Then we look at countless videos of Saturn
Be honest.
You look at countless shit videos from inferior instruments.
The sole example you have using a better instrument is so horrible compressed it isn't funny, and it has the rings in the way.
Again, that is just like closing the blinds on a window to call someone a liar because you can't see the car through the blinds.
You have NOTHING to justify your delusional BS.
Here’s the entire clip of Saturn at 8:30 to 9:31 within this video
https://www.google.ca/search?q=mt+wilson+telescope+planets&client=safari&sca_esv=2a58a15ae2bc46a7&hl=en-ca&biw=320&bih=451&tbm=vid&ei=p-sRZvSTEIjh0PEPrdqJmAM&udm=&oq=mt+wilson+telescope+planet&gs_lp=EhBtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXZpZGVvIhptdCB3aWxzb24gdGVsZXNjb3BlIHBsYW5ldCoCCAAyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUjkYlCiFljtWHAAeACQAQCYAcgBoAGRCqoBBjE1LjAuMbgBAcgBAPgBAYoCEG1vYmlsZS1nd3MtdmlkZW-YAhCgAoALwgIIEAAYgAQYogTCAggQABiJBRiiBMICBxAAGIAEGA3CAgsQABiABBiKBRiGA8ICBRAAGIAEwgIGEAAYFhgewgIFECEYnwWYAwCIBgGSBwYxNC4xLjGgB6Yt&sclient=mobile-gws-video#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:89649c6d,vid:0edD-121j4k,st:0Taken through an iPhone which was pointed on the telescope, why don’t they use the best instruments of today to film Saturn, but why question these great astronomers who never lie or hide their magnificent discoveries they have seen in endless ‘space’?
Why are you still asking me to prove your Demi-gods who told the world they have viewed Saturn in great detail never seen before then, filed their impressive looking documents on it, describing their magnificent findings, such as seeing 5 distinct ‘belts’ on Saturn, even seeing their outer edges, particularly one of them, where they saw its edges running along in parallel, on one side, not on the other side, where they also saw a very distinct feature over one edge of that belt….
You must realize that all of their claims were told to people who had no idea what Saturn was, or may have heard of it, the end.
This all comes down to your gods of seeing things that only those gods shall see, but at least they’ll tell us what they’ve seen!!
Your great astronomers made these claims, they died long ago, but every other astronomer has supported their claims as true, or would say they do if asked, and so does NASA, who specifically referred to their claims of its rotation time as being very accurate, considering how long ago it was done!
It would not mean anything at all to most people, it appears as a passing remark, nothing more.
If they’re referring to claims made over 400 years ago, about how accurate they were for its rotation time, compared to their own measurements taken from ‘space probes’, think about what they’re saying, or implying here.
These claims were made over 400 years ago, that they saw and identified many features of Saturn, to allow them to calculate its rotation, after many earlier attempts, over many years of studying it and viewing it.
They claimed to have seen those things on Saturn, using a long scrapped telescope, which means they had replaced it with better telescopes, and saw these same features they had seen, or if they didn’t try to see it as they did, then it’s already fishy.
Your Honorable Gods claimed all of this many centuries ago, and later they had them scrapped, so they’ve have to know and see the same things they saw, just as good or better than they did, right?
And after all that time, since their claims were made, because it was all a ruse, which needed a story that worked out.
If anyone had a very significant claim, such as theirs were, and it would be relevant and useful to others in future studies, it would have been studied and timed again and again, over the centuries since, but they’ve never once done it, apparently.
That’s how I started looking into their claims about Saturn, and looked for any evidence for it, other studies of it, but they haven’t touched it, over all that time, which is very fishy, it would clearly be studied and calculated in timing it’s rotation over and over again, see the same features they did, only see it much better, closer and clearer than they did, and would have a more accurate rotation time for it, as well.
But when they’ve all ignored their research and findings, for over 400 years, when suddenly we hear NASA referring to those very claims they made ages ago, saying their own measurements were close to theirs, which is very impressive, our ancient gods of astronomy, this proves them as gods of the past.
Why would NASA ever refer to those claims, is if it’s been ignored for over 400 years, or others would have done it, and how it looks against their earlier findings.
As nothing is ever accepted as absolute fact, or conclusive, until thoroughly repeated and confirmed to leave absolutely no doubt at all, it might be left as is.
If you notice that when NASA was the first time they have ever referred to their claims, something they’d have studied and seen and calculated it’s rotation time, which would compare against their findings, to see if it matches up, or close to it, or not at all close to it.
It’s how everything else is done. Have we stopped studying Saturn? No, it’s been studied and still is, and will be in future.
Don’t you realize how this is so ridiculous?
After 400 years go by, they all ignore it, never happened at all, so it was obviously done intentionally, because…
They didn’t need to study it again, what they wanted to do, was to make Saturn a slowly rotating planet, like the Earth they told us was.
Their goal was to say that Saturn is another ball planet which slowly rotates like the ball Earth does.
Their claims of Saturn included their seeing fine details of Saturn, with one of those features being seen at a certain position on Saturn at a certain time.
This specific feature was very unique, of course, it could not be mistaken with any other feature on Saturn. This feature was a squiggle or distorted area that was on one edge of one of their 5 distinct belts.
After that, they just had to say this feature had moved to another position on Saturn, hours later, it seems.
It was eventually calculated in how long it took to rotate once precisely at the same spot.
These claims are complete lies, we can clearly see that Saturn does NOT have several distinct belts, it has only one very large ‘belt’ on the orb, and it is in a constant, endless, rapid rotation, as all of Saturn and its ring are. That’s why we cannot see it clearly, and why no feature can be seen at one position, at least not yet, for us anyway.
Look at how the one belt changes in its outline and position so rapidly, it is best seen in the clearest videos in sequential frames.
The ring changes its angle as well, seen best in sequential frames of a good video. The orb doesn’t stay in the exact center within the ring either, also seen best in separate frames of a video.
The angle of the rings cannot be due to camera movement or distortion either. The orb does not move when the ring changes its angle. This cannot be from distortion, it doesn’t make the ring change its angle like this.
And it’s your belief in their claims which has no evidence, and you are the one who supports their claims, you must show evidence for it, not say I have no evidence against their claims, because all the evidence shows that.
Look closely at that video you dismiss, and tell me if you really believe that this one large and indistinct belt will magically transform into several distinct belts on the original footage of it.
It’s filmed by an iPhone, or at least this one was.
That’s the funny part here. An iPhone took the video of Saturn, we can see them do it when they are at the telescope, pointing their iPhones on it!
What a joke!