No, you haven’t a clue about it.
I clearly do. Because you keep just repeating the same pathetic BS without even attempting to address what I said.
Look at how much you continually flee from simple questions that show you are spouting delusional BS.
Wind is spread over an area, as a single force of strength.
That means each object hit by that span of wind, which is of one strength along its span, will be hit by various amounts of the one force of wind. The wind doesn’t add or reduce its strength of one level of force, the objects will be hit by a larger SPAN of the one wind force, or less of that span of force.
Wind is a force over an area, so it is an objects surface area which is the variable to how much of the one wind force that hits it.
Again, you can do the same with gravity:
"Gravity is spread over a mass, as a single force of strength.
That means each object hit by that span of gravity, which is of one strength along its span, will be hit by various amounts of the one force of gravity. The gravity doesn’t add or reduce its strength of one level of force, the objects will be hit by a larger SPAN of the one gravity force, or less of that span of force.
Gravity is a force over a mass, so it is an objects mass which is the variable to how much of the one gravity force that hits it."
This force would make all objects of different masses, after emitting out one level of force or strength from the ball Earth core, somehow, for no possible reason, after emitting out one level of force, detect or sense or indicate in some unknown way, each objects mass
No more so than wind detects the area.
Again, gravity acts on each bit of mass.
You would expect the same force in a 2 kg mass as you would in the combined sum of two separate 1 kg masses
Nobody also knows why it chose this specific rate to pull all things down at either,
It didn't choose a specific rate no more so than magnets chose a specific force.
It is a constant of proportionality just like other real fundamental forces. It then depends upon this constant, as well as the mass and distance to the primary (and its distribution of mass).
And as pointed out, it isn't a constant rate. It varies over Earth.
These things aren’t important to explain with a force that’s been made up, anyway.
Which is why you refuse to make any attempt to do so and instead just keep repeating the same pathetic BS.
The worst part is that your made up force must have an explanation for why it would pull different masses down at the same rate
Again, not a made up force.
A real force you can verify exists yourself, which you choose not to because you want to live in a fantasy.
And this real force can explain it, with that explanation provided to you repeatedly.
Once more, take two identical separate 1 kg objects. Each of these will accelerate downwards at the same rate, based upon the force of gravity acting on each.
Now join them together. The same force is acting on each part of the object.
Why should it magically change because they are now 1 object?
That means the ratio of force to mass remains the same so the acceleration remains the same.
Not hard to understand.
It’s nonsensical. Forces don’t know or detect things of objects it hits, let alone adjust its strength to the objects, and balance them out equally to respond the same way to that force.
Nor does gravity.
So yes, your BS is truly insane nonsense.
Now again, care to address the simple issues you keep fleeing from?
If you want to claim magic density, explain what causes the pressure gradient and why this doesn't push things up.
Until you do, your claims remain refuted delusional BS.
Then you can address the other issues you have consistently fled from:
1 - Why down?
2 - Why that rate?
3 - Why doesn't the rate depend directly on density or even the difference in density?
4 - Why does the rate vary across Earth?
Simple questions you can't answer that show you are spouting pure BS.