Alternative FET

  • 3 Replies
  • 3631 Views
Alternative FET
« on: May 19, 2024, 03:16:06 PM »
THE TRUE ORBIT OF THE SUN:
The Sun does not orbit parallel to the Earth's plane, it rises in the east, follows a straight path over the equator at the equinoxes and in arcs over the tropics at the solstices, always making its natural variations.  The Sun sets in the west and passes beneath the earth, where rotating etheric currents flow quickly causing the Sun to rise on the other side in a matter of seconds, the luminiferous ether is denser in the vicinity of the first firmament (the Sun is outside), thus the Sun's light and mirage are maintained for some time in the west while the Sun is simultaneously rising again in the east.

The density of the luminiferous ether is also the reason why the Sun does not significantly change its apparent size, causing a magnifying effect like a magnifying glass.

Electromagnetic acceleration is what makes the Sun appear to rise and set before it does so solidly.

 https://wiki.tfes.org/Electromagnetic_Acceleration

The Sun's illumination is not like a spotlight and its light does not reach the surface of the poles, the midnight Sun at both poles is caused by the reflection of the Sun on the moon Eos, there is one for each pole, Eos is also responsible for the auroras.
 https://brasilescola.uol.com.br/mitologia/eos.htm

Earthquakes are more common in the Pacific oceans (there are two) and nearby because the magnetism, heat and radiation from the Sun have affected the formation of Pacific tectonic plates, as they are very close to where the Sun passes.
 https://www.nationalgeographicbrasil.com/meio-ambiente/2023/02/quais-sao-as-3-regioes-com-mais-terremotos-do-mundo
« Last Edit: May 19, 2024, 03:18:01 PM by AnneFrothingslosh »

*

sandokhan

  • Flat Earth Sultan
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 7267
  • +0/-1
Re: Alternative FET
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2024, 10:53:27 AM »
You are using my AFET, almost word by word. That is, without the tfeswiki reference to "electromagnec acceleration". It doesn't work like that. The gravitational and antigravitational waves will form a torus or a sphere around the object, thus that object will no longer have weight. If you want to PROVE that the Sun has antigravitational waves in its atmosphere, you will have to show the existence of Koronium, just like I have done.

*

sandokhan

  • Flat Earth Sultan
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 7267
  • +0/-1
Re: Alternative FET
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2024, 09:41:15 PM »
And you think that I have not addressed those issues in countless debates?

Please explain to your readers HOW the altitude is measured in those balloons. Are you going to even mention GPS? Or what else? The altitude is completely wrong: those balloons never make it past 7 or 8 kilometers above the surface of the Earth.

You are forgetting about the density of the ether which acts as a barrier or shield above the atmosphere (the heavenly dome).

*

sandokhan

  • Flat Earth Sultan
  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 7267
  • +0/-1
Re: Alternative FET
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2024, 05:25:17 AM »
Quote
The Sun sets in the west and passes beneath the earth, where rotating etheric currents flow quickly causing the Sun to rise on the other side in a matter of seconds, the luminiferous ether is denser in the vicinity of the first firmament (the Sun is outside), thus the Sun's light and mirage are maintained for some time in the west while the Sun is simultaneously rising again in the east.

The density of the luminiferous ether is also the reason why the Sun does not significantly change its apparent size, causing a magnifying effect like a magnifying glass.

Then, if you are stating that the ether does exist, I win.

Take a look at this:



The calculation was carried out by Wolfgang Pauli, one of the greatest physicists of the 20th century.

"If the electromagnetic field would really have a non vanishing zero-point energy, 'the universe would not even reach to the moon'".

If the ether drift field (zero point energy, scalar waves) does exist, then the radius of curvature of the observable universe is 31 km.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/9/1/011/pdf

C. P. Enz, A. Thellung : Nullpunktenergie und Anordnung
nicht vertauschbarer Faktoren im Hamiltonoperator ,
Helv. Phys. Acta 33, 839–848 (1960) pg 842

https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article/53/1/1.24/218451

https://arxiv.org/pdf/0810.2213.pdf


Now you understand where you went wrong? You said that balloons ascend higher than 30 km. It can't be if you believe the ether does exist. From those 31 km that Pauli was talking about, you need to defer some 20 km for the stars and planets, and you are left with some 11 km to the dome.