The one central star positioned directly above the center of our flat Earth, which has never once moved in its one position, you believe is proof for an Earth ball speeding and spinning through endless space?
Are you capable of reading what people say at all?
No, they are NOT saying it is proof that Earth is moving at all.
Instead, they are correctly pointing out it is proof beyond any sane doubt that Earth is round.
And it is so irrefutable you need to deflect from it straight away.
And your statement is also pure BS.
Polaris traces out a small circle every day. It is not magically fixed.
And over thousands of years, different stars take the place of the pole star.
Yet again, you are just asserting pathetic BS.
But that motion of Polaris is entirely irrelevant to the argument at hand.
What is important is that it appears in a different location in the sky for different observers, while constellations are not distorted nor appear with different angular sizes.
The ONLY sane explanation for that is that the reference, i.e. the surface of Earth, is at a different orientation.
If you think there is an alternative, then provide it.
Again, key points to note is that consteallations, other than appearing rotated, appear the same to all observers.
The angular size does not change, nor do they appear stretched or squashed in any direction, nor do the stars appear to have moved relative to each other.
This means they must be being seen from roughly the same angle and roughly the same distance.
Seeing that every one of our stars above Earth, are the very same stars in the very same positions above Earth, since we have seen them to this very day
No, they aren't.
Lying wont save you.
It just shows how pathetic and desperate you are.
are nothing but more lies they’ve told us, all along the way.
Based on what? That it doesn't match your pathetic fantasy?
You yet again assert they are lies, with absolutely no evidence at all.
The very same constellations of multiple stars are all the same
Regardless of where on Earth you are, showing they are incredibly far away and are being viewed from roughly the same direction.
So the only sane explanation for the apparent difference in position relative to Earth's surface, is the portion of Earth's surface you are standing on is at a different orientation.
i.e. Earth is round.
Do you have a better explanation?
You’re wrongly assuming
No. We CONCLUDE, based upon the evidence and argument you need to flee from.
What an incredible coincidence to have a North Pole of a ball Earth at the exact center point of the flat Earth
It isn't an amazing coincidence.
The lying FE scum simply took the north pole centred azimuthal equidistant projection and presented that as their FE.
But because of all the problems that causes in the south, not all FE cultists accept that.
Some have a south pole centred fantasy. Others have a bipolar fantasy.
another amazing coincidence that one star is directly above the center point of the flat Earth
Except it isn't.
It is NOT directly above the north pole.
And again, over thousands of years, that star changes.
one star which never moves at all from its position
Repeatedly lying will not save you.
Given how many stars there are, it is incredibly likely that one star will fall close enough for people to say it is good enough.
Let’s figure out how we’d actually see those stars move
How about before that, you try dealing with the argument at hand, and explain how we can see the same constellations all over Earth, with no distortion, yet having them appear in a completely different part of the sky?
Stop with your pathetic BS of deflecting from the topic at all costs.
And if you do want to try figuring out how something would actually work for the RE model, make sure you are actually using the RE model, not your pathetic strawmen.
And don't just make it pathetic, vague BS.
we’d all see stars moving above us differently on different points on Earth.
You mean how we can look up towards the north celestial pole, and see them appear to circle the pole in one direction; and we can look towards stars near the south celestial pole and see them appear to circle in the opposite direction, and see stars near the celestial equator, which instead appear to circle about an axis roughly parallel to the axis of Earth?
i.e. exactly what we see in reality?
All you are doing is further proving your BS wrong.
Now care to stop with all the pathetic BS and explain why we see the constellations appear the same yet in drastically different parts of the sky?