Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?

  • 2522 Replies
  • 262063 Views
*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1530 on: July 26, 2023, 03:28:56 AM »

More dense molecular makeup is all it is like anything.

No shit Sherlock.

Now address the issue. How are water molecules lighter to make floating water ice, and there are water molecules under the same conditions that are heavier that can form sinking water ice.
Understand denpressure and porosity and you'll have half a chance.
You appear not to be capable of trying.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1531 on: July 26, 2023, 03:34:13 AM »
Understand denpressure and porosity and you'll have half a chance.
You appear not to be capable of trying.


It makes sense in science where heavy water molecules have an extra neutron. 

It doesn’t make sense in den pressure delusion.





*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1532 on: July 26, 2023, 03:35:46 AM »
A again.  Things in motion can be in equilibrium.
No they can't. And just to be clear, everything is in motion.

Quote from: DataOverFlow2022

  The water leaving the discharge of a hose is in equilibrium with the water entering the hoses.
Absolutely not. It's under simple action and equal and opposite reaction to that action, meaning it's always trying to equalise but never can because to truly equalise would come under the same idea of being truly a vacuum and neither can be a thing because nothing could exist in equilibrium.

Quote from: DataOverFlow2022

A bridge is in equilibrium or balancing the loads it carriers.
Not at all. It's under stress at all times which is never exact.

Quote from: DataOverFlow2022

Quote
For a true equilibrium to be in force there must be an equal action to react instantly

Then a gun shot is in equilibrium?
Nope, It's action and equal and opposite reaction to that action. One immediately follows the other directly and indirectly to try and find equilibrium but never can.

Quote from: DataOverFlow2022

What was the equal and opposite reaction of the flow of the Mississippi River.  Then it must be in equilibrium?
The flow answers your question.
A flow has to have a gradient or a pressure variation.
Nothing is ever still.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1533 on: July 26, 2023, 03:37:48 AM »

This is why every action, which is a force greater than the opposing resistance until that resistance offers an equal and opposite reaction to that action.



Ok?  So again.

For this.



When it’s horizontal.  There is no change in gravitational potential energy.  I provide the energy to overcome all resistances to move the sledge and make it coast. The “atmosphere” only is resistance. The atmosphere is in no way providing an energy input that helps me move the sled.

When the sledge it placed in the vertical position



In den pressure delusion there is no new forces.  No new resistances

In reality moving the sled vertically adds a new “resistance” of fighting the force of gravity.  Trying to fight gravity to raise the sled’s gravitational potential.

The reason I can’t push up the sled but can move it horizontally is pushing up adds the “resistance” of changing potential gravitational energy by changing height above ground.
Understand the denpressure stacking and layered system and you may have a small chance of getting somewhere instead of throwing up stuff you have no clue about when pretending you are relating to answering against denpressure.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1534 on: July 26, 2023, 03:39:06 AM »

How does anything sit on anything for decades?

Hmmm 🤔

What’s the equal and opposite reaction of a rock sitting on a hill?
The resistance of the ground and the resistance of the atmosphere against the dense mass of the rock.
Pay attention.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1535 on: July 26, 2023, 03:49:28 AM »

Understand the denpressure stacking and layered system and you may have a small chance of getting somewhere instead of throwing up stuff you have no clue about when pretending you are relating to answering against denpressure.

That doesn’t answer what force is present to make the sled impossible to lift, and why it’s absent to make the sled possible to push horizontally.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1536 on: July 26, 2023, 03:54:14 AM »

How does anything sit on anything for decades?

Hmmm 🤔

What’s the equal and opposite reaction of a rock sitting on a hill?
The resistance of the ground and the resistance of the atmosphere against the dense mass of the rock.
Pay attention.


So that resistance is in equilibrium with the weight of the rock.  If the ground pushed up with more force than the weight of the rock, the rock would rise.  If the rock pushed down with more force than the resistance often by the ground, it would sink.


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1537 on: July 26, 2023, 03:59:07 AM »

No they can't. And just to be clear, everything is in motion.

Back to the hose.  If the hose is in steady state, the goes ins matches the goes outs.  If 1 gallon a minute is entering the hose, then the hose is discharging 1 gallon a minute.

The inlet and outlet flow is in equilibrium.  If it wasn’t, what would happen to the mass of the water by the difference in the inlet flow and the outlet flow?




« Last Edit: July 26, 2023, 04:08:50 AM by DataOverFlow2022 »

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1538 on: July 26, 2023, 04:02:46 AM »

For a true equilibrium to be in force there must be an equal action to react instantly

Then a gun shot is in equilibrium?



Nope, It's action and equal and opposite reaction to that action.

A shot bullet is an equal and opposite reaction no matter how you try to back track.  So by your logic a shot bullet is in equilibrium.


?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1539 on: July 26, 2023, 04:05:13 AM »
porosity

How is a water molecule of H20 more or less porous than a heavy water molecule of H20 under the same pressure and temperature? 

*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1540 on: July 26, 2023, 04:18:40 AM »
You need to stop projecting. You regularly do this and it offers you nothing.
Follow your own advice.
Look at how yet again, you just resort to insults rather than even attempting to address the multitude of flaws with your nonsense.

Still can't explain why there is a pressure gradient in the atmosphere.
Still can't explain why the atmosphere magically overcomes this pressure gradient to push objects down.
Still can't explain how solids hold their shape without an attractive force.

Instead, all you can do is throw out insults and deflect.

My homework and experiments are both hypothetical and also physically tested.
Yet you refuse to provide an experiment which can distinguish between denpressure and reality, pretending that everything that happens in reality must be 100% consistent with your nonsense even though you cannot explain it or justify it at all.

you are one person who does not do any physical experiments to prove a spinning globe. You are reliant solely on books, TV, and internet, and word of mouth by the masses to offer you what you believe are your facts.
Based upon what?
Your delusional fantasy that anyone who accepts reality is a delusional, brainwashed fool?

I have used vacuum chambers, and measured things like air and buoyancy. Plenty that shows your claims are garbage.

I said vacuum chambers do not exist. Evacuation chambers do
And with that you contradict yourself
Evacuation chambers are vacuum chambers.
You are just seriously desperate to pretend vacuums need to be perfect to be a vacuum to pretend space must be a perfect vacuum to pretend space can't exist.

But that is just your dishonesty.

You pretended you wanted to alternatively look against the global spinning effort and clearly, you're too scared to do that for fear of being ridiculed by the usual suspects. That much is clear.
You mean the time they were asking about buoyancy, where you were asked simple questions and fled from it?
It seems you are the one too scared to engage in rational thought.

The only way natural laws of physics can be defied is in fiction movies and a pretence of sending men/women into a space vacuum from a spinning globe. That kind of utter fictional nonsense.
There is nothing about going to space which defies the natural laws.
Conversely, your attempts to refute it have repeatedly done so, so much so that you flee from simple questions.

Nope, It's action and equal and opposite reaction to that action. One immediately follows the other
No, they don't.
They happen at the same time.

Understand the denpressure stacking and layered system
You mean your magical delusional BS which does whatever it needs to with no explanation at all?
How about you stop deflecting and start explaining?

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1541 on: July 26, 2023, 04:44:49 AM »
Does anybody else despise long posts as much as I do? This is one of those posts. Sceptimatic, I have done my own earth shape experiments.
I had a nice Earth and moon scale model I had made, using an Earth globe and a ping pong ball. It was set up across my verandah and was perfectly to scale, size and distance wise, as per globe earth scientific measurements.
As per globe Earth scientific measurements?
You mean as per indoctrinated schooling that you followed and believed and basically followed the patterns schooled into you to gain what you already believed.
That's simply regurgitation and re-enactment of models already implanted for you.
Physically you know nothing of Earth in terms of shape but hypothetically you believe you do.


Quote from: Smoke Machine
The beauty of it all being to scale, is I could bring my eye to close to the side of the Earth closest to the moon model and look at the moon, and confirm the moon looks the same size as it does when viewing the moon at night, in real life.
As above.



Quote from: Smoke Machine
I also had a smaller Earth and moon model setup, to scale, ofcourse, showing the elliptical orbit of the moon with perigee and apogee. It worked quite well. I was going to add in the sun, but it starts to get tricky.
As above, once again.

 
Quote from: Smoke Machine
As for other physical experiments do with Earth shape, I've done the usual. I've watched hundreds of ships and boats disappear over the horizon bottom first.
No, you haven't. You believe you have because that's what you were schooled into.
You put far too little emphasis on atmosphere creating a block out over distance due to light not being able to get back to your eyes, so losing light bottom first then top last as you would expect as the sea and sky hypothetically merge to create your hypothetical horizon line.


Quote from: Smoke Machine
I've layed flat on the sand facing East and watched the first glimmer of the sun's rays as they peaked over the horizon at sunrise, then jumped up, and ran up the steps of a steep cliffside, and watched the sunrise all over again from the very first glimmer of rays. You can't do that on a flat Earth, pal.
Yep you would expect this to happen because, as I said in the quote just above this, you lose light bottom first before the top of your eye. Consider the shape of your eye and you'll get why.
So seeing the light fade as the sun moves over and away from you and then getting up higher and looking pinpoint direct, you will bring back the light to the bottom of your eye much more depending on the height.


Quote from: Smoke Machine
I've tried to make a flat Earth model  but there's nowhere to start when it comes to scale. Just, nothing works. It can't be done. Even a sun and moon hovering over a white plate, doesn't work, because some days when you look up in the daytime sky, you can see where the sun is, and not far away, you can see where the moon is, with the sun lighting up one side of the moon, just like a sun lights up one side of a ball.
Nothing works because you've been handed one thing on a plate that's had so much shoehorning to make it appear to be what you're told you actually see.
You don't seem to pay any real attention to any possibility of alternates, you just pretend you have.


Quote from: Smoke Machine
I've also observed the setting sun, and the way the size of the sun does not change as it approaches the Western horizon, just as I'd expect if earth were a globe.
It does change size based on atmospheric conditions and the movement of the reflection to any person at specific spots.


Quote from: Smoke Machine
At those times, I've become aware the sun was not setting at all, but Earth's Western horizon was moving up as I was going backwards, as if standing on a giant beach ball rolling me backwards.
You became aware that your schooling kicked in and your belief of a globe and distant sun some 93 million miles away and a few million miles in circumference in a vacuum was being seen to appear or disappear from your view based on whether your belief was you standing on a spinning ball taking you backwards away from it or forward towards it to create what you're told are your sunsets and sunrises, respectively.

It's utter gunk to be fair, in my opinion, but you're more than welcome to follow the schooling.

Quote from: Smoke Machine
It's all relative, and to us here on Earth, the Sun is stationary, and it is Earth doing all the moving.
Or the sun is a moving reflection with its energy base in the centre of Earth. Obviously not to you and your schooling.

Quote from: Smoke Machine
Ofcourse, I made a scale model to demonstrate that, as well.

Of course. I mean anyone can make any model if they have all the instructions at hand. And you are in abundance of instructions.


Quote from: Smoke Machine
You can call my words gunk as much as you like, it doesn't change the fact you admit denpressure equals atmospheric pressure, and when you remove any atmospheric pressure around an object and test it, like in a vacuum chamber or extraction chamber, another force still brings that object towards the ground. Denpressure can't be the cause of it.

It doesn't change the fact that you have absolutely no clue about denpressure and are trying to offer up anything to make out you know something. It's as clear as anything you have no clue.


Quote from: Smoke Machine
I've done my own homework and tested things for myself. But, I can see the appeal flat earth may offer at face value, in the context of feeling secure.

I'd say the feeling secure comes from your side. Adherence to mass acceptance and opinion based on massive peer pressure and a comfort blanket of appealing to authority to appear to offer something backed entirely by that, against those who actually dare to think for themselves.

The comfort for you is knowing your homework is done for you and all you have to do is spew it out and not really have to think. This is why most of you never have a clue about other thoughts because you struggle to change your mindset to dare to brush the ready-prepared homework aside, knowing the marks you get for it offer you a leg up in your mind.



Quote from: Smoke Machine
I've been busier than a one legged man in an arse kicking competition, but when I'm less busy, I will flick the switch in my head and live my life for a week as a flat earther, as I said, and try hard to see why you love it so much.
You have no chance of flicking any switch in your head to look at anything alternate to your spinning globe and that is as clear as anything in this post of yours.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1542 on: July 26, 2023, 04:52:38 AM »

Does anybody else despise long posts as much as I do?

Yes, when is used like sceptimatic to distract, try to change the subject, make vague assumptions, uses false authority, and try to push all other people’s posts into the background or off page

What’s the topic of the thread sceptimatic is derailing? On yea “Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?”

So people like sceptimatic really think distraction, avoiding the actual topic, derailing, and goal post moving somehow makes FE true?

Do they think they really are fooling people? 

So sad to see this form of dishonest debate carried from other sites to here.
The only people being fooled are those like yourself who are fooled into thinking Earth is a spinning globe.
As for you saying I derail threads and moaning about it, start thinking about the change you and your crew made in this very thread not too long ago.
Hypocrite.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1543 on: July 26, 2023, 04:53:18 AM »
Understand denpressure and porosity and you'll have half a chance.
You appear not to be capable of trying.


It makes sense in science where heavy water molecules have an extra neutron. 

It doesn’t make sense in den pressure delusion.
Or an extra layer.
Put your thinking cap on.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1544 on: July 26, 2023, 04:58:25 AM »


That doesn’t answer what force is present to make the sled impossible to lift, and why it’s absent to make the sled possible to push horizontally.
The force is the sled itself displacing the atmosphere by its entire dense mass minus its natural volume of atmospheric layers.
I explained this before but as I knew, you took no notice because you do not have the ability to think.


*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1545 on: July 26, 2023, 04:59:54 AM »

So that resistance is in equilibrium with the weight of the rock.  If the ground pushed up with more force than the weight of the rock, the rock would rise.  If the rock pushed down with more force than the resistance often by the ground, it would sink.
As I said earlier. There can never be equilibrium. The issue for you is in thinking about what's said and that is troublesome for you.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1546 on: July 26, 2023, 05:00:59 AM »

No they can't. And just to be clear, everything is in motion.

Back to the hose.  If the hose is in steady state, the goes ins matches the goes outs.  If 1 gallon a minute is entering the hose, then the hose is discharging 1 gallon a minute.

The inlet and outlet flow is in equilibrium.  If it wasn’t, what would happen to the mass of the water by the difference in the inlet flow and the outlet flow?
Action and then equal and opposite reaction, directly and indirectly. Never any equilibrium and always motion.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1547 on: July 26, 2023, 05:03:27 AM »

No they can't. And just to be clear, everything is in motion.

Back to the hose.  If the hose is in steady state, the goes ins matches the goes outs.  If 1 gallon a minute is entering the hose, then the hose is discharging 1 gallon a minute.

The inlet and outlet flow is in equilibrium.  If it wasn’t, what would happen to the mass of the water by the difference in the inlet flow and the outlet flow?
Action and then equal and opposite reaction, directly and indirectly. Never any equilibrium and always motion.


Your own words.



For a true equilibrium to be in force there must be an equal action to react instantly


So by your definition everything is in equilibrium. 

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1548 on: July 26, 2023, 05:03:37 AM »

A shot bullet is an equal and opposite reaction no matter how you try to back track.  So by your logic a shot bullet is in equilibrium.
I already told you this. You have to be a robot or something.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1549 on: July 26, 2023, 05:05:15 AM »
porosity

How is a water molecule of H20 more or less porous than a heavy water molecule of H20 under the same pressure and temperature?
Because they are not the same as much as you'd like to think they are.
The structure is different.
Dense mass layering helps if you'd paid any attention earlier. It's like talking to a brick wall with you.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1550 on: July 26, 2023, 05:05:49 AM »

So that resistance is in equilibrium with the weight of the rock.  If the ground pushed up with more force than the weight of the rock, the rock would rise.  If the rock pushed down with more force than the resistance often by the ground, it would sink.
As I said earlier. There can never be equilibrium. The issue for you is in thinking about what's said and that is troublesome for you.

If the rock isn’t in equilibrium, why isn’t it being pushed up. Or sinking down.

The ground can only “push up” in response to the weight of the rock pushing down.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1551 on: July 26, 2023, 05:06:37 AM »

Follow your own advice.

I do and this is where I'm at with you two brothers. Neither of you is capable of understanding anything unless it's at your fingertips.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1552 on: July 26, 2023, 05:07:52 AM »

No they can't. And just to be clear, everything is in motion.

Back to the hose.  If the hose is in steady state, the goes ins matches the goes outs.  If 1 gallon a minute is entering the hose, then the hose is discharging 1 gallon a minute.

The inlet and outlet flow is in equilibrium.  If it wasn’t, what would happen to the mass of the water by the difference in the inlet flow and the outlet flow?
Action and then equal and opposite reaction, directly and indirectly. Never any equilibrium and always motion.


Your own words.



For a true equilibrium to be in force there must be an equal action to react instantly


So by your definition everything is in equilibrium.
Pay attention.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1553 on: July 26, 2023, 05:09:29 AM »


Because they are not the same as much as you'd like to think they are.

Cite where I said the were the “same” in the context the heavy water molecule of H20 has extra neurons for the hydrogens

In den pressure delusion why would one molecule of H20 be heavier than another molecule of H2O under the same pressure and temperature.  You know, the things that drive changes in your delusion. 




*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1554 on: July 26, 2023, 05:09:57 AM »

So that resistance is in equilibrium with the weight of the rock.  If the ground pushed up with more force than the weight of the rock, the rock would rise.  If the rock pushed down with more force than the resistance often by the ground, it would sink.
As I said earlier. There can never be equilibrium. The issue for you is in thinking about what's said and that is troublesome for you.

If the rock isn’t in equilibrium, why isn’t it being pushed up. Or sinking down.

The ground can only “push up” in response to the weight of the rock pushing down.
There is no weight of rock pushing down.
It's the dense mass of the rock displacing the atmosphere minus the volume within against the resistance of the ground beneath and the crush of the atmospheric layerings below the midpoint of it.

I know I know, this will just go right over your head.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1555 on: July 26, 2023, 05:11:15 AM »


Because they are not the same as much as you'd like to think they are.

Cite where I said the were the “same” in the context the heavy water molecule of H20 has extra neurons for the hydrogens

In den pressure delusion why would one molecule of H20 be heavier than another molecule of H2O under the same pressure and temperature.  You know, the things that drive changes in your delusion.
You accept one has more than another, right?

Now think about it.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1556 on: July 26, 2023, 05:11:55 AM »

No they can't. And just to be clear, everything is in motion.

Back to the hose.  If the hose is in steady state, the goes ins matches the goes outs.  If 1 gallon a minute is entering the hose, then the hose is discharging 1 gallon a minute.

The inlet and outlet flow is in equilibrium.  If it wasn’t, what would happen to the mass of the water by the difference in the inlet flow and the outlet flow?
Action and then equal and opposite reaction, directly and indirectly. Never any equilibrium and always motion.


Your own words.



For a true equilibrium to be in force there must be an equal action to react instantly


So by your definition everything is in equilibrium.
Pay attention.


That you contradict yourself?  And have nothing but word salad.

And you can only try to derail the thread.

How can you make an experiment using heavy water so one can experience the den pressure delusion. 
« Last Edit: July 26, 2023, 05:16:47 AM by DataOverFlow2022 »

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1557 on: July 26, 2023, 05:15:50 AM »


Because they are not the same as much as you'd like to think they are.

Cite where I said the were the “same” in the context the heavy water molecule of H20 has extra neurons for the hydrogens

In den pressure delusion why would one molecule of H20 be heavier than another molecule of H2O under the same pressure and temperature.  You know, the things that drive changes in your delusion.
You accept one has more than another, right?

Now think about it.


What?  Heavy water.  Because science clearly defines way there is heavy water, how to isolate it and concentrate it to purchase it, explains why it is heavier, and how it can be used in the real world.


While you offer vague assurances, can’t explain an experiment to personally witness den pressure delusion, you can’t explain how to produce heavy water with den pressure delusion, and only offer BS.

*

sceptimatic

  • Flat Earth Scientist
  • 30076
  • +3/-4
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1558 on: July 26, 2023, 05:17:00 AM »

No they can't. And just to be clear, everything is in motion.

Back to the hose.  If the hose is in steady state, the goes ins matches the goes outs.  If 1 gallon a minute is entering the hose, then the hose is discharging 1 gallon a minute.

The inlet and outlet flow is in equilibrium.  If it wasn’t, what would happen to the mass of the water by the difference in the inlet flow and the outlet flow?
Action and then equal and opposite reaction, directly and indirectly. Never any equilibrium and always motion.


Your own words.



For a true equilibrium to be in force there must be an equal action to react instantly


So by your definition everything is in equilibrium.
Pay attention.


That you contradict yourself?  And have nothing but word salad.

And you can only try to derail the threads.

How can you make an experiment using heavy water so one can experience the den pressure delusion.
You'll never experience anything because you have absolutely no clue about denpressure to even argue it or know anything.
Just stick to your schooled gunk, I've wasted enough time on you.

?

DataOverFlow2022

  • 8350
  • +48/-75
Re: Experiment ideas to prove Denpressure?
« Reply #1559 on: July 26, 2023, 05:20:29 AM »

There is no weight of rock pushing down.


Then why if you put a rock on a spring scale where the spring can be more dense than the rock, there is a force to compress the spring. 


Quote

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooke%27s_law


In physics, Hooke's law is an empirical law which states that the force (F) needed to extend or compress a spring by some distance (x) scales linearly with respect to that distance—that is, Fs = kx, where k is a constant factor characteristic of the spring (i.e., its stiffness), and x is small compared to the total possible deformation of the spring.

Where the rock weight can reach equilibrium with the elastic property of the spring.