All of you, the RE, should change your names to Idi-Amin. The British and the American diplomats had left the country. The only embassy representatives left were the Soviets and Amin had a quarrel with them. So they headed for the airport to leave the country as well. At that point, Amin's only advisor told him: "you can't affort to let the Russian leave, they'd be no one left". So Amin grabbed a broken harmonica, and took the jeep to the airport. Just as the Soviet delegation was about to board the plane, Amin started to play a well-known russian folksong with that harmonica.
You, the RE, are in a similar situation.
You, the RE, are denying (calling them "delusional BS") your very best RE physicists.
The final conclusion reached by these famous physicists is this: gravity is described by emissive/receptive gravitons, which emit/absorb aether through wormholes, and these gravitons are quantum entangled.
The only stable wormhole is an aether absorbing wormhole.
Here are the bibliographical references, read for yourselves:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=92282.msg2418397#msg2418397These are the very best RE physicists, no question about it, and they have finally solved the riddle of gravity: the final conclusion, it is not attractive at all.
So, naturally, we have to wonder about the story we are being told, namely that the Earth has an orbital speed of 29km/s. Then, the quantum entagled gravitons cannot explain how an object at the surface of a sphere (geoid) can adhere to that surface given this speed.
Jura, please give up your failed incursion into heliophysics. What? You do not like the electric sun theory?
Then, explain the CNO paradox: remember, these are the very best RE heliophysicists at work.
CNO CYCLE DEFIES THE SOLAR NUCLEAR FURNACE HYPOTHESIS
An extraordinary look at the CNO cycle:
Observational Confirmation of the Sun's CNO Cycle
https://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0512/0512633.pdf (a must read)
This paper provides the latest proofs which show the following:
Measurements on gamma-rays from a solar flare in Active Region 10039 on 23 July 2002 with the RHESSI spacecraft spectrometer indicate that the CNO cycle occurs at the solar surface, in electrical discharges along closed magnetic loops.
"But the nuclear furnace theory assumes that these nuclear events are separated from surface events by hundreds of thousands of years as the heat from the core slowly percolates through the Sun’s hypothetical “radiative zone”."
A clear debunking of the currently accepted solar model.
"To confirm these surface events Iron Sun proponents point to the telltale signatures of the “CNO cycle” first set forth in the work of Hans Bethe. In 1939 Bethe proposed that the stable mass-12 isotope of Carbon catalyzes a series of atomic reactions in the core of the Sun, resulting in the fusion of hydrogen into helium. This nucleosynthesis, according to Bethe, occurs through a “Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen (CNO) cycle,” as helium is constructed from the nuclei of hydrogen atoms—protons—at temperatures ranging from 14 million K to 20 million K.
For some time now, solar scientists have observed the products expected from the CNO cycle, but now they see a relationship of these products’ abundances to sunspot activity. This finding is crucial because the nuclear events that standard theory envisions are separated from surface events by hundreds of thousands of years as the heat from the core slowly percolates through the Sun’s hypothetical “radiative zone”. From this vantage point, a connection between the hidden nuclear furnace and sunspot activity is inconceivable."
Proponents of the Iron Sun, therefore, have posed an issue that could be fatal to the standard model.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120204044737/http://www.omatumr.com/abstracts2005/The_Suns_Origin.pdfhttps://web.archive.org/web/20080509075056/http://www.omatumr.com/papers.htmlIn his autobiography, “Home Is Where the Wind Blows,” Sir Fred Hoyle documents the abrupt, and seemingly inexplicable U-Turn in astronomy, astrophysics, solar physics immediately after “nuclear fires” ended the Second World War:
[Referring to Hoyle’s meeting with Sir Arthur Eddington one spring day in 1940]: “We both believed that the Sun was made mostly of iron, two parts iron to one part of hydrogen, more or less. The spectrum of sunlight, chock-a-block with lines of iron, had made this belief seem natural to astronomers for more than fifty years.” . . . (page 153)
“The high-iron solution continued to reign supreme in the interim (at any rate, in the astronomical circles to which I was privy) until after the Second World War,” . . .
“when I was able to show, to my surprise, that the high-hydrogen, low iron solution was to be preferred for the interiors as well as for the atmospheres.” (page 153-154)
“My paper on the matter confounded a doctrine of (Raymond) Lyttleton, who used to say there are three stages in the acceptance by the world of a new idea.
1. The idea is nonsense.
2. Somebody thought of it before you did.
3. We believed it all the time.
This matter of the high-hydrogen solution was the only occasion, in my experience, when the first and second of these stages were missing.“ (page 154)
Two other recent papers confirm that the Sun’s energy spectrum varies in the manner expected from a pulsar core that is shielded by turbulent layers of ordinary atomic matter:
_ a.) Judith L. Lean and Matthew T. DeLand, “How Does the Sun’s Spectrum Vary?” Journal of Climate, 25, 2555–2560 (April 2012)
_ b.) C. Martin-Puertas, K. Matthes, A. Brauer, R. Muscheler, F. Hansen, C. Petrick, A. Aldahan, G. Possnert, B. Van Geel, “Regional atmospheric circulation shifts induced by a grand solar minimum,” Nature Geoscience 5 , 397-401 (June 2012)
SOLID SURFACE OF THE SUN paradox.
http://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/index.htmlhttp://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/model.htmhttp://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/sunquakes.htmhttp://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/moss.htmhttp://www.thesurfaceofthesun.com/tsunami.htm?