I thought religion or at least the catholic church played a big role in people's perception that the earth was flat centuries ago. Does no one here argue for a flat earth on religious grounds?
--Ticky
No one does. Perhaps you, and other REers should ponder that, and maybe think about what's being attacked on this site...
Beast is wrong and you were correct. You can get a good idea of the strength of the atheist beast's flat Earth belief by virtue of the fact that after he learned that I believed the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion' are not a forgery, he said he would recant his flat Earth belief if he saw one of the 'core' flat Earthers make a similar statement again.
Both Raa (who is a muslim) and myself (and to some extent Chaltier who does not post as much) believe the Earth is flat based primarily but not exclusıvely on a religious basis. Also, Samuel Rowbotham was a devout protestant who would be considered a 'bible christian' today.
The (Catholic) Church did not believe the Earth was flat.
This statement does not accurately describe Latin Europe before the schism of 1054 after which it came under the influence of the largely sphericist mohammedan philosophers.
Gallileo argued for a Geocentric model rather than a Heliocentric one, but neither were flat Earthers.
If I am not mistaken, cheesejof meant to say that 'Galileo argued for a HELIOCENTRIC model rather than a geocentric one, but neither he nor the papacy of that time were flat Earthers' which is quite true.