This is incorrect.
Autopedophilia ("self" "child" "love" -> to love yourself as a child) consists of diaper-like paraphilia. The conflation of pedophilia fetish is understandable, but not forgivable, because it is easily addressed ignorance.
Much of crossdressing, as I will admit, is autogynephilia ("self" "woman" "love" -> to love yourself as a woman), and as such crossdressers and the like are actually straight with a kink in that they also love women's clothing.
But what about these washed out pastel clothes? Isn't this about infantile humiliation? No, it is not. Nor is it about pedophilia.
This fashion is part of a Japanese style that comes from a single person.

His name is Mana, and he started two clothing trends: elegant gothic and gothic lolita. Mana is part of the Japanese emo punk darkwave band known as Malice Mizer.
Gothic lolita or goth loli is about "cutesy" feminine style, whereas elegant gothic is more of a dark style.
I know this because I am a middling fan of Japanese punk culture.
If you see frills, poofy outfits, short dresses that look archaic, but no diapers, you are not looking at infantilization, this is gothic lolita. For the record, men and women of any age (though I've usually seen 16 to about 38) adopt this style.
Now, the "girl" on the far right is not doing goth loli, that's Alice cosplay (you know, from Alice in Wonderland). Since Lewis Carrol was a bit of a weirdo, I would accept it if you said that leans into pedo fetish. Carrol actually returned a girl who he mistakenly thought was a kiddo but was actually over 18. He was a sick puppy. Here too, though, grown women sometimes dress as Alice.

What disturbs me far more than women (and by extension crossdressing men) trying to look cutesy is when society has everyone emulating men. I first started crossdressing in earnest in about my mid-20s, after serious depression about the maleness of my body. Ironically, my body was less masculine in terms of body hair back then. You know what I noticed while shopping, though? A push away from skirts and dresses and towards trying to get everyone into a sort of masculine look.

Ummmm, if women aren't gonna be womanly, why is it off limits for other people? If I wanna wear this,

society hasn't set clear rules on what do here. I go into the men's room? They penalize me for wearing taboo clothing, sometimes with physical force. I go into the women's room? They evaluate me based on whether I pass or not, and exile me if I didn't. The women's room is less violent. But this choice shouldn't be pushed on me to start with.
Style is just style. Men's style, men's bathrooms, these are recent rules, that people just decided on. There's no concrete system behind them. Some guy called George "Beau" Brummel decided men should wear coat and tie. I have gone back in time and killed him. All men now wear stuff like this.

If we had consistent rules for "dress code doesn't matter, and by law all men are protected from mistreatment" then yes, I'd support restrooms based on biology, and have femboys use the men's restroom. Or "all people use restrooms based on physical appearance, and no masculine-looking people in women's rooms", also cool. Or "we don't have gendered restrooms," also cool.
But we have inconsistent rules, no protections, and no clear guide to behavior. If a femboy goes into either restroom, they worry about a black eye. Or worse.
...You know what? I'm making a poll.