However, if you actually observe what pulling forces are you will quickly notice that it takes a pushing force or a compressive force to move anything in any direction.
You have repeated this lie countless times.
You can be incredibly dishonest and look for any tiny pushing force, and then lie to everyone by claiming it means it is all push.
But that is just a pathetic lie.
You can believe anything you want to but I stick by what I'm saying.
If instead you look honestly, you need a pulling force.
There is no way out of it.
We have been over this repeatedly.
Remember the link in the chain?
How does the force get transmitted to the left?
By a PULLING force.
Again, here is what happens without it:
You offer a link that's being pushed and yet you split it.
What is it you're offering.
How about you offer a chain and try the same thing with your supposed (attrractive/pulling force?
And try and explain what a pulling force actually means.
Remember the gobstopper and peeling and layering and how the peeling works to change molecular behaviour?
Remember how you can't explain what keeps your layers of molecules attracted to each other to hold together in the gobstopper?
Pay attention.
If you can't grasp what was said then it's you that has the issue.
If you want to go on and on saying I haven't explained then you'll be always saying it and that's on you because I'm absolutely fine with what I have explained.
Every molecule is attached to a molecule
Attached, as in an attractive force, or merely touching?
There is a very big difference.
There's no difference other than the pressures of attachment. It's all compression and decompression but you can't compress unless you decompress.
Seems counterintuitive but only if you don't pay attention.
You can't offer attraction or pulling because you have no clue what mechanism can create it.
There's a reason for that.
I'll tell you what makes no sense and that is, free space.
How about instead of just repeating the same pathetic assertions, you try explaining it.
Why doesn't it makes sense?
It makes no sense because to have free space means you offer no path for anything, meaning life cannot work and nor can the cell of life nor the entirety of all the rest of it.
However, if you want to change your free space to saying you think an empty room with some space in it is free space of molecules you cannot see and can offer boxes to fill it then I'd happily understand why you're offering it.
But you aren't offering anything like this, are you?
You're offering your fictional vacuum of nothing. Zilch. Nada. Total non-existence of matter/molecules or your atoms or whatever you want.
And this is where your science becomes the fiction.
The gobstopper analogy and the peeling should offer you some crude insight
It offers none, because it explains nothing.
You have no reason for why some things are solid, some are liquid and some are gas.
There is no reason without attractive forces.
If you paid closer attention you would understand.
Maybe ponder over what I said above with the mindset of solids and how far each goes to be what they are deemed as.