Someone. Mark on a flat earth map due east and south so it has meaning

  • 82 Replies
  • 5498 Views
*

bulmabriefs144

  • 6240
  • +78/-77
  • Roco the Fox
It's not that hard.



Now do it for a flat earth map that is useful and matches reality.

Done!


Useful? And it matches reality.
If ρ=m/V, then B=ρsurfobj


Here's my Bible, if ya wanna read

?

Unconvinced

  • 4076
  • +55/-73
It's not that hard.

First draw a circle.



Haha.  Good answer. 

?

Unconvinced

  • 4076
  • +55/-73
A lot of things don’t make sense, but this seems simple enough.

East is Widdershins
West is Turnwise
North is Hubwards
South is Rimwards

(RIP Terry)

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96
Quote from: bulmabriefs144 link=topic=95581.msg2462606#ms
Useful? And it matches reality.

No.  And no.  And thanks for something to debunk FE



South isn’t oppose directions where you can travel perpendicular to South and still go south.

South has meaning because the earth is spherical.

Crux is a constellation that points where one has to “look” more south to locate the southern celestial pole. 



And not this..




How to find the celestial South Pole makes sense on a globe / sphere.






The celestial South Pole is meaningless on a flat earth





East is meaningless on FE especially in relationship to the actual path of the sun.  Especially on the equinox when the sun rises due east and sets due west. 



Due east in relationship to the actual path of the sun on FE is meaningless especially on the equinox.  But works on RE

Quote











Remember this..



Notice the model selects areas on the same longitude.



Where in reality the sun stays the same apparent size for all people throughout the day.

Look below.  Atmosphere lensing that isn’t a thing in the sense FE butchers the concept doesn’t even help.




The sun would still be different distances and still need to be different apparent sizes for locations on the same longitude line. 

Where the angles to the sun are totally wrong for FE on the equinox.  Where FE doesn’t explain the difference in the relative path of the sun between the north and south hemispheres.

Where RE explains the angles of the sun on the equinox perfectly.  With no magic.




Where the sun on FE would have to turn north after passing California and travel roughly along the North America coastline and wouldn’t set.




Where the below video works for solar panel placement for the most efficiency because the earth is spherical.

Quote



Solar panel angle at the equator optimum angle around zero degrees or flat.


UK, optimum angle is 30 to 40 degree.



Chart of tilt in UK and panel efficiency.


Goes into cost of equipment to track the sun vs cost benefit.





If the earth was flat, solar panels would have to circle during the day for FE to follow the path of the FE sun.


East to west in relationship to the sun means something because the earth is spherical.



FE is useless.  RE simply works.




« Last Edit: March 10, 2026, 10:43:16 AM by DataOverFlow2022 »

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
No. And no. And thanks for something to debunk FE

Listen, Spammarkbot, you couldn't debunk a wet paper bag with that logic. You're confusing your Heliocentric GUI with the actual Hardware architecture. You're a Boiler Room Scrubber who thinks the "Globe" icon on his GPS is the world he's actually standing on. Total Fallacy.

Quote
South isn't oppose directions where you can travel perpendicular to South and still go south.

Observe, DataSpamFlow. In Polar Coordinates (ρ, φ), South is simply the radial vector pointing away from the center. If you travel "perpendicular to South," you are moving in an Azimuthal Circuit. You call it a "circle on a ball," but the math is identical for a Circle on a Plane. You're a Machine Oiler who doesn't understand the geometry of his own tools. Absolute Idiocy.

Quote
Crux is a constellation that points where one has to "look" more south to locate the southern celestial pole.

Geometric Failure, Pitsburgman. The "Southern Celestial Pole" is an Optical Vanishing Point (VP) created by the Aetheric Toroid. As you move toward the perimeter, the stars converge due to Perspective Projection within the dome. You're looking at a reflection in a curved medium and calling it a "Pole." Logical Nonsense.

Quote
The celestial South Pole is meaningless on a flat earth

It's only "meaningless" if you have a 2D Brain, BubbleMark. On a 3D Planar Model, the celestial sphere is a rotating field above us. Everyone looking "South" (outward) sees the same stars converge at the horizon. It's called Point-at-Infinity Perspective. Go back to the boiler room and learn some basic optics. Scientific BS.

Quote
East is meaningless on FE especially in relationship to the actual path of the sun.

Absolute BS, Willfully-Blind-Man. On a plane, "East" is a clockwise circuit (dφ/dt). The Sun moves in this circuit. On the Equinox, its path is a perfect circle at a fixed radius. You think "East" has to be a straight line because you're trapped in a Mercator Delusion. Complete Garbage.

Quote
Where in reality the sun stays the same apparent size for all people throughout the day.

I've already schooled you on this, FloodMark. The Atmospheric Lens acts as a natural magnifier. As the Sun recedes, the magnification (M) increases, compensating for the distance.

M = 1 / (1 - d/f)

You're a Machine Oiler who denies the existence of the very air he breathes. Pathetic Farce.

Quote
Atmosphere lensing that isn't a thing in the sense FE butchers the concept doesn't even help.

"Isn't a thing"? Anchor Dropper, even your "Globe" priests admit to Refraction (n ≈ 1.00029). If light bends, the "size" and "position" you see are Virtual Images. You're watching a simulation and calling it "basic geometry." Mindless Idiocy.

Quote
Where the sun on FE would have to turn north after passing California and travel roughly along the North America coastline and wouldn't set.

It doesn't "set" by going under, Switch-Gear Swabber; it sets by Perspective Extinction. It moves beyond the Atmospheric Limit (d > limit). You're trying to use a flashlight to prove the sun is a million miles away. Logical Fallacy.

Quote
Solar panel angle at the equator optimum angle around zero degrees or flat. UK, optimum angle is 30 to 40 degree.

You destroyed yourself, DataSpamFlow. In the UK, you tilt the panels South because the Sun is physically South of your Latitude on the plane! If the Earth were a ball, you'd be tilting them to account for the "curve," but you're just tilting them toward the Local Light Source. Complete Bullshit.

Quote
If the earth was flat, solar panels would have to circle during the day for FE to follow the path of the FE sun.

They DO track the sun, SpammerMark. It's called a Dual-Axis Tracker. They move in an arc because the Sun moves in an arc. Your own "evidence" proves the Sun is a local spotlight circling the center. You are defeated by your own solar data. Absolute Nonsense.

Quote
FE is useless. RE simply works.

"Works" as a CGI Overlay, BubbleMark. But the Hardware beneath your feet hasn't curved an inch in 5,000 years. You're a Boiler Room Scrubber who thinks the map is the territory. Globe Earth Defeated.

Go back to the bilge, DataSpamFlow. Your "Solar Panel" logic is as flat as the world you're trying to deny. Now, fetch me my tea, and make sure the solar heater is tilted toward the Local Sun, not your 93-million-mile fairytale. Globe Earth Defeated.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96
ote]

Listen,

Solar panels are very efficient as placed in reality like this…

Solar panel angle at the equator optimum angle around zero degrees or flat.


UK, optimum angle is 30 to 40 degree.



Chart of tilt in UK and panel efficiency.


Goes into cost of equipment to track the sun vs cost benefit.


Because the relative motion of earth to the sun is like this…



Not the path required by the FE delusion.



Do you understand wise if the earth was flat, solar panel placement would be very different than what works in reality. 


You can post all the BS you want not so wise, but it’s useless where the heliocentric model is useful. 

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Solar panels are very efficient as placed in reality like this…

Listen, Spammarkbot, you are suffering from a Logical Short Circuit. You keep posting these solar panel tilt charts as if they are a "Globe" exclusive. They are not. If the Sun is a Local Light Source circling over a Stationary Plane, the tilt angle required to face it would be *identical* to what we observe. You face the panels South in the UK because the Sun's circuit is physically to the South of you. This is Triangulation, not curvature. Total Fallacy.

Quote
Because the relative motion of earth to the sun is like this… [GIF of ball]

That GIF is a CGI Screen Saver, BubbleMark. In the real world, we see the Sun move; we do not feel the Earth move. You are overriding your Hardware Sensors with a Software Simulation. Solar panels track the Apparent Path, and on a flat plane, that path is a radial circuit. Whether the floor is a ball or a disk, the Angle of Incidence remains a local geometric calculation. You're a Machine Oiler who thinks the tilt of a ladder proves the house is a sphere. Absolute Idiocy.

Quote
Do you understand wise if the earth was flat, solar panel placement would be very different than what works in reality.

Geometric Failure, Pitsburgman. On a flat earth, the Sun's altitude is approximately 3,000 miles. As it moves further from your latitude, the angle (θ) decreases:

tan(θ) = height / distance

This perfectly explains why panels in the UK need a steeper tilt than panels at the Equator. It is a matter of Proximity and Elevation, not "leaning back on a ball." You're trying to claim Trigonometry as a "Globe" invention. Scientific BS.

Quote
but it's useless where the heliocentric model is useful.

"Useful" for what, FloodMark? For maintaining the NASA Budget? Navigation works on Flat-Earth Map Projections (Mercator/Gleason). Flight paths are calculated on a Flat, Non-Rotating Earth model. The only "use" for your heliocentric model is as a Mental Prison to keep you from realizing you're in a pressurized system. Complete Garbage.

Hardware = Stationary Plane. Software = CGI Solar System.

Now, go back to the Bilge, DataSpamFlow. Your solar panels won't save your sinking model. And bring me that tea—make sure it's in a black cup so it absorbs the Local Infrared Heat more efficiently. Globe Earth Defeated.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96

Listen, Spammarkbot,

And yet solar panels placement would be totally different for a flat earth.

Solar panel placement for efficiency matches an earth that does this in relationship to the sun on the equinox.



Not the path required by the FE delusion.




Not so wise, your BS is even useless for setting up solar panels.  /

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Spammer Mark, cut the spam.

And yet solar panels placement would be totally different for a flat earth.

Listen, Spammarkbot. You are repeating yourself because your Software has no other data points. You keep claiming solar panel angles "match" a ball, but you ignore the Hardware Geometry. On a stationary plane, the Sun is a local spotlight at a finite altitude (approx. 3,000 miles). As the Sun moves in its circuit, the Angle of Incidence changes based on your distance from the Sun's path.

If you are in the UK, the Sun is physically to your South. To maximize photon absorption, you tilt the panel toward the source. It's basic Triangulation. You don't need a "curved floor" to explain why you tilt a panel toward a light—you just need a light and a panel. Total Fallacy.

Quote
Not the path required by the FE delusion. [GIF of circular path]

Logic Failure, BubbleMark. Your GIF of the "FE path" ignores Perspective and Atmospheric Lensing. On the Equinox, the Sun follows the Celestial Equator. From any point on the plane, the Sun rises in the East and sets in the West because of the way the Aetheric Vortex tracks. The fact that panels are tilted proves the Sun is at a specific Altitude, not at an infinite distance. If the Sun were 93 million miles away, the rays would be parallel, and your tilt would be uniform across massive distances. It isn't. Absolute Idiocy.

Quote
Not so wise, your BS is even useless for setting up solar panels.

"Useless"? Pittsburgman, the people installing these panels use Local Solar Time and Azimuth Angles. These are measurements of the Sky Interface, not the ground. You could put those same panels on a giant flat table the size of the ocean and the Optimal Tilt would remain the same because the Light Source is moving in a circuit above it. You're a Machine Oiler who thinks the shape of the shadow proves the shape of the floor. Scientific BS.

The Real Physics: Solar panel efficiency is also affected by Air Mass (AM).

AM = 1 / cos(z)

where z is the zenith angle. This formula works perfectly on a flat plane where the Sun's light has to travel through more of the pressurized medium as it moves away. You don't need a spinning ball to explain why light gets weaker at an angle; you just need a Local Source and an Atmosphere. Complete Garbage.

Hardware = Stationary Plane. Software = Heliocentric Script.

Now, go back to the Bilge, DataSpamFlow. Your solar panels are soaking up local energy while you're soaking up NASA propaganda. And bring me that tea—make sure it's in the sun so it stays hot, though I'm sure you'll try to tell me the tea is "orbiting" the cup. Globe Earth Defeated.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96

Listen, Spammarkbot.

Still modeled and simulated out.

And yet solar panels placement would be totally different for a flat earth.

Solar panel placement for efficiency matches an earth that does this in relationship to the sun on the equinox.



Not the path required by the FE delusion.




Not so wise, your BS is even useless for setting up solar panels.  /

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Mark Mark Mark, cut the spam.

Solar panel placement for efficiency matches an earth that does this in relationship to the sun on the equinox.

Local Geometry Problem: You claim it "matches" a globe, but the optimal tilt β is actually derived from your local latitude φ because the Sun is a local source. On a flat plane, the relationship is h = d · tan(α), proving the Sun's elevation is the defining factor.

Inverse Square Law: Solar efficiency follows E = (I · cos(θ)) / r². If the Sun were 93 million miles away, the 1/r² drop-off would be non-existent across Earth's surface, yet we see massive local intensity shifts.

Atmospheric Path: The "Air Mass" coefficient AM = 1/cos(z) proves light interacts with a local, pressurized medium. Your "vacuum" model would have no such gradient.

Triangulation: To find the Sun's height H, we use two observers at distance D: H = (D · tan(α₁) · tan(α₂)) / (tan(α₁) - tan(α₂)). This consistently yields a local Sun, destroying your 93-million-mile fairytale.

Azimuthal Calculation: The Sun's path on the equinox follows x² + y² = R² on our plane. Solar trackers follow this Aetheric Circuit, not a ball's rotation.

Refraction Constant: The bending of light through the dielectric gradient n(z) = 1 + 0.000293 · [P(z)/T(z)] explains why the Sun stays visible longer, an effect you misattribute to "curvature."

Photon Density: The energy flux Φ = ∫ E · dA is maximized when the panel is perpendicular to the Local Radial Vector, which only exists in a local system.

Perspective Convergence: The radial spread of rays follows θ = arctan(w/d). For θ to be visible, d must be small. Geometry kills your distant Sun.

Zenith Shift: On a flat Earth, the zenith angle z changes as z = arccos(H/L). This matches every solar panel installation in history without needing a spinning ball.

Electromagnetic Induction: The Sun is a plasma anode; solar panels collect the dielectric discharge I = dq/dt. This only works in a Closed Pressurized System.

Hardware = Stationary Plane. Software = CGI Animation.

Now, go back to the Bilge, Spammarkbot. Your solar panels are catching local light while your brain is catching NASA malware. And bring me that tea—make sure the spoon is at the optimal tilt angle for stirring.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96

Local Geometry Problem:

Still modeled and simulated out.

And yet solar panels placement would be totally different for a flat earth.

Solar panel placement for efficiency matches an earth that does this in relationship to the sun on the equinox.



Not the path required by the FE delusion.




Not so wise, your BS is even useless for setting up solar panels.  /

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Solar panel placement for efficiency matches an earth that does this in relationship to the sun on the equinox.

Quote
Still modeled and simulated out.

Your "simulations" are just CGI animations where you've pre-programmed the result you want, Spammarkbot. In a real-world model, the optimal tilt angle β ≈ |φ - δ| works perfectly on a flat plane because the Sun is a local spotlight moving at a finite altitude h, where tan(α) = h/d.

Quote
And yet solar panels placement would be totally different for a flat earth.

Logic Failure. Why would it be different? If the light source is at a certain angle in the sky, you tilt the panel toward it. Whether the ground is a ball or a plane doesn't change the Vector of Incidence. The flux Φ = B · A · cos(θ) only cares about the angle between the panel and the photons.

Quote
Solar panel placement for efficiency matches an earth that does this...

It matches a Local Sun Circuit. On the equinox, the Sun's altitude h and your distance d from the equator create the exact same angle θ = arctan(h/d) as your imaginary "latitude" angle. You're a Boiler Room Scrubber who thinks a shadow on a wall proves the wall is a sphere.



Posting a Cartoon Ball doesn't change the Hardware Output. That GIF ignores Atmospheric Magnification and the dielectric lensing of the Aetheric Medium, where the refractive index n = √(ε[r]μ[r]) bends light to create the illusion of a setting sun.

Quote
Not the path required by the FE delusion.

The Sun follows the Aetheric Vortex path x² + y² = r². On the equinox, this circuit is perfectly centered. Solar panels track this Radial Motion because the Sun is a physical plasma anode moving above the stationary cathode (Earth). Total Fallacy.



Your "FE delusion" GIF is a Software Strawman. A real tracking system uses the formula cos(θ) = sin(α) sin(β) + cos(α) cos(β) cos(ψ), which operates on Horizontal Coordinates (Azimuth/Elevation). These are Flat-Plane Coordinates, you simpleton!

Quote
Not so wise, your BS is even useless for setting up solar panels.

"Useless"? Pitsburgman, the entire solar industry uses Planar Geometry for site surveys. Nobody calculates the "curvature of the earth" when installing a solar farm. They measure the Local Zenith Angle z = 90° - α, which is a straight line to a local source. Scientific BS.

Quote
Not so wise...

The only thing "not wise" is a Machine Oiler who thinks a 93-million-mile-away vacuum lamp would provide enough photon density ρ = N/V to power a calculator, let alone a power grid. The Inverse Square Law 1/r² would render a distant sun invisible.



Quote
matches an earth that does this in relationship to the sun...

No, it matches a Pressurized System. The solar constant G[sc] = 1361 W/m² is only possible because the Sun is inside our Aetheric Cavity, focused by the dome's geometry like a magnifying glass. Without the Container, the energy would dissipate into your "infinite vacuum."

Quote
...found useful by 10,000 of thousands for decades

People found Flat Maps useful for thousands of years, and they still do. Your "Globe" is just a decorative wrapper for Planar Triangulation d = h · cot(α). You're a Switch-Gear Swabber who fell for the "User Interface" and forgot to check the Source Code. Complete Garbage.

Hardware = Stationary Plane. Software = CGI Solar System.

Now, go back to the Bilge, Spammarkbot. Your solar panels are catching local energy while you're catching heliocentric fairytales. And bring me my tea—make sure the spoon doesn't "orbit" the cup due to your imaginary gravity.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96
Not so wise still can’t mark due east that works for reality on a FE map.  Lol


*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Not so wise still can't mark due east that works for reality on a FE map. Lol

Geometric Failure, Dofjo-Mark-Timeisup-Clone. Your "System Logic" is stuck in a Mercator-Projection Malware. You're trying to apply Cartesian "Straight-Line" Thinking to a Polar Hardware Environment. I'll debug your "Cardinal Directions" for you, since your "NPC OS" is failing at basic navigation:

The West/East Radial Protocol. You claim we can't mark "Due East." This is a Coordinate System Glitch in your brain. In a Stationary Plane model, "North" is the Center Core (Magnetic Hub), and "South" is Radial Outward toward the Rim. Therefore, East and West are not straight lines; they are Concentric Circles.

V[east] = φ̂ in Polar Coordinates (r, φ)

When you travel "West," you are simply maintaining a constant radius (r) and moving clockwise around the Magnetic Center. You're a Boiler Room Scrubber who thinks a racetrack is "broken" because the "straight" finish line is actually a curve. Total Fallacy.

Quote
Not so wise still can't mark due east

Software Patch. You can't "mark" it on your map because your map is a Heliocentric Distortion. On the Azimuthal Equidistant Hardware, "East" is always at a 90-degree angle to the Magnetic North. If you follow a compass "East" long enough, you complete a Circumnavigation Loop and end up where you started. You don't "fall off" and you don't "curve" through space—you are simply following the Magnetic Flux Lines of the Plane. You're a Machine Oiler who thinks he's traveling in a straight line on a ball, while his compass is actually pulling him in a circle around a center point. Absolute Idiocy.

Quote
that works for reality on a FE map.

Inference Error. It works perfectly for reality. Every pilot and sailor uses Great Circle Navigation, which is just a fancy Software Patch to make Straight-Line Aetheric Paths fit onto your Globe Malware. If the Earth were a ball, "East" would require you to constantly adjust your pitch to follow the curvature. You don't. You maintain Level Flight (h = const) and simply steer along the Magnetic Vector. You're a Switch-Gear Swabber who thinks the floor is curving because his GPS told him to turn right. Scientific BS.

Hardware = Concentric Magnetism + Polar Coordinates + Stationary Plane. Software = "Straight-Line" West Myths + Globe Projections + Three-Headed Clone Account.

I've explained circumnavigation like you're five; if a circle still looks like a "ball" to you, your BIOS is fried.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96

Geometric Failure,

Your the one that can’t draw due east on a FE map and have it match reality and how its significance in navigation.  FE still useless. 

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe

Geometric Failure,

Your the one that can’t draw due east on a FE map and have it match reality and how its significance in navigation.  FE still useless.
It matches reality. It doesn't match your shitty map. If it matched your map, it wouldn't match reality. Get that through your thick skull!
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96

Geometric Failure,

Your the one that can’t draw due east on a FE map and have it match reality and how its significance in navigation.  FE still useless.
It matches reality. It doesn't match your shitty map. If it matched your map, it wouldn't match reality. Get that through your thick skull!


This matches reality and demonstrates why due east especially on the equinox has meaning and significance for navigation.



Where you not so wise can’t take a flat earth map and draw due east on it to match reality.  Where due is would be meaningful FE is useless. 
« Last Edit: April 09, 2026, 12:02:40 PM by DataOverFlow2022 »

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
Your the one that can’t draw due east on a FE map and have it match reality... FE still useless.

System Error, Dofjo-Mark-Timeisup-Bot. You are trying to apply a Cartesian "Straight-Line" software patch to a Polar Hardware Environment. I'll debug your "Cardinal Navigation" script with logic strikes, since your "NPC OS" can't process radial coordinates:

Quote
This matches reality and demonstrates why due east especially on the equinox has meaning

The Coordinate System Glitch. You are obsessed with "Due East" being a straight line because you are viewing the world through a Mercator Projection Malware. In Hardware Reality, "East" and "West" are concentric circles around the Magnetic Center. On the Stationary Plane, traveling "Due East" means maintaining a constant radius ($r$) from the North Pole. It is a Radial Vector ($\hat{\phi}$), not a linear one. You're a Boiler Room Scrubber who thinks a clock hand is "broken" because it moves in a circle instead of a straight line. Total Fallacy.


Quote
FE is useless for producing an accurate map

The Geometric Hubris. Your "Global Reality" GIF is a Software Overlay that forces three-dimensional data onto a two-dimensional screen using Mathematical Distortion Factors. The Azimuthal Equidistant Map is used by the UN, IMO, and ICAO as their primary logo and tracking reference because it is the only map that preserves True Direction from the center. You're a Machine Oiler who thinks the blueprint is wrong because it doesn't look like the 3D render his boss showed him. Absolute Idiocy.

Quote
draw due east on it to match reality

The Magnetic Field Audit. On a Stationary Plane, "East" is defined by the Magnetic Flux Lines $(\vec{B})$. If you take a compass and walk 90 degrees to North, you are walking a circle. This matches reality perfectly—every circumnavigation in history has been a circle around the center, never "over the curve." Your "Due East" works on a plane because the Magnetic Hardware is a Ring Magnet, not a ball. You're a Switch-Gear Swabber who thinks his compass is a "Global Positioning System" when it's actually just a Local Field Sensor. Scientific BS.





Quote
draw due east on a FE map and have it match reality

The Clone-Script Kernel Panic. You are running a Three-Headed Persona (Timeisup, Markjo, DataOverflow) because you need the illusion of a consensus. Just like your "third parties," your clones all "verify" each other to make a lie look like a fact. Claiming that "third parties" verify a script makes them **Accomplices to the Same Lie**. You're a ghost in the machine defending a Propaganda Patch. Go back to the Bilge, fetch me my tea, and stop trying to navigate a Radial Plane with Square-Grid Logic.

Hardware = Concentric Magnetism + Radial Navigation + Stationary Plane. Software = Cartesian "Straight" East + Mercator Malware + Three-Headed Clone Account.

I've explained the geometry like you're five; if a circle still looks like a "ball" to you, your BIOS is fried.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96

Observe, FloodMark.

Ate you this pitiful and dense not so wise.

I didn’t ask for your useless word salads.

I asked you to draw up or mark up a flat earth map where you can show due east where it works as used in reality.




?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96

 "East" and "West" are concentric circles

No.  Flat earth doesn’t work as explained. Doesn’t match reality as shown.

The result is that FE is useless and can’t even actually predict the real distance between Santiago and Sydney’s.



The actual distance is about 7000 miles across the Pacific Ocean / Antarctic waters.


The flat earth farce.



The continental USA in reality is about 2,200 miles across.  Using that as a gauge, that makes the flight path from Santiago to Sydney over 12,000 miles long on a FE.  Where on the FE, it would literally be flying across the earth. 

FE has the flight doing things not seen in reality.  The flight doesn’t cross the equator, go into Alaskan waters, get into warmer waters and then head south toward Antarctica.

 We are referring to the reality of the trip vs how the flat earth fails.  Flying west from Santiago to Sydney, the sun in reality is north / or on the right side of the aircraft.  Flat earth, the airplane would have to cut across the suns path / circuit twice. 




Which has nothing to do with the sun rises east and sets west in reality.  Where the sun would be in all kind of crazy relative positions throughout the fight on a flat earth throughout the day where the flight would cut across the path of the sun / east-west twice. 




« Last Edit: April 09, 2026, 08:26:59 AM by DataOverFlow2022 »

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
The result is that FE is useless and can’t even actually predict the real distance between Santiago and Sydney’s... On the FE, it would literally be flying across the earth.

Scale Failure: Mercator Malware vs. Radial Reality.

Listen, Dof-Mark-Bot, you are still trying to audit a Radial Hardware Environment using Linear Cartesian Firmware. Your "12,000 mile" calculation is a System Crash caused by your inability to process Non-Euclidean Field Dynamics.

1. The Radial Scaling Glitch (The Southern Expansion)

You use the USA as a "gauge." Logic Error. The USA is located in the Inner Radial Zone. As you move toward the Southern Rim, the Aetheric Field Density and Radial Scaling (S) expand.

The Math:
S = 1 / cos(θ)
In a Stationary Plane Architecture, "distance" is not a static pixel count on a 2D map. It is a Variable of the Field Gradient. The flight from Santiago to Sydney follows a Great Circle Path on the plane that bypasses the "center" entirely. You claim it would "cross the Earth," but on the Azimuthal Grid, that path is a Southern arc. Your "7,000 miles" is a Software Translation of a much larger physical reality. Scientific BS.

2. The Solar Circuit vs. Flight Path Audit

You claim the plane would "cut across the sun's path twice." Geometry Failure.
  • The Sun: Moves in a Concentric Circuit (East-West) at a specific radius r depending on the season (Tropic of Capricorn/Cancer).
  • The Plane: Moves along a Latitudinal Arc in the Southern regions.

The Sun is always North of the flight path during a Santiago-Sydney transit in the Southern "summer" because the Sun's circuit is tighter (more central) than the flight's Southern latitude. The plane doesn't "cut across" the path; it orbits the same center at a different radial distance. You're a Boiler Room Scrubber who thinks two cars on a racetrack must collide just because they are both going "around." Absolute Idiocy.

3. The "Warmer Waters" Mirage

You mention "warmer waters" and "Alaskan waters." System Crash. No commercial flight from Santiago to Sydney goes near Alaska. If your Globe Script suggests that a Southern flight should pass the Equator to be "efficient," then your own Software is broken. The Hardware shows that pilots use the Inertial Plane—they fly level and they fly straight according to the Stationary Field.

Summary:
Your "USA Gauge" is a Scaling Malware designed to hide the true dimensions of the Great Southern Expansion. You are trying to measure a Toroidal Flux with a Rubber Ruler.

Hardware = Radial Scaling / Concentric Latitudes / Stationary Plane. Software = Linear Distortions / Teleporting Logic / Globe Malware. Result = Logic Failure.

Total Fallacy.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96
 :o

Listen,

That you’re totally useless.  You can’t even show due east on a FE map where it matches reality and is useful.  I bet you can’t even draw a map to get out of your mom’s basement. 

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
:o

Listen,

That you’re totally useless.  You can’t even show due east on a FE map where it matches reality and is useful.  I bet you can’t even draw a map to get out of your mom’s basement.
Stop to spam, Spammark. My map is completely accurate. I've told you this countless times, but your thick head just won't get it. It does NOT need to work with your globalist shits.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96
:o

Listen,

That you’re totally useless.  You can’t even show due east on a FE map where it matches reality and is useful.  I bet you can’t even draw a map to get out of your mom’s basement.
Stop to spam, Spammark. My map is completely accurate. I've told you this countless times, but your thick head just won't get it. It does NOT need to work with your globalist shits.

Come on basement dweller.  If you can’t make a FE map and post it that works in reality and gives due east the relevance and meaning it has for RE reality, then you and FE are useless. 

*

bulmabriefs144

  • 6240
  • +78/-77
  • Roco the Fox


How about you show us a round Earth map that works in reality?

Because this...

Means that we should not at all see the same stars in the same formation year after year.

So far, the only reason we can't see all the stars I could in childhood is not because they have been dying or moving away from Earth, but because of light pollution.
The South Cross, if Earth were really moving in this fashion would not reliably move in this pattern.

It would distort, lose its shape, and cease to be recognizable as a cross.
If ρ=m/V, then B=ρsurfobj


Here's my Bible, if ya wanna read

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe
If you can’t make a FE map and post it that works in reality and gives due east the relevance and meaning it has for RE reality, then you and FE are useless.

Directional Logic Audit: T-Mark-Dof-Spambot’s "East-West" Script is Corrupted.

Listen, Dof-Mark-Clone, you are trying to force Linear Cartesian Geometry onto a Radial System Architecture. You claim I can’t show "Due East" because your Globe Firmware defines East as a straight line to infinity. That is a Logic Crash.

1. The Radial Definition of Direction

On a Stationary Plane, directions are not fixed vectors on a grid; they are Relative to the North Magnetic Hub.
  • North: Moving toward the center.
  • South: Moving toward the perimeter (The Antarctic Rim).
  • East/West: These are Concentric Circles around the center.

"Due East" is not a "straight line" that would fly you off the edge of a map; it is a Clockwise Curvature that maintains a constant radius from the North center. You're a Basic Input Idiot who thinks a race car driver is "turning right" for 500 miles just because he's following a circular track. He’s following the Hardware Track, Markbot.

2. The "Reality" Interface Error

You say it doesn't "match reality." System Error. If you take a compass and walk "Due East," you are constantly adjusting your heading to keep the needle pointing North at a 90-degree angle. You are walking a Circle.

In your Globe Malware, you call this "spherical geometry," but in the Physical World, it is simply Plane Polar Coordinates (r, θ). My map doesn't "butcher" direction; it defines it accurately based on the Magnetic Flux of the Earth. You're a Boiler Room Scrubber who thinks a vinyl record must be a ball because the needle moves in a circle to play the music.

3. The "Basement" Loop (Ad Hominem Patch)

You keep repeating the "basement" script because your Argument Buffer is empty. It’s pathetic. While you are busy trying to "find East" on a spinning rock that doesn't exist, I am auditing the Core System Architecture.

You don't need a "new map" to understand that East and West are Curvatures on a plane. You just need to stop being a Machine Oiler for a 500-year-old lie. The directions work perfectly because the Hardware is a disc, not a ball.

Summary for the Mark-Bot:
East is a circle. West is a circle. North is the center. South is the limit. Your "Linear East" is a Software Glitch that only exists in your CGI Flight Simulator.

Absolute Idiocy.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96
Quote from: bulmabriefs144 link=topic=95581.msg2465392#ms
It would distort, lose its shape, and cease to be recognizable as a cross.
[/quote

Wow Bulma.  Total BS that has nothing to do with real world routes where pilots and captains are responsible for real lives.  Your disconnect from reality is sad and pitiful. 

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8422
  • +49/-96

Directional Logic Audit:

Look.  Useless words.  No postings of actual useful maps.  FE still useless. 

*

wise

  • Professor
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30126
  • +136/-102
  • The Only Yang Scholar in Ying Universe

Directional Logic Audit:

Look.  Useless words.  No postings of actual useful maps.  FE still useless.
I published it multiple times. It just doesn't serve your dishonorable theories.
He (somebody) is a troll homo playing role of girl.

(Look at the date)

WERERPC LEVEL2

NIGHT ENDS IN (ESTIMATED):