It has.
No, it hasn't.
If it had, it would be trivial for you to provide the answer.
Instead you need to hide behind the lie that you already have.
If you think it has been, prove us all wrong by providing it here.
Again, how does the low pressure air above the object push the object down into the high pressure air?
Again, we know it has nothing to do with how it got there, so don't bother going down that path.
We also know it has nothing to do with it displacing air, because that just means the air is pushing on it, it doesn't magically displace only the air above to cause it to push back down.
Of course we can but it's understanding why and it isn't fictional gravity.
It is about understand why.
And it clearly isn't the air.
Instead, it appears to be a force entirely disconnected from air, which acts directly on mass.
That sure sounds like gravity.
And there is no reason to think gravity is fictional. Especially when it explains what is observed and has plenty of evidence supporting it.
Conversely, your idea that the air is doing it is clearly fictional.
Low pressure air can't push the object down into high pressure air.
And there is no reason for it to push high density objects one way and low density objects another.
You first have to understand how those heavy dense masses end up higher in order to fall and overcome below resistance.
No, we don't.
As it doesn't matter how it is moved.
If that was going to be the case, moving a heavy object to the right would result in the air pushing it back to the left; pushing a heavy object down would result in it pushing back up.
We can also easily see this with a tube sealed at one end, and then pushing a heavy object into it (creating a seal). Regardless of which way we push, the air pushes back opposite that. If we push it to the right, the air pushes back to the left. If we push it down, the air pushes up.
If we make the tube larger, so an air-tight seal isn't made, then the air flows around and doesn't push back.
For bonus points we can even use water.
We can have the water be nice and high density, sitting in a pot;
We heat the water up causing it to evaporate to low density steam.
This then rises upwards, to reach a cool surface above.
At this cool surface it condenses, and then falls.
In your fantasy, the air pushed the water up. There was no need for any external force to be provided to push it up. All that was required was converting it to steam. Then when it cooled, it falls back down.
So it clearly doesn't depend on how the heavy object got there.
And it clearly isn't the air causing it to fall.
Nothing is pushed up unless there's an added force to the atmospheric displacement of the object.
Such as the air pressure being greater below the object than above, being an "added" force.
Otherwise, what is there pushing a helium filled balloon up?
I have but it's perfectly clear you have no clue or intention of trying to understand it judging by your first quoted post in this reply.
No, you haven't.
Again, the fundamental issue you keep ignoring is that the air pressure is greater BELOW the object.
In order to push down, you need to have this low pressure air above the object overcome the higher pressure air below.
You have never explained how this happens.
The closest you have come to that is appealing to the dense mass of the object, as if it is trying to go down all by itself.
So again, what is perfectly clear is that you have no intention of trying to explain, as you clearly can't.
Negative scale reading.
No, negative pressure:
the scale will still have offered negative pressure upon it.
Do you know what a simpler name for negative pressure is? Vacuum.
anyone partaking should at least try and understand it.
And when they do, you just insult them because they don't just accept your fantasy works, because it doesn't.
Most just want to argue and try and ridicule then whine when they don't get the required bites.
No, most just explain why your model doesn't work and ask simple questions to demonstrate this, and YOU then try to to ridicule and wine because you can't answer.
Nobody's asking you to agree with it or accept it in any way shape or form but at the very least take some time to understand some of it to get to a better understanding of more.
Again, we are. We understand you claim that displacing the air causes things to be pushed down.
But we want to know why/how.
How does the air push objects down?
The atmosphere is crushing you back by your entire body's dense mass displacement of it.
Again, it is CRUSHING, not pushing down.
The full force of the atmosphere is pushing on the outside of your body, with a slightly higher force from below, meaning overall as well as crushing you, it pushes you up.
Feeling it pushing us in (or up) is not the same as feeling it pushing us down.
Have a good think about it, it may help you understand.
MAYBE.
Have you ever wondered how certain fish stand the pressures of deeper and deeper oceans?
By equalising with the outside pressure.
That way the force pushing out is the same as the force pushing in.
Once the pressure has roughly equalised, there is basically no crush.
Put your mind to work.
We have, which is why we know your model doesn't work.
I have but you somehow can't understand atmospheric displacement yet you can understand it when it comes to water.
You haven't.
We understand both, including why it happens.
And it can be explained in a few ways.
When you place something in air or water, this will raise the level of it (assuming it has an open top). This means it is higher, and wants to go back down.
This can be modelled with a see-saw.
Pushing something into water or air is pushing down its side of the see-saw and lifts up the other side.
This means the other side then tries to push back down, which in turn provides an upwards force on the side with the object.
i.e. the fluid pushes the object up.
The more fundamental way is to understand that each layer of fluid needs to support the weight of the fluid above. This creates a pressure gradient, with the pressure greater the further down you are. (As you don't believe in weight, but do accept the pressure gradient, you can start here)
This pressure gradient acts on any object inside the fluid, pushing it upwards. And doing the math we find out the upwards force is equal to the weight of the displaced fluid.
In both cases, the fluid pushes up.
So we do understand.
Putting an object in a fluid, causing it to displace that fluid, results in an upwards force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced.
It does not push the object down.
Why should putting it in a fluid cause the fluid to push it down?
That is what you refuse to explain.
Appealing to displacement does not help.