This is the OP from rockseverywhere:
I aim to educate people but actively trying to destroy beliefs goes against my morals.
He used the candlejack account to show us what kind of morals he was talking about, and had created a second alt, jackblack, to actively destroy the beliefs that go against his morals.
Yes, everyone is responsbile for getting into a debate, that is not what we are talking about here. We, the FE, were never informed as to what was going on, that information about candlejack was kept deliberately and intentionally away from us. This is the crux of the matter. You think that any of us would have debated jackblack, even for a second, had we known that he was an alt of candlejack?
I am very good in discovering patterns, as you might well know by now, I see deeper and further in those messages of candlejack than you do, and I am telling you that the involvement of both jackblack and candlejack in the same threads (Coriolis and Sagnac among others), their accounts having been created just four days apart, and the language used by both in the responses lead me very quickly to see what is going on. We, the FE, never had the opportunity to make a judgement based on the entire set of facts. And you held that entire set of facts and never had divulged to us.
This is jackblack right here, in action:
https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=68423.msg1838045#msg1838045He used that account, candlejack, for his morals and did not push the gas pedal to the maximum; to destroy those who oppose his morals, he used the jackblack account exclusively.
Jackblack was banned for six months by John Davis on the trans issue. Then, you pleaded with John to remove that ban, and he did.