What has happened??

  • 128 Replies
  • 7974 Views
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #30 on: February 19, 2024, 11:20:24 AM »
Haulstic healing
Meditation
Breathing
Exercise
Stretching
Good diet



But
Religion - communiyy, socializong/ism, morals.


However
Woflsbane
Vodoo
Silver
Whakcojacko




Theres a fine line between helping and providing nonsense and taking money from suckers.


« Last Edit: February 19, 2024, 11:22:23 AM by Themightykabool »

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #31 on: February 22, 2024, 07:33:59 PM »

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #32 on: February 23, 2024, 01:54:43 AM »
Wheres the hewia thread?

Did heie die?

He's just pining for the fjords. 
"I'm not entirely sure who this guy is, but JimmyTheLobster is clearly a genius.  Probably one of the smartest arthropods  of his generation." - JimmyTheCrab

Quote from: bulmabriefs144
The woke left have tried to erase photosynthesis

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18025
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #33 on: February 24, 2024, 07:58:07 AM »
Homeopathy is mainly considered "BS" because science doesn't have an explanation for why negligible doses of a substance can have great effect. It is a "counter-intuitive" theory on that basis.

However, this is mainly said in ignorance of other official theories. Science does have theories for why a small amount of substance can have a great effect. Consider traditional legacy vaccines. The theory was to give people small amounts or parts of a virus, or even a small amount of a toxin created by a germ, so that its effect was imperceptible but their immune system could recognize it and build immunity.

Look at Toxoid vaccines:

https://www.hhs.gov/immunization/basics/types/index.html

Quote
Toxoid vaccines

Toxoid vaccines use a toxin (harmful product) made by the germ that causes a disease. They create immunity to the parts of the germ that cause a disease instead of the germ itself. That means the immune response is targeted to the toxin instead of the whole germ.

Like some other types of vaccines, you may need booster shots to get ongoing protection against diseases.

This sounds oddly similar the the claims of Homeopathy. The substances in Homeopathy are also small amounts of toxins. I don't see why even a slight trace of it can't be enough for the immune system to recognize its injury at a micro or cellular level and try to build immunity.

One could even argue that a very small dose of the toxin would make it clearer to the cell of the immune system it is affecting on what needs to be done to contradict the toxin. Logically, a slightly injured or annoyed immune system cell can better understand and develop resources to guard against it than a severely injured or dead immune system cell can.

Logically, too, it can be reasoned that without the sensitivity of the gut immunity system, developing the immunity analysis elsewhere in the body where disease exists might be more difficult. The cells in the gut are said to be the basis of the immune system.

See this description on homeopahy from its inventor - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1676328/

Quote
Hahnemann believed that if a patient had an illness, it could be cured by giving a medicine which, if given to a healthy person, would produce similar symptoms of that same illness but to a slighter degree. Thus, if a patient was suffering from severe nausea, he was given a medicine which in a healthy person would provoke mild nausea. By a process he called ‘proving’, Hahnemann claimed to be able to compile a selection of appropriate remedies. This led to his famous aphorism, ‘like cures like’, which is often called the ‘principle of similars’; and he cited Jenner's use of cowpox vaccination to prevent smallpox as an example.

From WebMD - https://www.webmd.com/balance/what-is-homeopathy

Quote
How Does It Work?
A basic belief behind homeopathy is “like cures like.” In other words, something that brings on symptoms in a healthy person can -- in a very small dose -- treat an illness with similar symptoms. This is meant to trigger the body’s natural defenses.

Homeopathy claims that it triggers the body's natural defenses. A number of similar checkboxes seem to be marked, and its creator even compared it to the vaccines at the time.

Indeed, homeopathy groups claim that clinical trials have shown that homeopathy has clinical effect:

https://homeopathy-uk.org/treatment/evidence-for-homeopathy/

Quote
“To conclude that homeopathy lacks clinical effect, more than 90% of the available clinical trials had to be disregarded” -- Prof Robert Hahn, Homeopathy: Meta-Analyses of Pooled Clinical Data, 2013

As you look into it, it seems more and more possible, and is not clearly "BS". There is a body of what looks like evidence there. This is why the public is not debating Homeopathy, and by extension, has noticeably lessened its debate against Flat Earth Theory.
« Last Edit: February 25, 2024, 06:16:47 PM by Tom Bishop »

*

Username

  • Administrator
  • 17990
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #34 on: February 24, 2024, 06:25:03 PM »
I think the roundies would find that time and time again what you are told is scientific fact is far more often scientific fashion.
So long and thanks for all the fish

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #35 on: February 26, 2024, 08:42:08 AM »
Homeopathy is mainly considered "BS" because science doesn't have an explanation for why negligible doses of a substance can have great effect.
They don't need an explanation, as homeopathy doesn't work.
"I'm not entirely sure who this guy is, but JimmyTheLobster is clearly a genius.  Probably one of the smartest arthropods  of his generation." - JimmyTheCrab

Quote from: bulmabriefs144
The woke left have tried to erase photosynthesis

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #36 on: February 26, 2024, 08:59:41 AM »
homeopathy may work
but so far any test set up doesn't pass the placebo test

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • The Elder Ones
  • 50933
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #37 on: February 26, 2024, 12:26:29 PM »
It's a great way to spend a bunch of money on sugar pills.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

*

Jura-Glenlivet II

  • Flat Earth Inquisitor
  • 6541
  • Will I still be perfect tomorrow?
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #38 on: February 27, 2024, 12:49:13 AM »

Homeopathic A&E.

Life is meaningless and everything dies.

Every man makes a god of his own desire

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #39 on: February 27, 2024, 03:42:35 AM »

Homeopathic A&E.

That sketch just nails it.
"I'm not entirely sure who this guy is, but JimmyTheLobster is clearly a genius.  Probably one of the smartest arthropods  of his generation." - JimmyTheCrab

Quote from: bulmabriefs144
The woke left have tried to erase photosynthesis

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #40 on: February 27, 2024, 05:16:13 AM »
Hahahah

*

Jura-Glenlivet II

  • Flat Earth Inquisitor
  • 6541
  • Will I still be perfect tomorrow?
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #41 on: February 27, 2024, 08:29:39 AM »

It's funnier if you just watch one frame.
Life is meaningless and everything dies.

Every man makes a god of his own desire

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #42 on: February 27, 2024, 09:20:31 AM »

It's funnier if you just watch one frame.
Just a fraction of a frame and you might actually die laughing.    Please don't try this.

Or for maximum, probably world ending, hilarity don't even look at a single frame.  The most powerful homeopathic medicines are so called 30X ones - they are diluted so much as to not contain a single molecule of the original substance.


Quote
Many homeopathic remedies come in 30X or 200C dilutions. A substance diluted to 30X contains 1 part of the substance in 1029 parts water. A very important concept in chemistry is the Avogadro number, which is determined by X-ray diffraction of crystals. It has a value of 6.0221367 × 1023 as calculated by the International Council of Scientific Unions. Taking this constant into account, the limit imposed upon dilution—that is, the dilution that can be made without losing the original substance altogether—is 12C or 24X. A dilution of 30X is far outside this limit; to obtain even a single molecule of a substance in a solution diluted 1030 times, it would be necessary to drink almost 30,000 L of the solution!

 
"I'm not entirely sure who this guy is, but JimmyTheLobster is clearly a genius.  Probably one of the smartest arthropods  of his generation." - JimmyTheCrab

Quote from: bulmabriefs144
The woke left have tried to erase photosynthesis

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18025
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #43 on: February 29, 2024, 09:42:24 AM »
There is another interesting theory in Homeopathy to explain why some of those extreme dilutions work, called Water Memory. As the mixture is diluted at each step, it is vigorously shaken, imbuing the water along the way with properties of the original substance.

Science rejects the idea that water can have a "memory" based on the particle theory of matter in which water atoms and the atoms of the toxin are distinct mechanisms and distinct molecules. However, this is another mistake of what science says. Many leading Quantum Mechanics researchers actually say that the particle theory of matter is wrong, and that classical atoms do not exist. Matter is made of vibrating waves in an aether-like fabric. As such, it is easier to see how there can be cross-contamination of vibrations.

Homeopathic organizations claim that experiments with spectroscopy have shown that a signature is maintained at different dilutions:

https://theaahp.org/articles/homeopathy-and-the-memory-of-water/

Quote
The UV-Vis spectras of Natrum Muriaticum and Nux vomica showed that 10 preparations, of each remedy and potency, provides a range of spectral variability but maintains the unique characteristics of the starting material spectra. The UV-Vis spectra for potencies of both remedies are distinct from that of succussed ethanol showing that the spectral information is unique to each remedy and each potency.
« Last Edit: February 29, 2024, 09:59:37 AM by Tom Bishop »

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #44 on: February 29, 2024, 09:52:27 AM »
you have to shake it so that the solution mixes.
insoluable solutions tend to separate.
like salad dressing.

if you're not mixing it, you could be drinking straight water for the first 99.99%of the sips.
and that last 0.001%sip is so concentrated of chemical it kills you.





possibly, possibly! they have extreme dillutions so they don't kill anyone and basically selling you sugar water at an overly inlfated price?
maybe?
MAAAAYBE?

study provided for by the homeopathic organization who has a vested interest in continued sale of their homepathic products?
i have a climate-change-doesn't-exist brought to you by big oil, a saturated-fat study brought to you by big sugar, and a smoking-doesn't-cause-cancer by big tobacco.


i assume YOUR type, if given a report by big pharma or nasa - would you believe it?

« Last Edit: February 29, 2024, 09:55:22 AM by Themightykabool »

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #45 on: March 01, 2024, 06:31:24 AM »
There is another interesting theory in Homeopathy to explain why some of those extreme dilutions work,
They don't work and it's not a theory, it's just hand waving bullshit.
"I'm not entirely sure who this guy is, but JimmyTheLobster is clearly a genius.  Probably one of the smartest arthropods  of his generation." - JimmyTheCrab

Quote from: bulmabriefs144
The woke left have tried to erase photosynthesis

*

Jura-Glenlivet II

  • Flat Earth Inquisitor
  • 6541
  • Will I still be perfect tomorrow?
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #46 on: March 01, 2024, 06:44:28 AM »

And if it retains the “memory” of things that have been in it how come we aren’t dying of the memory of the pollutants and sewage?
Life is meaningless and everything dies.

Every man makes a god of his own desire

*

Space Cowgirl

  • MOM
  • The Elder Ones
  • 50933
  • Official FE Recruiter
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #47 on: March 01, 2024, 06:50:49 AM »
Water remembers the poo.
I'm sorry. Am I to understand that when you have a boner you like to imagine punching the shit out of Tom Bishop? That's disgusting.

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #48 on: March 01, 2024, 07:01:36 AM »
Water remembers the poo.
Indeed.  It's all about the "cross-contamination of vibrations".
"I'm not entirely sure who this guy is, but JimmyTheLobster is clearly a genius.  Probably one of the smartest arthropods  of his generation." - JimmyTheCrab

Quote from: bulmabriefs144
The woke left have tried to erase photosynthesis

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #49 on: March 01, 2024, 07:48:31 AM »
Forever uncleaan!



Re: What has happened??
« Reply #50 on: March 01, 2024, 07:53:23 AM »
also
Im pretty sure if they can melt stolen gold and make it untraceable and distilled water literally to remove imperuitied, that water doesnt hold memory.



You also an air breatharian believer?
One of those people who beleives they can recombine air into all the nutrients of life?



One of the famous tv flatties drinks hisbown piss.


https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fmetro.co.uk%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F05%2Fpri_39197024.jpg%3Fquality%3D80%26strip%3Dall&tbnid=s_4b2WTRxX8IiM&vet=1&imgrefurl=https%3A%2F%2Fmetro.co.uk%2F2017%2F05%2F10%2Fessex-dad-drinks-a-glass-of-his-urine-every-morning-then-splashes-it-on-his-face-6627222%2F&docid=TjJ2astBawmZEM&w=2500&h=1540&source=sh%2Fx%2Fim%2Fm4%2F2&kgs=e168365320b4173c&shem=trie



« Last Edit: March 01, 2024, 07:56:52 AM by Themightykabool »

*

Tom Bishop

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 18025
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #51 on: March 04, 2024, 07:44:42 PM »
Homeopathy is on a whole different level than most pseudosciences. The Homeopathy debate is comprised of scientists debating scientists.

There is certainly a lot of denial and incredulity, and many scientists who don't believe it based on not understanding how it can work, or who say there is no evidence. But there have been hundreds of homeopathy experiments and hundreds of homeopathy research papers. There is a vast amount of content on this.

Here are a couple of pro-homeopathy papers. These scientists say they looked into it and there is something to it -

https://article.imrpress.com/bri/Elite/articles/pdf/Elite489.pdf

Quote
Frontiers in Bioscience E4, 1669-1682, January 1, 2012

What is Homeopathy? An Introduction
Peter Fisher1

Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine, 60 Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3HR, UK

...

6. CONCLUSIONS

Homeopathy is a system of medicine based on the idea of ‘let like be cured by like’. Its main principle is that of similitude, but the controversial aspect of homeopathy is its use of high ‘ultramolecular’ dilutions. Other important concepts include holism and idiosyncrasy. The founder of homeopathy, Samuel Hahnemann was insistent that the similarity should be established on the basis of pharmacology or toxicology or human volunteer experiments known as provings or homeopathic pathogenetic trials.

Homeopathy spread widely in the 19th century as a result of its success in epidemic diseases and the endorsements of prominent individuals, in many parts of the world, and particularly the United States it experienced a sharp decline for most of the 20th century but its use has
increased worldwide sine the late 20th century. It is regulated and recognised in a number of countries worldwide.

Homeopathy is highly controversial because of its use of ‘ultramolecular’ medicines, diluted beyond Avogadro’s number and for this reasons has been criticised and sometimes been the object of polemics. Yet there is a body of clinical evidence which although not conclusive suggests that homeopathy does indeed have ‘real’ (ie not placebo) clinical effects. There is a large ‘credibility gap’ surrounding homeopathy due to its use of very dilute medicines. However a number of animal and in-vitro studies now seem to support the concept that such dilutions might have physiological effects. There is some modern empirical and theoreticalphysical and physico-chemical work which suggests a basis for such actions.

Despite the long history of scientific controversy surrounding homeopathy and despite periods of apparently terminal decline, homeopathy has proved resilient and is now geographically widespread. There is a significant and growing body of scientific endeavour around homeopathy

https://www.elsevier.es/en-revista-clinics-22-articulo-scientific-evidence-for-homeopathy-S1807593223000911

Quote
Clinics Vol. 78. (January - December 2023)

Scientific Evidence for Homeopathy

Marcus Zulian Teixeira


Upon discussing homeopathy in various settings, the authors often find that people react with mistrust, and raise doubts about its scientific grounds and therapeutic validity. Widely disseminated in the mass media, in indistinct and reiterated manner, the fallacy – or post-truth – asserting “there isn't scientific evidence for homeopathy” is incorporated into the collective subconscious, thus serving as a strategy to increase prejudice and radicalize postures against this bicentennial medical approach.

A fruit of disinformation or of negation of the studies that ground the homeopathic paradigm on many scientific fields, prejudice is once and again fed by unfavorable pieces published in the mass media and social networks, which, in turn, very seldom divulge studies with results favorable to homeopathy.

Homeopathy has been a medical practice recognized worldwide for over two hundred years, developing care, teaching, and research activities in various health institutions and medical schools. It employs a clinical approach based on heterodox and complementary scientific assumptions (principle of cure by similarity, homeopathic pathogenetic trials, use of dynamized doses and individualized medicines), with the aim of triggering a curative response from the organism against its own disorders or illnesses.1

In view of being based on principles different from those employed by conventional medical practice, homeopathy is often the target of unfounded and widespread criticism by individuals who, systematically, deny homeopathic assumptions and any scientific evidence that proves them, as they are involved in dogmatic posture that prevents a correct and free analysis of prejudices. In reality, they are pseudo sceptics masquerading as pseudoscientists.

To elucidate physicians, researchers, health professionals, and the general public, demystifying culturally ingrained dogmatic postures and the pseudosceptical fallacy that “there isn't scientific evidence for homeopathy”, in 2017, the Technical Chamber for Homeopathy of the Regional Medical Council of the State of São Paulo (CREMESP, Brazil) prepared the Special Dossier “Scientific Evidence for Homeopathy”.2,3


This project had the support of the Brazilian Homeopathic Medical Association (AMHB) and the São Paulo Homeopathic Medical Association (APH) via divulgation in its scientific journal, Revista de Homeopatia (São Paulo), in three independent editions: online in Portuguese,4 online in English5 and printed in Portuguese.6 Expanding its dissemination to the Spanish-speaking public, this dossier has just been published in the scientific journal La Homeopatía de México in a special edition of the journal's 90th anniversary.7

In addition to describing the global situation of homeopathy as a medical specialty and its inclusion in the curricula of medical schools, the dossier further includes reviews on research lines that provide grounds to the homeopathic assumptions, to wit: therapeutic similitude principle, homeopathic pathogenetic trials, dynamized doses (High Dilutions – HDs), and medicine individualization based on the set of characteristic symptoms exhibited by patient/disease. Similarly, the efficacy and safety of homeopathic treatment are demonstrated in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses.

The dossier begins with a review entitled “Homeopathy: a brief description of this medical specialty”,8–10 which discusses historical, social, and political aspects of the institutionalization of homeopathy in Brazil and its inclusion in health care systems. It further describes the reasons for patients to seek this therapeutic approach.

The review on “Medical education in non-conventional therapeutics in the world (homeopathy and acupuncture)”11–13 highlights the relevance of the inclusion of homeopathy and acupuncture in the curriculum of medical schools in many countries around the world. Such inclusion – actualized in various modalities specifically targeting undergraduate and graduate students, medical residents, and practicing doctors ‒ is a result of the increasing interest of patients, leading to a similar interest among doctors to learn about such medical approaches.

Looking to provide scientific grounds for the therapeutic similitude principle through a systematic study of the rebound effect of modern drugs, the review entitled “Scientific basis of the homeopathic healing principle in modern pharmacology”14–16 discusses hundreds of studies published in high-impact scientific journals, which demonstrate a conceptual and phenomenological similarity between rebound effect and the vital reaction (or secondary action) homeopathic treatment elicits. Aiming at broadening the implications of such similarity, the author describes the use of modern drugs according to the therapeutic similitude principle, which leads to the application of the rebound effect (paradoxical reaction of the organism) with curative intention.

To account for the plausibility of the homeopathic use of HDs, the present dossier includes three reviews that describe the advances made in fundamental research over the past decades: “The soundness of homeopathic fundamental research”,17–19 “Effects of homeopathic high dilutions on in vitro models: a literature review”,20–22 and “Effects of homeopathic high dilutions on plants: a literature review”.23–25 These reviews discuss hundreds of experiments and dozens of lines of research that together demonstrate the effects of HDs in physical-chemical and biological models (in vitro, plants and animals).

Demonstrating that the positive effects of homeopathic treatment "are not a mere placebo effect", as it is widely advertised, the review “Clinical research in homeopathy: systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials”26–28 describes the positive results found in dozens of homeopathic placebo-controlled clinical trials targeting variable clinical conditions, as well as systematic reviews and meta-analyses. These results are particularly illustrated by two clinical trials conducted at prestigious Brazilian research institutions: “Potentized estrogen in the homeopathic treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study”29–31 and “Randomized, double-blind trial on the efficacy of homeopathic treatment in children with recurrent tonsillitis”.32–34

As concerns the safety of homeopathic treatment, the review entitled “Do homeopathic medicines cause drug-dependent adverse effects or aggravations?”35–37 demonstrates, through an analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials, that although mild and transient, homeopathic medicines cause more adverse effects compared to placebo.

The final review, “Do homeopathic medicines induce symptoms in apparently healthy volunteers? The Brazilian contribution to the debate on homeopathic pathogenetic trials”38–40 discusses the historical development and the state of the art in homeopathic pathogenetic trials. These experiments are conducted to establish the curative properties of drugs (pathogenetic effects on healthy individuals) that ground the application of the therapeutic similitude principle.

Despite the ongoing difficulties and limitations opposing the development of research in homeopathy – partly due to methodological aspects, and partly to lack of institutional and financial support – the experimental and clinical studies described in this dossier, which ground the homeopathic assumptions and confirm the efficacy and safety of this approach to therapeutics – provide unquestionable proof for the “availability of scientific evidence for homeopathy”, against the prejudice falsely disseminated by pseudosceptics and pseudoscientists.41,42

With the divulgation of the present dossier at open access trilingual editions, the authors hope to dispel doubts and sensitize their colleagues as to the validity and relevance of homeopathy as an adjuvant treatment complementary to all other medical specialties according to ethical and safe principles. In conformity with this integrative approach, homeopathic practice allows to broaden the understanding of human disease, increase therapeutic resources, contribute to the definition and effectiveness of medicine in chronic diseases, minimize the adverse effects of modern drugs and strengthen the patient-doctor relationship, among other aspects.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2024, 08:50:24 PM by Tom Bishop »

*

Jura-Glenlivet II

  • Flat Earth Inquisitor
  • 6541
  • Will I still be perfect tomorrow?
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #52 on: March 05, 2024, 01:01:40 AM »

The Lancet.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(05)67177-2/abstract

Findings
110 homoeopathy trials and 110 matched conventional-medicine trials were analysed. The median study size was 65 participants (range ten to 1573). 21 homoeopathy trials (19%) and nine (8%) conventional-medicine trials were of higher quality. In both groups, smaller trials and those of lower quality showed more beneficial treatment effects than larger and higher-quality trials. When the analysis was restricted to large trials of higher quality, the odds ratio was 0·88 (95% CI 0·65–1·19) for homoeopathy (eight trials) and 0·58 (0·39–0·85) for conventional medicine (six trials).

Interpretation
Biases are present in placebo-controlled trials of both homoeopathy and conventional medicine. When account was taken for these biases in the analysis, there was weak evidence for a specific effect of homoeopathic remedies, but strong evidence for specific effects of conventional interventions. This finding is compatible with the notion that the clinical effects of homoeopathy are placebo effects.
Life is meaningless and everything dies.

Every man makes a god of his own desire

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #53 on: March 05, 2024, 02:06:46 AM »
110 is a ridiculously small sample



And @tomtom

I dint know what papers youre referring to but given that scie tista can write papers on sugar, cholesterol, tobacco and climate denial, i would be very surprised that the so "easily proven" homeopathic methods arent able to cure americans health woes.

Circles and triangles - homoepathy either works or it doesnt.
Youd think itd be proven by now.
The usa vitamin lobby is no small potatoes outfit so much so that the very ilelgal multilevel sales org are allowed to exist just to push these "drugs".

« Last Edit: March 05, 2024, 02:12:17 AM by Themightykabool »

*

Jura-Glenlivet II

  • Flat Earth Inquisitor
  • 6541
  • Will I still be perfect tomorrow?
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #54 on: March 05, 2024, 02:10:15 AM »

They should have probably used 1 sample and watered it down.
Life is meaningless and everything dies.

Every man makes a god of his own desire

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #55 on: March 05, 2024, 03:06:21 AM »
Homeopathy is on a whole different level than most pseudosciences.
Can't argue with that.    It really is one of the stupidest pseudosciences out there.
"I'm not entirely sure who this guy is, but JimmyTheLobster is clearly a genius.  Probably one of the smartest arthropods  of his generation." - JimmyTheCrab

Quote from: bulmabriefs144
The woke left have tried to erase photosynthesis

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #56 on: March 05, 2024, 03:08:27 AM »
110 is a ridiculously small sample

110 trials is a small sample?  How many would you suggest?
"I'm not entirely sure who this guy is, but JimmyTheLobster is clearly a genius.  Probably one of the smartest arthropods  of his generation." - JimmyTheCrab

Quote from: bulmabriefs144
The woke left have tried to erase photosynthesis

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #57 on: March 05, 2024, 04:49:17 AM »
I should clarify

SOUNDS like a ridiculously small sample size.

Shouldnt i be like 1000 or more?





Also
Pseudo
Its in the name.
And it kind of gives the game away.

*

Jura-Glenlivet II

  • Flat Earth Inquisitor
  • 6541
  • Will I still be perfect tomorrow?
Re: What has happened??
« Reply #58 on: March 05, 2024, 05:57:12 AM »

That's 110 separate studies involving over 7,000 people not just 110 people, and to be honest how many scientists are going to go out and do studies on something so ridiculous anyway? Hardly a place to make your name.
Life is meaningless and everything dies.

Every man makes a god of his own desire

Re: What has happened??
« Reply #59 on: March 05, 2024, 06:30:06 AM »
Ah ok
Sounds reasonable