almost as if interpreting Bible literaly leads to intellectual suicide
Depends how you do it.
In order for Christianity to make any sense, at least some parts need to be literal.
Otherwise, it is just all fiction, including God and Jesus.
If you take everything which isn't presented as fiction as literal, and use it to accept the Bible is wrong, then there is no intellectual suicide there.
Taking the Bible as true, either as literal or just cherry picking which parts should be literal vs which parts shouldn't be, is intellectual suicide.
How do you explain what now?
The longest confirmed line of sight is 275 miles.
Considering you are using a shitty ancient book to pretend Earth must be flat, explain the BS line in that book which allows a much longer distance to be seen.
Or do you accept your shitty old book is pure BS?
If you want to ask me how I explain something, shouldn't you get something real?
So you accept your bible is fiction?
Well beyond where we are supposed to have curvature, yet all vision eventually ends.
Wrong again.
Well beyond where your STRAWMAN of curvature has vision magically end.
In reality, the distance you can see depends on the height of the observer and the object.
This was a picture of a very high object (the peak of a mountain) from a very high observer (on the peak of another mountain).
No issues with curvature here.
But of course, that wont stop liars like you from pretending.
Actually, your pictures are done by professional artists.
You claim this, because you are desperate to pretend they are.
But you can't show any fault with the images.
On the topic of Adobe Stock art.
You yet again spout pure nonsense.
Your "explanation" of why, doesn't even match. See how your lines showing where the light is go completely past the moon?
Why not try an honest one?
For a perfect flat surface, you get a reflection of the moon, just like a mirror.
For a round surface, you also get a reflection of the moon, but either shrunk or stretched depending on the direction of the curve.
But the curvature of Earth over that distance is so tiny, it would not produce a significant difference.
The distance to the horizon, for an observer height of 2 m, is 5 km. That gives a change in orientation of the surface of 0.045 degrees.
What causes this view is the ripples in the water, where the surface changes angles.
He means the edges. East, west, north, and south as far as you can go.
Then why did he say corners?
If he meant edges and not corners, then how do you know he didn't mean sphere not circle?
But strictly speaking, that's not right.
i.e. you accept the Bible is wrong?
So then, you admit that Earth can't rotate 1000+ mph and orbit 60,000+ mph?
No, as that is not being tossed.
In reality, it isn't the toss that kills you, it is the sudden stop when you hit the ground.
You can even model this with an egg.
Toss it really fast, and see that it is fine, until it hits something.
This is where it is required to transfer a force through it which exceeds its yield strength, so it fails.
This does not happen with the smooth motion Earth is undergoing.
I fled from nothing.
You have, yet again.
You fled from the refutation of your lies about the sidereal day.
You fled from the refutation of your lies regarding buoyancy.
Even in this post of yours now, you fled from a simple question showing your Bible is BS.
You continually flee, as you know you can't defend your pathetic BS.