While the polls showed Kılıçdaroğlu 5 points ahead, the mystery of Erdoğan's 5 points ahead has been solved. Using a feature of the program used in the election, 10% of Kılıçdaroğlu's votes were entered into the system as Erdoğan. So actually Kılıçdaroğlu won.
This time Erdogan stole the national will.
How could you determine this if only Erdogan has access to the voting software?
When the system first came to Türkiye, it was said that the software was available for this kind of cheating. Only tell it who you want to win, AI makes the rest. This is its property. And Erdogan's personality is more than enough to do that.
Why would you need AI tho?
Every voting system has that ability. All you need to do is simply enter in fake votes. Or just change the results manually in the database.
Hell, even simple paper ballots can be used for cheating. All you need to do is have fake paper ballots ready.
Why bother with that when you have AI? He or she applies the least reactive, hardest-to-understand tricks for you, so you cheat successfully with the least backlash. If AI works well, they may not even understand it.
Because AI is messy, unpredictable at times, and needs training.
Its also pointless if they were not able to fool you.
Also, why would they need to with minimal backlash? What are the people of your country going to do? Revolt? They'd all be killed.
You underestimate AI. AI can learn by itself. It does not need training by anybody else, does it by itself. People say the election was rigged and no one gets killed for this.
And how would it know what to train itself?
Where to get data?
I have seen AI.
It is a child, trying to mimmic others but is unable to be itself.
Which is why most chat bots are racist.
We know AI is often racist, Shifter, Stash and Jackblack are prime examples of this. But it doesn't all have to be like that, anybody, for example, you.
Useless discussion. You have to stop acting like an argument-making AI, who in order to underestimate the danger of AI.