PHEW IS OFFICIALLY VERIFIED

C/D = 3.17157 is already validated by directorate general of copyright.

Phew is not blurry stuff anymore. It's been verified by experts. 👌

Guys.. thank you so much for being part of the journey, either pro or con. All are highly appreciated 🙏

What

C/D AKA PHEW = 3.17157 already has an official certificate.
Pi = 3.14159 is all about polygon, not circle.

Riiiight...

VERIFIED!

C/D = 3.17157 is already validated by directorate general of copyright.

Phew is not blurry stuff anymore. It's been verified by experts. 👌

An expert in copyright.
What you are really saying with that is that that is your imaginative output.
You can't copyright a fact.

So it has been verified as being fictitious by experts.

Could someone enlighten me? What is a pheyew? Other than the smell.

Could someone enlighten me? What is a pheyew? Other than the smell.

A BS version of pi, i.e. a the ratio from a circles diameter to its circumference.
They think it should be bigger, but they can't justify why.

So it is basically "pheyew "

C/D = 3.17157 is already validated by directorate general of copyright.

Phew is not blurry stuff anymore. It's been verified by experts. 👌

Precicely:
Directorate General of Intelectual Property

Precicely:
Directorate General of Intelectual Property

Again, it being intellectual property means it is fictional. It is made up. An invention of your mind.
You would not be able to get copyright for the actual ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.

for 1 D and 2 D it's Phew = 3.17157
for 3 D it's Pi = 3.14159

Deal?

 

For circle area, it's Pi = 3.14159 

for 1 D and 2 D it's Phew = 3.17157
for 3 D it's Pi = 3.14159

Deal?

No deal.
3D directly relies upon 2D. 2D directly relies upon 1D.
They are all pi. None are Phew.

If you are trying to say some are pi and others are not, you are simply wrong.

Tips:
A. Calculate a small angle, you'll find poligon's cords miserably.
B. Calculate a VERY small angle, you'll find the arc is superior than sine/tangent lines.

Translate those calculation results into several meters.

Thank you so much Pezevenk & SCG fir your supports. 👌

In real technic companies, pi is not applied. They pick, among others, 3.15.

Nice try...

Tips:
A. Calculate a small angle, you'll find poligon's cords miserably.
B. Calculate a VERY small angle, you'll find the arc is superior than sine/tangent lines.

Translate those calculation results into several meters.

No, you wont.

Calculate an angle less than 90 degrees. This could be quite large, almost 90, or really really tiny, like 0.00000000000000001 degrees.
You will find that you are able to calculate the points for a polygon.
You will find that the sine is always smaller than the arc length and the tangent is always larger.

This is trivial to understand.
Get 2 such sections and stick them together back to back:

We see the sine is a straight line going from the top to the bottom.
This means it MUST be smaller than the arc length as it is the shortest path between the 2 points.
We see the tangent is longer path, going out to a point then turning and coming back in.
And we see the arc between these, where it doesn't go straight down, but it also doesn't go out as far as the tangent. Instead it cuts the corner.
As it cuts the corner, it must be shorter than the tangent.

We can see it even better if we show another shortcut path here:

We see the path in blue cuts out a large chunk of the tangent path opting for a straight path between 2 points on the tangent.
This makes it shorter than the tangent. We also see it better approximates the curve, yet the curve still cuts that, making the arc shorter than that path which is shorter than the tangent.

So if you do it properly you will always see that the arc is between the sine and the tangent.
There is no way out of that.

In real technic companies, pi is not applied. They pick, among others, 3.15.

No.  Pi rounded to 2 decimal places is 3.14.  However, super precision machine tools would probably take pi to at least 6 decimal places, if not more.

Tire circumference length, sphere area are for Phew.

For circumference, once again: use TAPE, not rediculous thread.

Pi Tape is a proof that you must manipulate the calculation method to get pi, which is not long enough for a perfect circumference.

Tire circumference length, sphere area are for Phew.

For circumference, once again: use TAPE, not rediculous thread.

Pi Tape is a proof that you must manipulate the calculation method to get pi, which is not long enough for a perfect circumference.

Nope. Pi still works fine for all of it.

for 1 D and 2 D it's Phew = 3.17157
for 3 D it's Pi = 3.14159

Deal?

 

Correction:

for circumference, the constant is Phew = 3.17157

for circle area, the constant is Pi = 3.14159

for sphere area & sphere volume, the constant is Phew = 3.17157

Only the best people accept Phew.
Jack, da ya wanna be part of da best people? Go phew. 

Quote from: Danang on September 12, 2024, 03:23:29 PM

for 1 D and 2 D it's Phew = 3.17157
for 3 D it's Pi = 3.14159

Deal?

 

Correction:

for circumference, the constant is Phew = 3.17157

for circle area, the constant is Pi = 3.14159

for sphere area & sphere volume, the constant is Phew = 3.17157

Actual correction:
For circumference, the constant is pi.
For circle area, the constant is pi.
For sphere surface area and sphere volume, the constant is pi.

It is pi for all, as they are all related.

Only the best people accept Phew.
Jack, da ya wanna be part of da best people? Go phew. 

The best people recognise phew is delusional BS, that needs to flee from so much which shows it is wrong.

It's pi all the way down.

Pi failed in experiment, maths, as well as technic companies.   

In tiny angles, tangent chord & sinus chord becomes relatively IDENTICAL. While there is always ROOM for the arc to stay between both chords.

So arc is SUPERIOR against both chords which lead to C/D = 3.14159.

Chord is not part of circle, it's part of polygon.

Pi failed in experiment, maths, as well as technic companies.   

Yet you can't provide a single example.

In tiny angles, tangent chord & sinus chord becomes relatively IDENTICAL.

And the arc is always between them, bounded in length by them. Meaning all three become basically the same.

So arc is SUPERIOR against both chords which lead to C/D = 3.14159.

That is just pure nonsense.

We know what the tangent "chord" is. We know the sine chord is a shortcut as a straight line directly between the points.
We know the arc is a short cut that rounds out the corner from the tangent "chord", so it must be shorter than the tangent, but longer than the sine.

Again, this is not hard to understand:


The tangent and sine bound the arc length, so to the extent they agree, the arc length must also be that.

There is no way around this.
If you wish to claim there is you need to tell us how a short cut is magically longer than the non-short cut path.

1. Make the radius huge, e.g. 1,000,000 km.
2. Make the angle tiny, e.g. 0.001.

You'll get
1,745,329.25 cm of sine chord (17s km)
1,745,329.25 cm of tangent chord (17s km)
15.23 cm of space for the arc.

The arc is SUPERIOR than the chord