So basically, in five years, you've been unable to make proof so airtight that it cannot be denied.
Any evidence, no matter how compelling or ironclad, can simply be denied/rejected, by dishonest POS like you and your cult leader.
Look at how much YOU have denied, including just outright ignoring because it doesn't fit your delusional fantasy.
Look at how many things have been clearly explained to you, with you just entirely ignoring it and spouting the same refuted BS again and again.
People can deny the existence of Earth if they want to.
And no, this is not about you offering perfect evidence, and him refusing to believe in it.
No, it very much is about plenty of evidence already existing which clearly demonstrates Earth is round, with dishonest POS like you and your cult leader rejecting it because it doesn't fit your fantasy.
Do you know the easy way to see that the offer is BS?
He spends so much time on discussing what will be rejected, while failing to provide a single example of what would be considered acceptable.
And I don't mean an actual example showing Earth is round, just a hypothetical. Because that would be how the scientific method actually works.
e.g. Consider what was discussed in a different thread, where objects disappear due to curvature, using the null hypothesis.
If it was based upon limited resolution (i.e. the null hypothesis where Earth is flat), then you should be able to zoom in/use better optics to see further.
Under the "alternate" hypothesis, i.e. that Earth is round, curvature is blocking the view, so better optics will let you resolve things better but wont let you see further once you reach the point where the curvature is blocking the view.
So if we get a telephoto lens and zoom in, we will see one of 2 things:
1 - Under the null hypothesis, we can keep seeing further and further. If the bottom appears to be obscured we can zoom in more and see more of it appear.
2 - Under the alternate hypothesis, we can zoom in until we can see a distant object partly obscured by the horizon. Then if we zoom in more, we can see the object better, but no more appears.
Of course, if he provided such an example, the question would then be why hasn't he checked, and we know why, because it will show he is wrong.
Meanwhile, I have done this, and haven't seen any more of the object appear.
I can provide plenty of examples, unfortunately, the results all show Earth isn't flat.
Much of your evidence (that I have seen personally) involves one of three fallacies
No, you just want to pretend it does.
Plenty doesn't. Including plenty you have been presented with here, which you just ignore.
Instead, you just appealing to these strawmen to pretend people are making those arguments.
Yet no bounty was offered for Behind the Curve.
And no honest, sane person would ever expect the bounty to ever be offered to anyone.
Why?
Because Dubay is a lying POS with no interest in the truth and no interest in paying out a bounty that showed he was wrong.
Did he not watch it?
Probably not. I certainly didn't.
i.e. You both choose to remain wilfully ignorant of reality.
It isn't that evidence doesn't exist, instead it is that you don't like what it shows so you ignore it so you can cling to your delusional fantasy.
intentionally making the subject of "flat Earth" seem as ridiculous as possible.
No, just demonstrating how ridiculous FEers are.
You are another great example of just how ridiculous FEers are, as is Dubay.
Should we dismiss you both as controlled opposition disinformation agents?
Yup, he watched it. Pretty sure no money was awarded.
And again, with how much of a lying POS Dubay is, no sane person would expect it to be payed.
Dubay could be taken out into space, clearly shown the rotating round Earth beneath him, and he would still refuse.
As for his video, the first speaker was too Scottish. I can safely say I've seen neither video. And neither should you.
i.e. you want us to remain as wilfully ignorant as you.
No thanks.
You showed a doddering fogey who is supposedly a flat Earther, but looks more of a senile fart than my now dead great uncle. Why even was he testing with circular pipes?
i.e. you didn't even bother attempting to understand it.
Instead, like the lying coward you are, you just looked for an excuse to dismiss it.
This is why the bounty is pointless. Because you lying cowards will just dismiss and refuse to understand.
Meanwhile, Stonehenge and the Pyramids of Egypt were kinda sorta built to keep solar time.
So is a sundial.
That doesn't prove anything.
No, they kept accurate time, century after century
They kept accurate solar time.
So what?
That is like saying if I have this inaccurate watch, and base all ideas of time on it, then this watch keeps time accurately.
It is entirely circular.
When you have a device which can consistently measure time, it shows these solar clocks are wrong.
Almost like... the Earth isn't a spinning ball traveling through the galaxy but a fixed plane, and the sun, the moon, and the stars all show this.
No, nothing like that.
As the stars, the sun, the other planets and moon instead indicate Earth is a rotating planet moving through space.
But yes, I'm sure someone here will see shadows from a ring sitting on the ground, and decide there must be something wrong.
They will if they have a brain and choose to use it.
You CHOOSING not to use it just shows you don't care about reality.
I don't owe you anything, because you fall under the third definition.
Quite the opposite. YOU DO!
You don't even make an attempt to understand. You just dismiss.
Try to actually understand the experiment, and then explain what is wrong with it.
The fact you can't do this, shows the problem is with you.
As to the line being straight, yeah? That what light does, it travels in a straight line.
Light travelling in a straight line doesn't mean that shows will.
And no, you didn't see light go upward on a stick.
You do at sunrise and sunset.
Your wilful rejection of reality wont change that.