There isn't that much to align. In a round Earth, the sun and moon only have to be on opposite sides of each other., and in full moon. Provided the sun and moon are not in position to be up at the same time, you have a fairly fixed lineup, I would say.
And like many things you say, that is pure BS.
There are several key motions.
1 - The orbit of Earth around the sun, which is confined to a plane. This plane confines any line from the sun, passing through Earth to this plane, or close to it.
2 - The orbit of the moon around Earth, which is confined to a plane. This plane confines any line passing through the Earth and moon to this plane or close to it.
What you need are the 2 lines described to align.
Now, from a top down view, that is every full moon.
But from a side view, that is not.
Ignoring the entire issue of penumbra vs umbra, etc, and just projecting the Earth's shape directly back, all the way to the moon, you have a circle of radius 6371 km, at a distance of between 350 000 to 400 000 km.
Using the closer number (which is actually closer than the moon) you get an angle of 1 degree. i.e. if it is out of alignment by 1 degree, it misses.
As a comparison, the moon's orbit is inclined by 5.145 degrees.
Notice how that isn't small enough?
Here is the full math:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=91511.msg2395249#msg2395249Again, this has been explained to you before. Yet here you are playing dumb.
And notice how even then you still fail to explain why it should be every day.
Appealing to the "opposite sides of each other" only gets you every full moon, not every day.
Care to show some honesty and admit that statement of yours was pure BS?
In a FE, on the other hand, the sun and moon have to literally block each other. This is somewhat more of a challenge
You could say that.
How are the sun and moon meant to block each other when they are literally opposite each other?
It is so much more of a challenge that you can't explain it at all.
In your fantasy there is no reason for a lunar eclipse at all.
The moon is casting a shadow with its darkside on the sun.
You are drawing the moon on the far side of the sun.
That means the side of the moon closest to us would appear fully illuminated.
That is a full moon.
The dark side of the moon is facing away from us.
And as nothing is blocking the light of the sun from reaching us, there is no eclipse.
Solar eclipse happens during a new moon, lunar eclipse during the full moon.
Yes, when either the moon blocks the light from the sun going to Earth, or Earth blocks the light of the sun going to the moon.
Because you "know" the sun is much bigger than the moon.
For many reasons already explained to you.
But no, because the shadow is defined by the lines running tangent to both the sun and moon.
But no, the model is showing the moon and ssun being mostly the same size
So you tried to draw your FE fantasy, with a RE?
I could draw this diagram again.
Don't bother.
Provide the numbers instead.
What is the altitude of the sun and moon?
What is the radius of the sun and moon?
What is the distance of the sub solar point from the north pole?
What is the distance of the sub lunar point from the north pole?
No, I think it has less to do with some imagined vendetta
It isn't imagined, nor would I really call it a vendetta.
You have demonstrated you cannot accept reality, so you cling to a fantasy and lash out at reality.
But when lashing out, all you can do is repeat the same refuted BS.
the fact that the lunar eclipse model would be no different from viewing a full moon from Tokyo on a night the sun is on the opposite side of Earth. That is, it's the same exact position as a regular full moon.
No, it isn't.
Again, that has already been refuted.
Again, the inclination of the moon's orbit is over 5 degrees.
This is too great a misalignment to be in Earth's shadow ever full moon.
They are NOT the exact same position.
As a very much not to scale diagram:
If the moon is in the dark grey region, entirely, it is a total lunar eclipse.
If it is in the dark grey region partially, it is a partial lunar eclipse.
If it is in the light grey region, it is a penumbral lunar eclipse.
And if it isn't in any, it is just a full moon.
On my model, the moon is backlit, causing a red glow.
No it isn't.
On your model, it is in the position of a new moon, yet illuminated as a full moon.
Also, if I "hated" it as you say, why would I use the model to show the path of eclipse?
Because you are trying to pretend it is wrong.
I don't hate RE.
You certainly seem to.
Using whatever dishonest BS you can to pretend it is wrong, without being able to show a single fault, and repeating the same refuted lies.
I believe you said the same thing about God?
The distinction is the RE model does exist, and actually works; and you need to repeatedly lie about it.
Conversely, there is nothing to show your god exists, and I don't need to lie about it.
But no, lets not go off on yet another pathetic religious tangent of yours so you can flee from your complete inability to defend your lies about the RE.
How about instead of that pathetic tangent you own up and admit you have been lying this entire time. Or try to defend your dishonest BS.