurs Essay that is going to be released soon?

Quote from: Crustinator on July 10, 2011, 05:27:55 AM

But dinosaurs did build ships.

But they had to destroy them. Because when they got to America there might be cowards that wanted to go home. Also they needed the wood for building new houses. It makes sense to me. Why would you keep a boat you didn't need any more?

Wouldn't it be easier (and more profitable) just to sail the ship back (preferably loaded with exotic goods) and pick up more paying customers?

Quote from: markjo on July 10, 2011, 08:26:00 AM

Quote from: Crustinator on July 10, 2011, 05:27:55 AM

But dinosaurs did build ships.

But they had to destroy them. Because when they got to America there might be cowards that wanted to go home. Also they needed the wood for building new houses. It makes sense to me. Why would you keep a boat you didn't need any more?

Wouldn't it be easier (and more profitable) just to sail the ship back (preferably loaded with exotic goods) and pick up more paying customers?

I am confused,  why did the dinosaurs build ships?  They could have easily been given rides from aliens who were busy covering the planet in pyramids?

Quote from: Felix (R) on July 09, 2011, 03:14:34 PM

If dinosaurs were to be considered intelligent, there would not be much limit to their capability.

Except for their bio-mechanical limitations.  Intelligence doesn't do a species much good if they don't have the dexterity and range of motion to make and use sophisticated tools and structures (such as ships).